A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management

ContextConflict over land use is endemic to natural resource management given the limited availability of resources and multiple stakeholders’ interests, but there has been limited research to examine conflict from an integrative social-ecological perspective.ObjectivesWe sought to determine how the potential for land use conflict—a social construct—was related (or not) to ecological systems of landscapes.MethodsUsing participatory mapping data from a regional case study in Australia, we identified the potential for land use conflict using a model that combines spatially-explicit place values with preferences for specific land uses related to development and conservation. Multiple proxies of biodiversity were used to evaluate the landscape’s ecological systems at ecosystems and species levels. Range maps were used to identify areas of high species diversity value using the conservation planning software Zonation.ResultsWe spatially intersected conflict areas with landscape attributes and found the potential for conflict over conservation to be higher in coastal areas than inland areas, more likely to be located in areas with moderate vegetation cover, more concentrated in ecosystems classified as ‘No Concern’ with moderate to high native vegetation. Potential conflict over conservation was disproportionately higher in areas with higher species diversity derived from conservation modelling.ConclusionsThe social-ecological associations in conflict analysis can inform impact assessment of land use plans on biodiversity, assist development of effective approaches to reconcile conservation and other land uses, support conservation planning by identifying priorities for conflict negotiation and understanding underlying factors for conflict.

[1]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[2]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Social learning: a knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes , 2011 .

[3]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[4]  Greg Brown,et al.  Methods and participatory approaches for identifying social-ecological hotspots , 2015 .

[5]  J. M. Bavinck,et al.  The governance perspective , 2005 .

[6]  P. Gleick.  Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security , 1993 .

[7]  F. Steiner,et al.  Comprehensive consideration of conflicts in the land-use planning process: A conceptual contribution , 2015 .

[8]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Integrating Biological and Social Values When Prioritizing Places for Biodiversity Conservation , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[10]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Services : Exploring a Geographical Perspective , 2022 .

[11]  D. Bengston,et al.  Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States , 2004 .

[12]  David R. Godschalk,et al.  Land Use Planning Challenges: Coping with Conflicts in Visions of Sustainable Development and Livable Communities , 2004 .

[13]  R. Bruce Hull,et al.  Beyond Biology: toward a More Public Ecology for Conservation , 2001 .

[14]  R. Schreyer,et al.  Conflict in outdoor recreation: a theoretical perspective. , 1980 .

[15]  R. Hill,et al.  A social–ecological systems analysis of impediments to delivery of the Aichi 2020 Targets and potentially more effective pathways to the conservation of biodiversity , 2015 .

[16]  Scott D. Campbell,et al.  Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable , 1996 .

[17]  Svein Jentoft,et al.  Fish for life - Interactive governance for fisheries , 2005 .

[18]  S. Díaz,et al.  Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being , 2006, PLoS biology.

[19]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[20]  S. Brody,et al.  Identifying Potential Conflict Associated with Oil and Gas Exploration in Texas State Coastal Waters: A Multicriteria Spatial Analysis , 2006, Environmental management.

[21]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[22]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Conflicts between decentralized renewable electricity production and landscape services – a spatially-explicit quantitative assessment for Switzerland , 2017 .

[23]  Manasi Kumar,et al.  Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective , 2008 .

[24]  C. Raymond,et al.  Using social data in strategic environmental assessment to conserve biodiversity , 2015 .

[25]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  Linking multiple accounts with GIS as decision support system to resolve forestry/wildlife conflicts , 1994 .

[26]  C. Folke,et al.  Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems , 2004, Environmental management.

[27]  J. Vaske,et al.  Interpersonal versus social‐values conflict , 1995 .

[28]  Artti Juutinen,et al.  Identifying Environmental and Natural Resource Management Conflict Potential Using Participatory Mapping , 2017 .

[29]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[30]  J. Vaske,et al.  Clarifying Interpersonal and Social Values Conflict among Recreationists , 2007 .

[31]  E. Ruiz-Ballesteros.  Social-ecological resilience and community-based tourism: An approach from Agua Blanca, Ecuador , 2011 .

[32]  F. Berkes,et al.  Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity , 2009 .

[33]  Harry F. Recher,et al.  A review of current ideas of the extinction, conservation and management of Australia's terrestrial vertebrate fauna , 1990 .

[34]  Greg Brown,et al.  Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping , 2014 .

[35]  Michael T. Klare,et al.  Resource Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict , 2001 .

[36]  J. Magnuson,et al.  An integrated conceptual framework for long‐term social–ecological research , 2011 .

[37]  Claude A. Garcia,et al.  Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Gregory Brown,et al.  Escaping the national forest planning quagmire: using public participation GIS to assess acceptable national forest use , 2013 .

[39]  Greg Brown,et al.  Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land use preferences in Norway , 2015 .

[40]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Mapping Human and Social Dimensions of Conservation Opportunity for the Scheduling of Conservation Action on Private Land , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  C. Geitner,et al.  Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts , 2015 .

[42]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems , 2004 .

[43]  Greg Brown,et al.  The extrapolation of social landscape values to a national level in New Zealand using landscape character classification , 2012 .

[44]  N. Crossman,et al.  Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? , 2010 .

[45]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Zonation: Spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.0 user manual , 2011 .

[46]  Dan Clark,et al.  Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social–ecological decision-making: Benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity , 2012 .