Understanding the very nature of Project Management : a praxiological approach

Foreword: In this paper I call upon a praxiological approach. Praxeology (early alteration of praxiology) is the study of human action and conduct. The name praxeology/praxiologyakes is root in praxis, Medieval Latin, from Greek, doing, action, from prassein to do, practice (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). Having been involved in project management education, research and practice for the last twenty years, I have constantly tried to improve and to provide a better understanding/knowledge of the field and related practice, and as a consequence widen and deepen the competencies of the people I was working with (and my own competencies as well!), assuming that better project management lead to more efficient and effective use of resources, development of people and at the end to a better world. For some time I have perceived a need to clarify the foundations of the discipline of project management, or at least elucidate what these foundations could be. An immodest task, one might say! But not a neutral one! I am constantly surprised by the way the world (i.e., organizations, universities, students and professional bodies) sees project management: as a set of methods, techniques, tools, interacting with others fields – general management, engineering, construction, information systems, etc. – bringing some effective ways of dealing with various sets of problems – from launching a new satellite to product development through to organizational change.

[1]  Donald A. Schön Beyond the stable state , 1971 .

[2]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[3]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[4]  소진덕,et al.  From Strategic Planning to Strategic Management , 1977 .

[5]  Vladimir Voropajev,et al.  Change management—A key integrative function of PM in transition economies , 1998 .

[6]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[7]  R. Ackoff,et al.  Redesigning the Future, a Systems Approach to Societal Problems , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[9]  Jean-Claude Tarondeau,et al.  De la stratégie aux processus stratégiques , 2006 .

[10]  P. Dinsmore Winning in Business with Enterprise Project Management , 1999 .

[11]  M. Boisot Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy , 1998 .

[12]  Christophe Bredillet,et al.  Genesis and role of standards : theoretical foundations and socio-economical model for the construction and use of standards , 2003 .

[13]  Daniel H. Kim The Link between individual and organizational learning , 1997 .

[14]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[15]  H. Ansoff,et al.  Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals , 1975 .

[16]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[17]  Tony Grundy,et al.  Strategy implementation and project management , 1998 .

[18]  L. Mises,et al.  Epistemological Problems of Economics , 1961 .

[19]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The management of projects , 1994 .

[20]  J. Davidson Frame Project Management Competence: Building Key Skills for Individuals, Teams, and Organizations , 1999 .

[21]  R. Reich The Work of Nations , 2006 .

[22]  R. Gareis Management by projects: the management strategy of the ‘new’ project-oriented company☆ , 1991 .

[23]  Jacques Lesourne,et al.  Articuler prospective et stratégie : parcours du stratège dans la complexité , 1998 .

[24]  Adnane Belout,et al.  Effects of human resource management on project effectiveness and success: toward a new conceptual framework , 1998 .

[25]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .