Physical principles and technology of clinical PET imaging.

Molecular imaging with positron-emitting radionuclides is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and staging of malignant disease and in monitoring response to therapy. To meet this challenge, significant improvements in the performance of the imaging technology have been achieved in recent years. Such developments are subject to the constraints imposed by the physics of positron emission tomography (PET) and the main objectives in designing or improving PET scanners are to achieve high spatial resolution and sensitivity while maximising the true coincidence count rate relative to contributions from noise processes. Noise contributions in PET include not only statistical effects associated with photon counting but also background processes such as scatter and random coincidences. The recent developments of new, faster scintillators and electronics for PET detectors, as well as statistically-based algorithms that reconstruct fully three-dimensional (3D) PET images in minutes, have dramatically reduced clinical imaging times while improving image quality. A recent advance, the combination of functional imaging and computed tomography (CT) in the PET/CT scanner has further reduced the study duration by eliminating the lengthy PET transmission scan and providing accurate anatomical localisation of functional abnormalities. PET imaging technology has now improved to where a combined anatomical and functional clinical study can be completed in less than 10 minutes--although taking advantage of such high throughput potential will challenge patient management in diagnostic imaging departments. This paper reviews the physical principles underlying PET and summarises the recent developments in PET scanner technology, from the introduction of new PET detectors to the development of the combined PET/CT scanner.

[1]  Peter D. Esser Emission Computed Tomography: Current Trends , 1983 .

[2]  B F Hutton,et al.  Simultaneous emission and transmission measurements for attenuation correction in whole-body PET. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  R. Nutt,et al.  A Multicrystal Two Dimensional BGO Detector System for Positron Emission Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[7]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[8]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  J. Ollinger Model-based scatter correction for fully 3D PET. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  C. C. Watson,et al.  New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[11]  C. Comtat,et al.  Fast reconstruction of 3-D PET data with accurate statistical modeling , 1997 .

[12]  S. Cherry,et al.  Combining anatomy and function: the path to true image fusion , 2001, European Radiology.

[13]  D. Newport,et al.  A Single Scatter Simulation Technique for Scatter Correction in 3D PET , 1996 .

[14]  C. Melcher,et al.  Cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate: a fast, efficient new scintillator , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[15]  K. Takagi,et al.  Cerium‐activated Gd2SiO5 single crystal scintillator , 1983 .

[16]  S Grootoonk,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Positron Scanner ECAT EXACT , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  T J Spinks,et al.  Physical performance of a positron tomograph for brain imaging with retractable septa. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  K Herholz,et al.  Three-dimensional alignment of functional and morphological tomograms. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[21]  S R Meikle,et al.  A convolution-subtraction scatter correction method for 3D PET. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  D. Townsend,et al.  The Theory and Practice of 3D PET , 1998, Developments in Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Roberto A. Isoardi,et al.  Volume Imaging Tomographs , 1998 .

[25]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[26]  O. Warburg [Origin of cancer cells]. , 1956, Oncologia.

[27]  Norbert Avril,et al.  Relevance of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology , 1999, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[28]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Application of the row action maximum likelihood algorithm with spherical basis functions to clinical PET imaging , 2001 .

[29]  Z. Cho,et al.  Bismuth germanate as a potential scintillation detector in positron cameras. , 1977, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  D W. Townsend,et al.  Combined PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Impact on Patient Management. , 2000, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[31]  C Nahmias,et al.  Attenuation correction in PET using single photon transmission measurement. , 1994, Medical physics.

[32]  D W Townsend,et al.  A combined PET/CT scanner: the choices. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  C. Meltzer,et al.  Image Analysis in Patients with Cancer Studied with a Combined PET and CT Scanner , 2000, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[34]  P. Grangeat,et al.  Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine , 1996, Computational Imaging and Vision.