The value of online surveys: a look back and a look ahead

The purpose of this paper is to present a detailed and critical look at the evolution of online survey research since Evans and Mathur’s (2005) article on the value of online surveys. At that time, online survey research was in its early stages. Also covered are the present and future states of online research. Many conclusions and recommendations are presented.,The look back focuses on online surveys, strengths and weaknesses of online surveys, the literature on several aspects of online surveys and online survey best practices. The look ahead focuses on emerging survey technologies and methodologies, and new non-survey technologies and methodologies. Conclusions and recommendations are provided.,Online survey research is used more frequently and better accepted by researchers than in 2005. Yet, survey techniques are still regularly transformed by new technologies. Non-survey digital research is also more prominent than in 2005 and can better track actual behavior than surveys can. Hybrid surveys will be widespread in the future.,The paper aims to provide insights for researchers with different levels of online survey experience. And both academics and practitioners should gain insights.,Adhering to a strong ethics code is vital to gain respondents’ trust and to produce valid results.,Conclusions and recommendations are offered in these specific areas: defining concepts, understanding the future role of surveys, developing and implementing surveys and a survey code of ethics. The literature review cites more than 200 sources.

[1]  N. Raassens,et al.  NPS and Online WOM , 2017, Journal of service research.

[2]  Tarmo Virtanen,et al.  Smartphone GPS tracking—Inexpensive and efficient data collection on recreational movement , 2017 .

[3]  Joel R. Evans,et al.  The value of online surveys , 2005, Internet Res..

[4]  Chang Hee Park Online Purchase Paths and Conversion Dynamics across Multiple Websites , 2017 .

[5]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Perceived Critical Mass and Collective Intention in Social Media-supported Small Group Communication , 2022 .

[6]  Yijun Liu,et al.  Exploring the diversity of retweeting behavior patterns in Chinese microblogging platform , 2017, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[8]  Prem Prakash Jayaraman,et al.  Big Data Reduction Methods: A Survey , 2016, Data Science and Engineering.

[9]  Katie M. Abrams,et al.  Online Focus Groups , 2008 .

[10]  T. Guin,et al.  Myths and Realities of Respondent Engagement in Online Surveys , 2012 .

[11]  Christopher E. Beaudoin,et al.  Smoking Prevention in China: A Content Analysis of an Anti-Smoking Social Media Campaign , 2016, Journal of health communication.

[12]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  A Process for Developing an Optimal Model For Reducing Bias in Nonprobability Samples , 2016, Journal of Advertising Research.

[13]  Fabiola Baltar,et al.  ‘Ready to complete the survey on Facebook’ , 2013 .

[14]  Oded Netzer,et al.  MTurk Character Misrepresentation: Assessment and Solutions , 2017 .

[15]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Tweeting to Feel Connected: A Model for Social Connectedness in Online Social Networks , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  James F. Hahn Chapter 1. The Internet of Things (IoT) and Libraries , 2017 .

[18]  Harald Schoen,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Removing “Too Fast” Responses and Respondents from Web Surveys , 2015 .

[19]  Shu-Ching Chen,et al.  Multimedia Big Data Analytics , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[20]  Uzair Ahmad,et al.  HarVis: An integrated social media content analysis framework for YouTube platform , 2017, Inf. Syst..

[21]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Predicting the “helpfulness” of online consumer reviews , 2017 .

[22]  C. Spitzmueller,et al.  UNDERSTANDING RESPONSE BEHAVIOR TO AN ONLINE SPECIAL TOPICS ORGANIZATIONAL SATISFACTION SURVEY , 2006 .

[23]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  The Ethics of Internet Research , 2008 .

[24]  Katja Lozar Manfreda,et al.  The effect of email invitation elements on response rate in a web survey within an online community , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  V. Smith,et al.  Does reputation enhance response rates? , 2017 .

[26]  R. Ahas,et al.  The use of tracking technologies in tourism research: the first decade , 2016 .

[27]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions , 2017 .

[28]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers' online shopping decision , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Jari Salo,et al.  Social media research in the industrial marketing field: Review of literature and future research directions , 2017 .

[30]  P. Hanna Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: a research note , 2012 .

[31]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Use of Survey Research in Top Mass Communication Journals 2001–2010 And the Total Survey Error Paradigm , 2015 .

[32]  Hunter Gehlbach,et al.  Using the Theory of Satisficing to Evaluate the Quality of Survey Data , 2011, Research in Higher Education.

[33]  Boriss A. Siliverstovs,et al.  Google Trends and reality: Do the proportions match?: Appraising the informational value of online search behavior: Evidence from Swiss tourism regions , 2016 .

[34]  Christine Strauss,et al.  Panel surveys go mobile , 2008, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[35]  Kimberly A. Barchard,et al.  Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[36]  Mingnan Liu,et al.  Examining Completion Rates in Web Surveys via Over 25,000 Real-World Surveys , 2018 .

[37]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Authentic versus fictitious online reviews: A textual analysis across luxury, budget, and mid-range hotels , 2017, J. Inf. Sci..

[38]  Sayan Kumar Ray,et al.  Secure routing for internet of things: A survey , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[39]  Choon-Ling Sia,et al.  Is This Review Believable? A Study of Factors Affecting the Credibility of Online Consumer Reviews from an ELM Perspective , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Klaus Solberg Søilen,et al.  The perception of useful information derived from Twitter: A survey of professionals , 2017 .

[41]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  New Developments in Survey Data Collection , 2017 .

[42]  Murtaza Haider,et al.  Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[43]  Florian Keusch The Role of Topic Interest and Topic Salience in Online Panel Web Surveys , 2013 .

[44]  Dirk Heerwegh,et al.  Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys: An Experimental Investigation of Data Quality and Social Desirability Effects , 2009 .

[45]  Lotteries and Study Results in Market Research Online Panels , 2013 .

[46]  David C. Yen,et al.  Need for Affiliation, Need for Popularity, Self-Esteem, and the Moderating Effect of Big Five Personality Traits Affecting Individuals’ Self-Disclosure on Facebook , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Joseph Goodman,et al.  Crowdsourcing Consumer Research , 2017 .

[48]  In Lee,et al.  Big data: Dimensions, evolution, impacts, and challenges , 2017 .

[49]  Chris Kimble,et al.  Big Data and Business Intelligence: Debunking the Myths , 2015, ArXiv.

[50]  D. Cantor,et al.  How Much Gets You How Much? Monetary Incentives and Response Rates in Household Surveys , 2015 .

[51]  Olena Kaminska,et al.  The Impact of Mobile Phones on Survey Measurement Error , 2013 .

[52]  Lior Fink,et al.  Analyzing online consumer behavior in mobile and PC devices: A novel web usage mining approach , 2017, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[53]  Yanqing Duan,et al.  Factors affecting active participation in B2B online communities: An empirical investigation , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[54]  Hajar Mousannif,et al.  Data quality in internet of things: A state-of-the-art survey , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[55]  Roger Clarke,et al.  Big data, big risks , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[56]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  Sun Young Lee,et al.  Messages on CSR-dedicated Facebook pages: What works and what doesn’t , 2017 .

[58]  Matthias Emde Open-ended questions in Web surveys - Using visual and adaptive questionnaire design to improve narrative responses , 2014 .

[59]  Courtney Kennedy,et al.  Evaluating a new proposal for detecting data falsification in surveys: The underlying causes of ``high matches'' between survey respondents , 2016 .

[60]  I. Pecáková Pitfalls of Quantitative Surveys Online , 2016 .

[61]  You Can't Put a Price Tag on A Survey Participant's Enjoyment , 2013, Journal of Advertising Research.

[62]  Trent D. Buskirk,et al.  Apples to Oranges or Gala versus Golden Delicious?Comparing Data Quality of Nonprobability Internet Samples to Low Response Rate Probability Samples , 2017 .

[63]  M. Revilla,et al.  Quality of Different Scales in an Online Survey in Mexico and Colombia , 2015 .

[64]  Girish N. Punj Consumer intentions to falsify personal information online: unethical or justifiable? , 2017 .

[65]  Jeffrey Meyer,et al.  Getting in touch with your thinking style: How touchscreens influence purchase , 2017 .

[66]  M. J. Pedersen,et al.  Improving Survey Response Rates in Online Panels , 2016 .

[67]  Adam W. Meade,et al.  Careless response and attrition as sources of bias in online survey assessments of personality traits and performance , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[68]  M. Wiese,et al.  Dynamite in small packages: the Engaged Elite as an Facebook emerging niche market , 2017 .

[69]  Carlos Ochoa,et al.  Do online access panels need to adapt surveys for mobile devices? , 2016, Internet Res..

[70]  Jaehyun Park,et al.  Development of a web-based survey system for evaluating affective satisfaction , 2011 .

[71]  M. Galesic,et al.  Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey , 2009 .

[72]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Whose and What Social Media Complaints Have Happier Resolutions? Evidence from Twitter , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Morgan M. Millar,et al.  Improving Response To Web and Mixed-Mode Surveys , 2011 .

[74]  Sung-Hyuk Park,et al.  A Social Network-Based Inference Model for Validating Customer Profile Data , 2012, MIS Q..

[75]  R. Kozinets The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities , 2002 .

[76]  Mario Callegaro,et al.  Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels , 2008 .

[77]  Michael E. Whitcomb,et al.  Mixed-Mode Contacts In Web Surveys Paper is Not Necessarily Better , 2007 .

[78]  Jeeyeon Kim,et al.  Mobile Shopping through Applications: Understanding Application Possession and Mobile Purchase , 2016 .

[79]  Bjørg Helen Nøstvold,et al.  Hybrid Surveys: A Method for the Effective Use of Open-Ended Questions in Quantitative Food Choice Surveys , 2018 .

[80]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  When things matter: A survey on data-centric internet of things , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[81]  Leah Melani Christian,et al.  The Influence of Topic Interest and Interactive Probing on Responses to Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys , 2009 .

[82]  Gregory Baatard,et al.  A Technical Guide to Effective and Accessible web Surveys , 2012 .

[83]  Leesa Costello,et al.  Netnography , 2017 .

[84]  P. Miller Is There a Future for Surveys , 2017 .

[85]  Timothy J. Mavin,et al.  Experiencing Resilience via Video Games , 2017 .

[86]  Yavuz Akbulut,et al.  Predictors of inconsistent responding in web surveys , 2015, Internet Res..

[87]  E. Buchanan,et al.  Internet Research Ethics , 2012 .

[88]  Norm Archer,et al.  Raising the Cohesion and Vitality of Online Communities by Reducing Privacy Concerns , 2017, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[89]  Ming Hsu,et al.  Neuromarketing: Inside the Mind of the Consumer , 2017 .

[90]  Bo Sophia Xiao,et al.  Do actions speak louder than voices? The signaling role of social information cues in influencing consumer purchase decisions , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[91]  Othman Ibraheem Alsalloum,et al.  Self-Disclosure in Social Networking Sites in Saudi Arabia , 2018 .

[92]  Dino Zanon,et al.  Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for public participation geographic information systems surveys , 2012 .

[93]  Karin Braunsberger,et al.  A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys. , 2007 .

[94]  Yongqiang Sun,et al.  Recommendations from Friends Anytime and Anywhere: Toward a Model of Contextual Offer and Consumption Values , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[95]  Sergio Mauceri Integrating quality into quantity: survey research in the era of mixed methods , 2016 .

[96]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Harvesting Brand Information from Social Tags , 2017 .

[97]  Kelly Wakefield,et al.  Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers , 2014 .

[98]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  The Role of Big Data and Predictive Analytics in Retailing , 2017 .

[99]  Xueying Zhang,et al.  Persuading Me to Eat Healthy: A Content Analysis of YouTube Public Service Announcements Grounded in the Health Belief Model , 2017 .

[100]  P. Ting,et al.  Using Big Data and Text Analytics to Understand How Customer Experiences Posted on Yelp.com Impact the Hospitality Industry , 2017 .

[101]  Matthew L. Jensen,et al.  Prominence and Interpretation of Online Conflict of Interest Disclosures , 2017, MIS Q..

[102]  Yue Liu User control of personal information concerning mobile-app: Notice and consent? , 2014, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[103]  Chetna Dabas Big data analytics for exploratory social network analysis , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[104]  Johan Martinsson,et al.  Recruiting an Online Panel from another Online Survey: Consequences of Framing and Placement of the Recruitment Question , 2016 .

[105]  Zhifeng Gao,et al.  Respondent Screening and Revealed Preference Axioms: Testing Quarantining Methods for Enhanced Data Quality in Web Panel Surveys , 2015 .

[106]  MODE AND VISUALIZATION EFFECTS IN ONLINE MARKETING RESEARCH , 2005 .

[107]  Kenneth R. Baker,et al.  An Optimal Contact Model for Maximizing Online Panel Response Rates , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[108]  Z. Ahmad,et al.  CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ONLINE NEWS PORTAL: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES , 2017 .

[109]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  Effects of Mobile versus PC Web on Survey Response Quality , 2017 .

[110]  Liyin Jin Improving Response Rates in Web Surveys with Default Setting: The Effects of Default on Web Survey Participation and Permission , 2011 .

[111]  Bill Page,et al.  Fundamental patterns of in-store shopper behavior , 2017 .

[112]  D. Yeager,et al.  Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples , 2011 .

[113]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Big Data in Survey Research AAPOR Task Force Report , 2015 .

[114]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Completion rates and non-response error in online surveys: Comparing sweepstakes and pre-paid cash incentives in studies of online behavior , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[115]  S. Chang,et al.  Cultivating the brand-customer relationship in Facebook fan pages: a study of fast- fashion industry , 2017 .

[116]  David Stewart,et al.  Online Focus Groups , 2017 .

[117]  Scott M. Smith,et al.  The Impact of Two-Stage Highly Interesting Questions on Completion Rates and Data Quality in Online Marketing Research , 2012 .

[118]  K. Manfreda,et al.  Web Surveys versus other Survey Modes: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates , 2008 .

[119]  Sean Carlisto de Alvarenga,et al.  A survey of intrusion detection in Internet of Things , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[120]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  An empirical investigation of information sharing behavior on social commerce sites , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[121]  Cornelia Zuell,et al.  Item non-response in open-ended questions: Who does not answer on the meaning of left and right? , 2012, Social science research.

[122]  E. Buchanan,et al.  Online Survey Tools: Ethical and Methodological Concerns of Human Research Ethics Committees , 2009, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[123]  Umut Konuş,et al.  Better customer insight - in real time , 2012 .

[124]  Mario Callegaro,et al.  Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys , 2014 .

[125]  Matthew Motta,et al.  Looking for Answers: Identifying Search Behavior and Improving Knowledge-Based Data Quality in Online Surveys , 2016 .

[126]  Logan Kugler Keeping online reviews honest , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[127]  Zach W. Y. Lee,et al.  Self-disclosure in social networking sites: The role of perceived cost, perceived benefits and social influence , 2015, Internet Res..

[128]  David C. Li,et al.  Online social network acceptance: a social perspective , 2011, Internet Res..

[129]  M. Cooke,et al.  Web 2.0, Social Networks and the Future of Market Research , 2008 .

[130]  S. Seitz Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: a research note , 2016 .

[131]  Efrem Castelnuovo,et al.  Google It Up! A Google Trends-Based Uncertainty Index for the United States and Australia , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[132]  H. Stipp What 80 Years of Study Means For the Future of Advertising Research , 2016, Journal of Advertising Research.

[133]  Arnaud Wijnant,et al.  Improving Response Rates and Questionnaire Design for Mobile Web Surveys , 2014 .

[134]  Mohammad Salehan,et al.  Predicting the performance of online consumer reviews: A sentiment mining approach to big data analytics , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[135]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  The Dark Side of Reviews: The Swaying Effects of Online Product Reviews on Attribute Preference Construction , 2017, MIS Q..

[136]  Maximilian D. Schmeiser,et al.  The Effect of Large Monetary Incentives on Survey CompletionEvidence from a Randomized Experiment with the Survey of Consumer Finances , 2017 .

[138]  Elisabeth Brüggen,et al.  Determinants of Participation and Response Effort in Web Panel Surveys , 2009 .

[139]  P. Biemer Total Survey Error: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation , 2010 .

[140]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  Survey-Research Paradigms Old and New , 2013 .

[141]  Neil A. Morelli,et al.  Establishing the Measurement Equivalence of Online Selection Assessments Delivered on Mobile Versus Nonmobile Devices , 2014 .

[142]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Opening up open-ended survey data using qualitative software , 2013 .

[143]  M. Roach,et al.  Increasing Web Survey Response Rates in Innovation Research: An Experimental Study of Static and Dynamic Contact Design Features , 2012 .

[144]  Parthasarati Dileepan,et al.  A SWOT analysis of big data , 2016 .

[145]  Valerie M. Sue,et al.  Planning the Online Survey , 2007 .

[146]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Big data: From beginning to future , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[147]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Online versus phone surveys: comparison of results for a bicycling survey , 2014 .

[148]  Madjid Fathi,et al.  Knowledge discovery from social media using big data-provided sentiment analysis (SoMABiT) , 2015, J. Inf. Sci..

[149]  Klaus Moessner,et al.  A Survey on Mobile Social Signal Processing , 2016, ACM Comput. Surv..

[150]  Noi Sukaviriya,et al.  Predicting cognitive states from wearable recordings of autonomic function , 2017, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[151]  Alan J. Tomkins,et al.  Citizen Satisfaction Survey Data , 2012 .

[152]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  An Assessment of Equivalence Between Online and Mail Surveys in Service Research , 2006 .

[153]  H. Bansal,et al.  Shorter Interviews, Longer Surveys: Optimising the Survey Participant Experience While Accommodating Ever Expanding Client Demands , 2017 .

[154]  Zoltán Fazekas Is it what you say , or how you say it ? An experimental analysis of the effects of invitation wording for online , 2013 .

[155]  Bart Baesens,et al.  Call for Papers MISQ Special Issue on Transformational Issues of Big Data and Analytics in Networked Business , 2014 .

[156]  D. Resnik What Is Ethics in Research and Why Is It Important , 2011 .

[157]  A. Singh,et al.  Creating online surveys: some wisdom from the trenches tutorial , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[158]  Jolene D. Smyth,et al.  Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys Can Increasing the Size of Answer Boxes and Providing Extra Verbal Instructions Improve Response Quality? , 2009 .

[159]  A. Woodside,et al.  How Contextual Cues Impact Response and Conversion Rates of Online Surveys , 2014 .

[160]  R. Thakur,et al.  A comparative study of corporate user-generated media behavior: Cross-cultural B2B context , 2018, Industrial Marketing Management.

[161]  Scott M. Smith,et al.  Effect of Topic Sensitivity on Online Survey Panelists’ Motivation and Data Quality , 2017 .

[162]  K. Petrie,et al.  “What say ye gout experts?” a content analysis of questions about gout posted on the social news website Reddit , 2017, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[163]  Adamu I. Abubakar,et al.  Online fake news detection algorithm , 2017 .

[164]  C. Peeters,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Design of Online Surveys for Measuring Unethical Work Behavior: Recommendations on the Basis of a Split-Ballot Experiment , 2014 .

[165]  Steven G. Jones,et al.  Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee , 2004 .

[166]  Hakan Kılınç,et al.  Opinions of Expert Academicians on Online Data Collection and Voluntary Participation in Social Sciences Research , 2017 .

[167]  Carol Galais,et al.  Answering Without Reading: IMCs and Strong Satisficing in Online Surveys , 2016 .

[168]  Megan A. Moreno,et al.  Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[169]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  How online social interactions influence customer information contribution behavior in online social shopping communities: A social learning theory perspective , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[170]  Nicole Martins,et al.  On the Street: A Content Analysis of Body Imagery in Streetstyle Fashion Blogs , 2017 .

[171]  Tom Wells What Market Researchers Should Know about Mobile Surveys , 2015 .

[172]  Mingli Zhang,et al.  The Online Reviews' Effects on Internet Consumer Behavior: An Exploratory Study , 2017, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[173]  William Jen,et al.  Click “Like” on Facebook: The Effect of Customer-to-customer Interaction on Customer Voluntary Performance for Social Networking Sites , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[174]  Bella Struminskaya Respondent Conditioning in Online Panel Surveys , 2016 .

[175]  M. Couper Is the sky falling? new technology, changing media, and the future of surveys , 2013 .

[176]  Shintaro Okazaki,et al.  Assessing mobile-based online surveys: methodological considerations and pilot study in an advertising context , 2007 .

[177]  Scott Clifford,et al.  Cheating on Political Knowledge Questions in Online Surveys An Assessment of the Problem and Solutions , 2016 .

[178]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  A Method for Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-mode Surveys , 2010 .

[179]  Zoltán Fazekas,et al.  Is It What You Say, or How You Say It? An Experimental Analysis of the Effects of Invitation Wording for OnlinePanel Surveys , 2014 .

[180]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Mobile App Analytics: A Multiple Discrete-Continuous Choice Framework , 2016, MIS Q..

[181]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  A Comparison of the Quality of Questions in a Face-to-face and a Web Survey , 2013 .

[182]  Ewa Maslowska,et al.  Brand marketing, big data and social innovation as future research directions for engagement , 2016 .

[183]  Micah Murphy,et al.  Communication, interactivity, and satisfaction in B2B relationships , 2018 .