Effects of Changes in Experimental Design on PET Studies of Isometric Force

Based on single-cell recordings in primates, the relationship between neuronal activity and force magnitude is thought to be monotonic, at least for a subset of pyramidal cells in the motor cortex. Functional neuroimaging studies have also suggested a monotonic relationship between cerebral activation and force magnitude. In order to more precisely define this relationship and to characterize the activation pattern(s) associated with the modulation of static force, we studied 40 normal subjects using [(15)O]water PET and a simple visuomotor task-application of static force on a micro force sensor with the thumb and index finger of the right hand. When our experimental design did not produce the expected result (evidence of a relationship between cerebral activation and force magnitude in ten subjects), we made serial changes in the experimental protocol, including the addition of control (baseline) trials, and increased the number of subjects in an effort to increase our sensitivity to variations in force magnitude. We compared univariate and multivariate data-analytic strategies, but we relied on our multivariate results to elucidate the interaction of attentional and motor networks. We found that increasing the number of subjects from 10 to 20 resulted in an increase in statistical power and a more stable (i.e., more replicable) but qualitatively similar result, and that the inclusion of control trials in a 10-subject group did not enhance our ability to discern significant brain-behavior relationships. Our results suggest that sample sizes greater than 20 may be required to detect parametric variation in some instances and that failure to detect such variation may result from unanticipated neurobehavioral effects.

[1]  Daniel S. O'Leary,et al.  Factors That Influence Effect Size in15O PET Studies: A Meta-analytic Review , 1997, NeuroImage.

[2]  E. Evarts.  Activity of pyramidal tract neurons during postural fixation. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  W. T. Thach.  Correlation of neural discharge with pattern and force of muscular activity, joint position, and direction of intended next movement in motor cortex and cerebellum. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Strother,et al.  Scaled Subprofile Model: A Statistical Approach to the Analysis of Functional Patterns in Positron Emission Tomographic Data , 1987, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Multivariate Predictive Relationship between Kinematic and Functional Activation Patterns in a PET Study of Visuomotor Learning , 2000, NeuroImage.

[6]  E. Tulving,et al.  Age‐related differences in effective neural connectivity during encoding and recall , 1997, Neuroreport.

[7]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Activation pattern reproducibility: Measuring the effects of group size and data analysis models , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Nonlinear versus Linear Models in Functional Neuroimaging: Learning Curves and Generalization Crossover , 1997, IPMI.

[9]  M. N. Rajah,et al.  Interactions of prefrontal cortex in relation to awareness in sensory learning. , 1999, Science.

[10]  A. Gjedde,et al.  Quantitative functional brain imaging with positron emission tomography , 1998 .

[11]  P. Herscovitch,et al.  Bolus Injection versus Slow Infusion of [15O]Water for Positron Emission Tomography Activation Studies , 1999, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[12]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Task-Independent Effect of Time on rCBF , 1998, NeuroImage.

[13]  J. Ashe.  Force and the motor cortex , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[16]  Peter Herscovitch,et al.  Comparison of PET [15O]Water Studies with 6-Minute and 10-Minute InterScan Intervals: Single-Subject and Group Analyses , 1999 .

[17]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Differential functional connectivity of prefrontal and medial temporal cortices during episodic memory retrieval , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Cerebral activation during the exertion of sustained static force in man , 1996, Neuroreport.

[19]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  A symbolic environment for visualizing activated foci in functional neuroimaging datasets , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography Using a Force-Related Paradigm , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing the Response of PET and fMRI Data Using Multivariate Linear Models , 1997, NeuroImage.

[22]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Measuring Activation Pattern Reproducibility Using Resampling Techniques , 1998 .

[23]  R. Passingham,et al.  Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  J R Moeller,et al.  A Regional Covariance Approach to the Analysis of Functional Patterns in Positron Emission Tomographic Data , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[25]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Detection of Thirty-Second Cognitive Activations in Single Subjects with Positron Emission Tomography: A New Low-Dose H215O Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Three-Dimensional Imaging Technique , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[26]  A M Dale,et al.  Randomized event‐related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI , 1998, Neuroreport.

[27]  R. Woods,et al.  Principal Component Analysis and the Scaled Subprofile Model Compared to Intersubject Averaging and Statistical Parametric Mapping: I. “Functional Connectivity” of the Human Motor System Studied with [15O]Water PET , 1995, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A Trial-Based Experimental Design for fMRI , 1997, NeuroImage.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A multivariate analysis of PET activation studies , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[30]  J. Ashe.  Erratum to “Force and the motor cortex” [Behavioural Brain Research 86 (1997) 1–15] 1 PII of original article: S0166-4328(96)00145-3 1 , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  S. C. Strother,et al.  Multidimensional state-spaces for fMRI and PET activation studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Is Multivariate Analysis of PET Data More Revealing Than the Univariate Approach? Evidence from a Study of Episodic Memory Retrieval , 1996, NeuroImage.

[33]  S. Strother,et al.  Reproducibility of BOLD‐based functional MRI obtained at 4 T , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Networks of domain-specific and general regions involved in episodic memory for spatial location and object identity , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Isometric force-related activity in sensorimotor cortex measured with functional MRI , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  D. Brillinger,et al.  Multivariate Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1964 .

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic Designs in Event-Related fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[38]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .