Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities

The purpose of the experiments was to demonstrate an attentional-blink (AB) effect in a visual second task following the processing of a simple auditory signal. Subjects monitored a stream of letters presented at the middle of a computer screen using rapid serial visual presentation for the presence of a visual target (an X or a Y). In experimental trials, the visual target followed a pure tone that required an immediate speeded-choice response. When the tone had to be processed, accuracy in the visualencoding task suffered a marked and prolonged deficit that was timelocked to the onset of the tone. When the tone could be ignored or when no tone was presented, no deficit was observed in the visual task. The results demonstrate a cross-modal AB effect produced by a simple two-choice auditory discrimination task. The results are consistent with the view that at least part of the AB effect has a central, amodal, postperceptual locus.

[1]  J. P. Hylan,et al.  A Study of the Accuracy of the Present Methods of Testing Fatigue. , 1905 .

[2]  R. Davis,et al.  The Role of “Attention” in the Psychological Refractory Period , 1959 .

[3]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[4]  H. Pashler Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[8]  R. Jong,et al.  Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[10]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation , 1994 .

[12]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[13]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  S. Martens,et al.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities , 1997, Nature.

[15]  M C Potter,et al.  Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  P. Jolicoeur Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[18]  K. Arnell,et al.  The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations. , 1999 .

[19]  Pierre Jolickur Concurrent Response-Selection Demands Modulate the Attentional Blink , 1999 .