Seismic Design of Steel Frames Equipped by Control Devices

The design philosophy of EC8 is to ensure that in the event of the design earthquake, human lives are protected and no collapse will occur, while extended damages will be observed. This is achieved by ductility and capacity design. This design philosophy drives to an additional cost for repairing damage of structures. On the other hand, it is costly and uneconomic to design structures behaving in elastic range, especially under high level of earthquake excitation. An alter- native direction to this strategy, which is examined in this paper, is to design a controlled structure capable to resist a de- sign earthquake loads, remaining in elastic range and thus without damage. The idea behind this philosophy is that one portion of earthquake loading will be resisted by a control system while the rest will be resisted by the structure. The structure, initially, is analyzed and designed according to the current codes. The elastic and design earthquake forces are first calculated according to the elastic and the design spectrum. The required control forces are calculated as the differ- ence between elastic and design forces. The maximum value of capacity of control devices is then compared with the re- quired control force. If the capacity of the controlled devices is higher than the required control force then the control de- vices are accepted and installed to the structure. Then, the structure is designed according to the design forces. In the case where the maximum available control device capacity is lower than the demanded control force then an additional portion of control forces should be resisted by the building. In that case, an iterative procedure is proposed and a scale factor, � , that reduces the elastic response spectrum to a new design spectrum, is calculated. The structure is redesigned based on the new design spectrum and then the devices are installed to the structure. The proposed procedure imposes that the con- trolled structure will behave elastically for the design earthquake and no damage will occur, consequently no additional repair cost will be needed. An initial cost of buying and installing the control devices is required. In order to ensure that the controlled structure behaves elastically, a dynamic control analysis with saturation and time delay control is per- formed. Following the proposed procedure the numerical results show that the structure remains in elastic and no damage occurs.

[1]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control : Part II : Active tendon system , 1998 .

[2]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Theory of plastic mechanism control of dissipative truss moment frames , 2012 .

[3]  Takuji Kobori,et al.  Seismic response controlled structure with Active Variable Stiffness system , 1993 .

[4]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Active, Hybrid, and Semi-active Structural Control: A Design and Implementation Handbook , 2005 .

[5]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Innovative structural details in MR-frames for free from damage structures , 2014 .

[6]  Anne Nagel Active Hybrid And Semi Active Structural Control A Design And Implementation Handbook , 2016 .

[7]  Francesco Marazzi,et al.  Technology of Semiactive Devices and Applications in Vibration Mitigation , 2006 .

[8]  T. Igusa,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering by Anil K. Chopra , 1996 .

[9]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[10]  Takuji Kobori,et al.  Reliability of Applied Semiactive Structural Control System , 2003 .

[11]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Plastic Design of Seismic Resistant V-Braced Frames , 2008 .

[12]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Theory of plastic mechanism control for the seismic design of braced frames equipped with friction dampers , 2014 .

[13]  The Math Works, Inc. The Math Works Inc , 1991, International Conference on Advances in System Simulation.

[15]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[16]  Lan Chung,et al.  Improved design of sliding mode control for civil structures with saturation problem , 2004 .

[17]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Experimental and Analytical Study of a Hybrid Isolation System Using Friction Controllable Sliding Bearings , 1992 .

[18]  J. N. Yang,et al.  Sliding Mode Control for Seismically Excited Linear Structures , 1995 .

[19]  Giorgio Serino,et al.  Testing and modelling a semi‐actively controlled steel frame structure equipped with MR dampers , 2004 .

[20]  Charis J. Gantes,et al.  Design and control algorithm for structures equipped with active variable stiffness devices , 2009 .

[21]  F. Mazzolani,et al.  PLASTIC DESIGN OF SEISMIC RESISTANT STEEL FRAMES , 1997 .

[22]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Failure Mode Control and Seismic Response of Dissipative Truss Moment Frames , 2012 .

[23]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Theory of plastic mechanism control for eccentrically braced frames with inverted y-scheme , 2014 .

[24]  M. C. Constantinou,et al.  SEMI-ACTIVE FLUID VISCOUS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE CONTROL by , 2004 .

[25]  Marina Schroder,et al.  Structural Control Past Present And Future , 2016 .

[26]  Chao Wang,et al.  Modified sliding-mode bang–bang control for seismically excited linear structures , 2000 .

[27]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  Optimal integrated design of controlled structures , 2008 .

[28]  Jann N. Yang,et al.  Application of Optimal Control Theory to Civil Engineering Structures , 1975 .

[29]  Jianbo Lu,et al.  Covariance control using closed-loop modelling for structures , 1997 .

[30]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[31]  Bartłomiej Błachowski Model based predictive control of guyed mast vibration , 2007 .

[32]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Maximum damping forces for structures with viscous dampers under near-source earthquakes , 2014 .

[33]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Failure Mode Control of X-Braced Frames Under Seismic Actions , 2008 .

[34]  Νικόλαος Γ. Πνευματικός,et al.  Maximum damping forces for structures with viscous dampers under near-source earthquakes , 2015 .

[35]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control: part I—Active Mass Driver system , 1998 .

[36]  J. N. Yang,et al.  Sliding Mode Control for Nonlinear and Hysteretic Structures , 1995 .