ORCHIMIC (v1.0), a microbe-mediated model for soil organic matter decomposition

Abstract. The role of soil microorganisms in regulating soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition is of primary importance in the carbon cycle, in particular in the context of global change. Modeling soil microbial community dynamics to simulate its impact on soil gaseous carbon (C) emissions and nitrogen (N) mineralization at large spatial scales is a recent research field with the potential to improve predictions of SOM responses to global climate change. In this study we present a SOM model called ORCHIMIC, which utilizes input data that are consistent with those of global vegetation models. ORCHIMIC simulates the decomposition of SOM by explicitly accounting for enzyme production and distinguishing three different microbial functional groups: fresh organic matter (FOM) specialists, SOM specialists, and generalists, while also implicitly accounting for microbes that do not produce extracellular enzymes, i.e., cheaters. ORCHIMIC and two other organic matter decomposition models, CENTURY (based on first-order kinetics and representative of the structure of most current global soil carbon models) and PRIM (with FOM accelerating the decomposition rate of SOM), were calibrated to reproduce the observed respiration fluxes of FOM and SOM from the incubation experiments of Blagodatskaya et al. (2014). Among the three models, ORCHIMIC was the only one that effectively captured both the temporal dynamics of the respiratory fluxes and the magnitude of the priming effect observed during the incubation experiment. ORCHIMIC also effectively reproduced the temporal dynamics of microbial biomass. We then applied different idealized changes to the model input data, i.e., a 5 K stepwise increase of temperature and/or a doubling of plant litter inputs. Under 5 K warming conditions, ORCHIMIC predicted a 0.002 K−1 decrease in the C use efficiency (defined as the ratio of C allocated to microbial growth to the sum of C allocated to growth and respiration) and a 3 % loss of SOC. Under the double litter input scenario, ORCHIMIC predicted a doubling of microbial biomass, while SOC stock increased by less than 1 % due to the priming effect. This limited increase in SOC stock contrasted with the proportional increase in SOC stock as modeled by the conventional SOC decomposition model (CENTURY), which can not reproduce the priming effect. If temperature increased by 5 K and litter input was doubled, ORCHIMIC predicted almost the same loss of SOC as when only temperature was increased. These tests suggest that the responses of SOC stock to warming and increasing input may differ considerably from those simulated by conventional SOC decomposition models when microbial dynamics are included. The next step is to incorporate the ORCHIMIC model into a global vegetation model to perform simulations for representative sites and future scenarios.

[1]  D. Schimel Carbon and nitrogen turnover in adjacent grassland and cropland ecosystems , 1986 .

[2]  W. Parton,et al.  Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands , 1987 .

[3]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Estimation of active soil microbial biomass by mathematical analysis of respiration curves: Calibration of the test procedure , 1987 .

[4]  H. Bozdogan Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[5]  W. Parton,et al.  Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model , 1988 .

[6]  P. Brookes,et al.  Survival of the soil microbial biomass at elevated temperatures , 1990 .

[7]  K van't Riet,et al.  Modeling of bacterial growth as a function of temperature , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[8]  Robert W. Howarth,et al.  Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur? , 1991 .

[9]  D. Jenkinson,et al.  Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming , 1991, Nature.

[10]  U. Schlagenhauf,et al.  Microbial generation time during the early phases of supragingival dental plaque formation. , 1995, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[11]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  N. Batjes,et al.  Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world , 1996 .

[13]  J. Cole,et al.  BACTERIAL GROWTH EFFICIENCY IN NATURAL AQUATIC SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[14]  A. Makower,et al.  Purification and characterization of the constitutive form of laccase from the basidiomycete Coriolus hirsutus and effect of inducers on laccase synthesis , 1998, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[15]  W. Horwath,et al.  Decomposition of rice straw and microbial carbon use efficiency under different soil temperatures and moistures , 2000 .

[16]  Jürgen K. Friedel,et al.  Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. , 2000 .

[17]  A. Gorissen,et al.  Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration: effects of increased carbon input in a Lolium perenne soil on microorganisms and decomposition , 2000 .

[18]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATE AND VEGETATION , 2000 .

[19]  M. Kaupenjohann,et al.  Sorption of dissolved organic carbon in soils: effects of soil sample storage, soil-to-solution ratio, and temperature , 2001 .

[20]  K. Svensson,et al.  Reversible transition between active and dormant microbial states in soil. , 2001, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[21]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model , 2003 .

[22]  L. Seymour,et al.  TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS, GROWTH RESPIRATION, AND MAINTENANCE RESPIRATION OF MARIGOLD , 2003 .

[23]  A. Mariotti,et al.  The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? , 2003 .

[24]  P. Nannipieri,et al.  Microbial diversity and soil functions , 2003 .

[25]  Paolo D'Odorico,et al.  Hydrologic controls on soil carbon and nitrogen cycles. II. A case study , 2003 .

[26]  Paolo D'Odorico,et al.  Hydrologic controls on soil carbon and nitrogen cycles. I. Modeling scheme , 2003 .

[27]  S. Linder,et al.  Feedback interactions between needle litter decomposition and rhizosphere activity , 2004, Oecologia.

[28]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[29]  S. Allison Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments , 2005 .

[30]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs , 2005 .

[31]  P. Cox,et al.  Global climate change and soil carbon stocks; predictions from two contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil , 2005 .

[32]  S. Sohn,et al.  Modification of Langmuir isotherm in solution systems--definition and utilization of concentration dependent factor. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[33]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  The effect of soil water content, soil temperature, soil pH-value and the root mass on soil CO2 efflux – A modified model , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[34]  B. Marschner,et al.  Priming effects in different soil types induced by fructose, alanine, oxalic acid and catechol additions , 2005 .

[35]  Y. Kuzyakov,et al.  Sources and mechanisms of priming effect induced in two grassland soils amended with slurry and sugar , 2006 .

[36]  D. Stott,et al.  Stabilization and incorporation into biomass of specific plant carbons during biodegradation in soil , 1983, Plant and Soil.

[37]  E. Davidson,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change , 2006, Nature.

[38]  D. Moorhead,et al.  A THEORETICAL MODEL OF LITTER DECAY AND MICROBIAL INTERACTION , 2006 .

[39]  J. Six,et al.  Bacterial and Fungal Contributions to Carbon Sequestration in Agroecosystems , 2006 .

[40]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Optimizing a process‐based ecosystem model with eddy‐covariance flux measurements: A pine forest in southern France , 2007 .

[41]  P. Bodegom Microbial Maintenance: A Critical Review on Its Quantification , 2007, Microbial Ecology.

[42]  T. Moore,et al.  Adsorption of dissolved organic carbon to mineral soils: A comparison of four isotherm approaches , 2008 .

[43]  Y. Kuzyakov,et al.  Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review , 2008, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[44]  R. Conant,et al.  Patterns of substrate utilization during long-term incubations at different temperatures , 2008 .

[45]  K. Ekschmitt,et al.  Stabilization mechanisms of organic matter in four temperate soils: Development and application of a conceptual model , 2008 .

[46]  Amilcare Porporato,et al.  Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales , 2009 .

[47]  J. Neff,et al.  Does adding microbial mechanisms of decomposition improve soil organic matter models? A comparison of four models using data from a pulsed rewetting experiment , 2009 .

[48]  S. Mohammad,et al.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of adsorption of cadusafos on soils. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[49]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition , 2010 .

[50]  N. Zeng,et al.  Enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake in the Northern High Latitudes in the 21st century from the Coupled Carbon Cycle Climate Model Intercomparison Project model projections , 2010 .

[51]  K. Soudani,et al.  Increase in aboveground fresh litter quantity over-stimulates soil respiration in a temperate deciduous forest , 2010 .

[52]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology , 2010 .

[53]  Scott C. Thomas,et al.  Effect of temperature on metabolic activity of intact microbial communities: Evidence for altered metabolic pathway activity but not for increased maintenance respiration and reduced carbon use efficiency , 2011 .

[54]  J. Subke,et al.  Dynamics and pathways of autotrophic and heterotrophic soil CO2 efflux revealed by forest girdling , 2011 .

[55]  J. Lennon,et al.  Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[56]  Craig C. Brandt,et al.  Relation between Soil Order and Sorption of Dissolved Organic Carbon in Temperate Subsoils , 2012 .

[57]  E. Davidson,et al.  The Dual Arrhenius and Michaelis–Menten kinetics model for decomposition of soil organic matter at hourly to seasonal time scales , 2012 .

[58]  J. Randerson,et al.  Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations , 2012 .

[59]  K.,et al.  Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2012 .

[60]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Ecoenzymatic Stoichiometry and Ecological Theory , 2012 .

[61]  C. Chenu,et al.  Evidence that stable C is as vulnerable to priming effect as is more labile C in soil. , 2012 .

[62]  W. Post,et al.  Parameter estimation for models of ligninolytic and cellulolytic enzyme kinetics , 2012 .

[63]  W. Riley,et al.  A total quasi-steady-state formulation of substrate uptake kinetics in complex networks and an example application to microbial litter decomposition , 2013 .

[64]  E. Blagodatskaya,et al.  Active microorganisms in soil: Critical review of estimation criteria and approaches , 2013 .

[65]  J. Randerson,et al.  Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by Earth system models during the 21 st century , 2013 .

[66]  W. Post,et al.  Development of microbial-enzyme-mediated decomposition model parameters through steady-state and dynamic analyses. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[67]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Ecosystem model optimization using in situ flux observations: Benefit of Monte Carlo versus variational schemes and analyses of the year-to-year model performances , 2013 .

[68]  P. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the Land and Ocean Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2013 .

[69]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems , 2013 .

[70]  J. Randerson,et al.  Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by Earth system models during the 21st century , 2013 .

[71]  C. Schadt,et al.  Representation of Dormant and Active Microbial Dynamics for Ecosystem Modeling , 2013, PloS one.

[72]  S. Allison,et al.  Elemental stoichiometry of Fungi and Bacteria strains from grassland leaf litter , 2014 .

[73]  William R. Wieder,et al.  Integrating microbial physiology and physio-chemical principles in soils with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model , 2014 .

[74]  S. Blagodatsky,et al.  Microbial interactions affect sources of priming induced by cellulose , 2014 .

[75]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay , 2014, Ecology letters.

[76]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Evaluation and improvement of a global land model against soil carbon data using a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method , 2014 .

[77]  Paul Dijkstra,et al.  Accelerated microbial turnover but constant growth efficiency with warming in soil , 2014 .

[78]  P. Ciais,et al.  Towards a representation of priming on soil carbon decomposition in the global land biosphere model ORCHIDEE (version 1.9.5.2) , 2015 .

[79]  A. McGuire,et al.  Incorporating microbial dormancy dynamics into soil decomposition models to improve quantification of soil carbon dynamics of northern temperate forests , 2015 .

[80]  I. Janssens,et al.  Priming of soil organic matter decomposition scales linearly with microbial biomass response to litter input in steppe vegetation , 2015 .

[81]  Matthew J. Smith,et al.  Responses of two nonlinear microbial models to warming and increased carbon input , 2015 .

[82]  William J. Riley,et al.  Weaker soil carbon–climate feedbacks resulting from microbial and abiotic interactions , 2015 .

[83]  J. Sanderman,et al.  Microbial community structure mediates response of soil C decomposition to litter addition and warming , 2015 .

[84]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Carbon cycle feedbacks and future climate change , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[85]  Jinyun Tang On the relationships between the Michaelis–Menten kinetics, reverse Michaelis–Menten kinetics, equilibrium chemistry approximation kinetics, and quadratic kinetics , 2015 .

[86]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Social dynamics within decomposer communities lead to nitrogen retention and organic matter build-up in soils , 2015, Nature Communications.

[87]  Qianxi Li,et al.  Microbial community mediated response of organic carbon mineralization to labile carbon and nitrogen addition in topsoil and subsoil , 2016, Biogeochemistry.

[88]  P. Ciais,et al.  Quantifying uncertainties of permafrost carbon–climate feedbacks , 2017 .

[89]  J. Schimel,et al.  Estimating decay dynamics for enzyme activities in soils from different ecosystems , 2017 .

[90]  J. Harte,et al.  Microbial community-level regulation explains soil carbon responses to long-term litter manipulations , 2017, Nature Communications.