Electricity can be produced directly with reverse electrodialysis (RED) from the reversible mixing of two solutions of different salinity, for example, sea and river water. The literature published so far on RED was based on experiments with relatively small stacks with cell dimensions less than 10 × 10 cm(2). For the implementation of the RED technique, it is necessary to know the challenges associated with a larger system. In the present study we show the performance of a scaled-up RED stack, equipped with 50 cells, each measuring 25 × 75 cm(2). A single cell consists of an AEM (anion exchange membrane) and a CEM (cation exchange membrane) and therefore, the total active membrane area in the stack is 18.75 m(2). This is the largest dimension of a reverse electrodialysis stack published so far. By comparing the performance of this stack with a small stack (10 × 10 cm(2), 50 cells) it was found that the key performance parameter to maximal power density is the hydrodynamic design of the stack. The power densities of the different stacks depend on the residence time of the fluids in the stack. For the large stack this was negatively affected by the increased hydrodynamic losses due to the longer flow path. It was also found that the large stack generated more power when the sea and river water were flowing in co-current operation. Co-current flow has other advantages, the local pressure differences between sea and river water compartments are low, hence preventing leakage around the internal manifolds and through pinholes in the membranes. Low pressure differences also enable the use of very thin membranes (with low electrical resistance) as well as very open spacers (with low hydrodynamic losses) in the future. Moreover, we showed that the use of segmented electrodes increase the power output by 11%.
[1]
J. Veerman,et al.
Reducing power losses caused by ionic shortcut currents in reverse electrodialysis stacks by a validated model
,
2008
.
[2]
Hubertus V. M. Hamelers,et al.
Influence of multivalent ions on power production from mixing salt and fresh water with a reverse electrodialysis system
,
2009
.
[3]
G. J. Harmsen,et al.
Reverse electrodialysis: Comparison of six commercial membrane pairs on the thermodynamic efficiency and power density
,
2009
.
[4]
J. D. Stigter,et al.
Extending potential flow modelling of flat-sheet geometries as applied in membrane-based systems
,
2008
.
[5]
J. Post,et al.
Salinity-gradient power : Evaluation of pressure-retarded osmosis and reverse electrodialysis
,
2007
.
[6]
G. J. Harmsen,et al.
Reverse electrodialysis: evaluation of suitable electrode systems
,
2010
.
[7]
R. E. Pattle.
Production of Electric Power by mixing Fresh and Salt Water in the Hydroelectric Pile
,
1954,
Nature.
[8]
J. Post,et al.
Energy recovery from controlled mixing salt and fresh water with a reverse electrodialysis system.
,
2008,
Environmental science & technology.
[9]
G. J. Harmsen,et al.
Reverse electrodialysis : Performance of a stack with 50 cells on the mixing of sea and river water
,
2009
.