Measuring patent's influence on technological evolution: A study of knowledge spanning and subsequent inventive activity

We introduce technological influence as a variable to measure an invention's direct and indirect impact on the evolution of technology. This provides a novel means to study the short and long run effect of invention antecedents on technological evolution, invention activity, and economic growth. A comparison between models of technological influence and direct technological impact is presented. Model estimations are based on data from semiconductor patents granted over a 5-year period. Results from quantile regression estimations show significant differences in the relationships between antecedents of technological influence and impact. For example, pioneering the spanning of knowledge boundaries has a positive relationship with the patent's influence, while no relationship is found with direct citations. These results have important implications for public policy and the management of technology. They suggest the need for deeper understanding of the micro-foundations of the technological evolution process and raise the question of whether inventors under current IP protection receive adequate economic incentives to promote actions driving economic growth.

[1]  K. Rost.  The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation , 2011 .

[2]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[3]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[4]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[5]  James E. Bessen,et al.  Estimates of Patent Rents from Firm Market Value , 2007 .

[6]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[7]  James Bessen.  The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics , 2006 .

[8]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[9]  L. Fleming.  Breakthroughs and the ¿Long Tail¿ of Innovation , 2007 .

[10]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[11]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[13]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Melissa A. Schilling.  A "Small-World" Network Model of Cognitive Insight , 2005 .

[16]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[17]  Marco Guerzoni,et al.  University Knowledge, Originality of Patents and the Creation of New Industries , 2012 .

[18]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Sharon Belenzon.  Cumulative Innovation and Market Value: Evidence from Patent Citations , 2012 .

[20]  K. Pavitt.  What makes basic research economically useful , 1991 .

[21]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[22]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation , 1997 .

[23]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  Science, the endless frontier : A report to the President , 2011 .

[24]  R. Levin.  Appropriability, R&D Spending, and Technological Performance , 1988 .

[25]  D. E. Stokes.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[26]  G. Binnig,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy , 1984 .

[27]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2001 .

[28]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[29]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[30]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: An Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[31]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[33]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Escaping real (non-benign) competency traps: linking the dynamics of organizational structure to the dynamics of search , 2005 .

[34]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[35]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[36]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The structure of invention , 2007 .

[37]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[38]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[39]  Elizabeth Wilson,et al.  NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS , 2008 .

[40]  Bhaven N. Sampat,et al.  Patent Citations and the Economic Value of Patents , 2004 .

[41]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[42]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[43]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[44]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Do Important Inventions Benefit from Knowledge Originating in Other Technological Domains? , 2011 .

[45]  Gautam Ahuja,et al.  Managerial Foresight and Attempted Rent Appropriation: Insider Trading on Knowledge of Imminent Breakthroughs , 2005 .

[46]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[47]  F. Scherer,et al.  Demand-Pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited , 1982 .

[48]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[49]  N. Rosenberg.  Science, Invention and Economic Growth , 1974 .

[50]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of Nasa and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation , 1997 .