Effect of Continuous Urethro-Vesical Anastomosis Technique in Incontinence After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy, 1:1 Matching Study

Purpose: Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is an important step in radical prostatectomy and can affect clinical course in hospital. However, few studies comparing VUA by standard interrupted and continuous suturing techniques in radical retropubicprostatectomy (RRP) have been reported. We compared the postoperative outcomes and continence recovery rates of patients undergoing these two variations of VUA using 1:1 propensity score matching. Methods: From January 2008 to January 2014, a total of 188 patients underwent RRP. We conducted 1:1 propensity score matching based on age, prostate volume, pathological stage, status of nerve sparing, and two baseline characteristics (preoperative prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level and Gleason score determined by pathology). Patients were assigned to two groups based on the suturing method used (interrupted or continuous). After RRP, incontinence levels were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12months based on pad usage per day (0, dry; ≤1, social continence; ≥2, incontinence). Results: Each group consisted of 47 patients. The continuous group had a lower incidence of VUA site leakage (0% vs. 10.6%, P=0.022), but there were no significant differences in the rates of postoperative urethral stricture (6.4% vs. 6.4%, P=1.00) andpyuria (43.6% vs. 45.0%, P=0.770) between the two groups. The rate of recovery to social continence was greater in the continuous group at postoperative 3 months (85.1% vs. 66.0%, P=0.031). About 50% of patients had no incontinence (pad perday=0) after 6 months (59.6% in the continuous group and 51.1% in the interrupted group, P=0.407) and at postoperative 12 months, the dry rate 61.7% in the interrupted group and 80.4% in the continuous group (P=0.047). The times required toreach social continence (3.21 months vs. 3.77 months, P=0.056) and no incontinence (7.23 months vs. 7.63 months, P=0.132) were also shorter in the continuous group, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that earlier recovery to social continence and a higher rate of complete recovery (dry) could be expected with VUA by continuous suturing. Furthermore, if adequate surgical experience is accumulated, VUAwith continuous suturing could be performed without difficulty.

[1]  P. Atasoy,et al.  Continence recovery time after radical prostatectomy: implication of prostatic apical tumor. , 2013, Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology.

[2]  Joon Chul Kim,et al.  Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence , 2012, Korean journal of urology.

[3]  T. Nyberg,et al.  Age at surgery, educational level and long‐term urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy , 2011, BJU international.

[4]  R. Herwig,et al.  Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: the patient perspective. , 2011, The Canadian journal of urology.

[5]  N. Bryan,et al.  Technical description and outcomes of a continuous anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy , 2009, BJU international.

[6]  D. Teber,et al.  Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2008, World Journal of Urology.

[7]  P. Carroll,et al.  Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume--analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[8]  L. Harpster,et al.  Initial results using a running vesicourethral anastomosis following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[9]  M. Menon,et al.  The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy , 2004, BJU international.

[10]  V. Protogerou,et al.  Vesicourethral Anastomotic Strictures after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: The Experience of a Single Institution , 2004, Urologia Internationalis.

[11]  Ralph V Clayman,et al.  Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. , 2003, Urology.

[12]  C. Abbou,et al.  Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[13]  F. Marshall,et al.  Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[14]  B. Surya,et al.  Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[15]  Herbert Lepor,et al.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Anatomical and pathological considerations , 1983, The Prostate.