Cortical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: Channel Interactions

This study examined the interactions between electrical stimuli presented through two channels of a cochlear implant. Experiments were conducted in anesthetized guinea pigs. Multiunit spike activity recorded from the auditory cortex reflected the cumulative effects of electric field interactions in the cochlea as well as any neural interactions along the ascending auditory pathway. The cochlea was stimulated electrically through a 6-electrode intracochlear array. The stimulus on each channel was a single 80-µs/phase biphasic pulse. Channel interactions were quantified as changes in the thresholds for elevation of cortical spike rates. Experimental parameters were interchannel temporal offset (0 to ±2000 µs), interelectrode cochlear spacing (1.5 or 2.25 mm), electrode configuration (monopolar, bipolar, or tripolar), and relative polarity between channels (same or inverted). In most conditions, presentation of a subthreshold pulse on one channel reduced the threshold for a pulse on a second channel. Threshold shifts were greatest for simultaneous pulses, but appreciable threshold reductions could persist for temporal offsets up to 640 µs. Channel interactions varied strongly with electrode configuration: threshold shifts increased in magnitude in the order tripolar, bipolar, monopolar. Channel interactions were greater for closer electrode spacing. The results have implications for design of speech processors for cochlear implants.

[1]  Single-Fiber Recording , 2004 .

[2]  Scott Budd Chapman Dynes.  Discharge characteristics of auditory nerve fibers for pulsatile electrical stimuli , 1996 .

[3]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[4]  R. Hellman,et al.  Relation between the growth of loudness and high-frequency excitation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  F G Zeng,et al.  Binaural Loudness Matches in Unilaterally Impaired Listeners , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  W M Jenkins,et al.  BIOPHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  K. A. Davis,et al.  Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus of decerebrate cats. I. Classification based on frequency response maps. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Responses of Cat Auditory Nerve Fibers to Biphasic Electrical Current Pulses , 1987 .

[9]  G. Shepherd.  The Synaptic Organization of the Brain , 1979 .

[10]  Francis Kuk,et al.  Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: Audiologic assessment and predictors of performance , 1988, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  O D Creutzfeldt,et al.  Functional subdivisions in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Effects of perilymphatic perfusion with neomycin on the cochlear microphonic potential in the guinea pig. , 1977, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  K. Wise,et al.  Performance of planar multisite microprobes in recording extracellular single-unit intracortical activity , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[16]  M. White,et al.  A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: pulse-train response , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Coding of Sound-Source Location by Ensembles of Cortical Neurons , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor design. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[19]  Shigeto Furukawa,et al.  Auditory Cortical Images of Tones and Noise Bands , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[20]  Susan B. Waltzman,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Study of Cochlear Implants , 1993 .

[21]  S. Shamma,et al.  Organization of response areas in ferret primary auditory cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation , 2000, Hearing Research.

[23]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[24]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[26]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents , 1998, Hearing Research.

[27]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[28]  H J McDermott,et al.  The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  SAS-CIS Preference Study in Postlingually Deafened Adults Implanted with the Clarion® Cochlear Implant , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[30]  J. Ruppersberg.  Ion Channels in Excitable Membranes , 1996 .

[31]  G M Clark,et al.  Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  J K Shallop,et al.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[33]  F. C. Hellweg,et al.  Representation of the cochlea in the neocortex of guinea pigs , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  K. Wise,et al.  A high-yield IC-compatible multichannel recording array , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[35]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Alan R. Palmer,et al.  Identification and localisation of auditory areas in guinea pig cortex , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  C. Jolly,et al.  Quadrupolar stimulation for cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  Susan Zimmerman-Phillips,et al.  Programming Features of the Clarion® Multi-Strategy™ Cochlear Implant , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[39]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  C. Parkins,et al.  Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys , 1989, Hearing Research.

[41]  J. Reswick,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation : applications in neural prostheses , 1977 .

[42]  Reinier Plomp,et al.  Aspects of tone sensation , 1976 .

[43]  B M Clopton,et al.  Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[44]  H J McDermott,et al.  Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[46]  B. Hille.  Ionic channels of excitable membranes , 2001 .

[47]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS)–Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS) Pilot Comparison Study in Europe , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[48]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.