Criticality Assessment Models for Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic

Traditional Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has shown its effectiveness in defining, identifying, and eliminating known and/or potential failures or problems in products, process, designs, and services to help ensure the safety and reliability of systems applied in a wide range of industries. However, its approach to prioritize failure modes through a crisp risk priority number (RPN) has been highly controversial. This paper proposes two models for prioritizing failures modes, specifically intended to overcome such limitations of traditional FMEA. The first proposed model treats the three risk factors as fuzzy linguistic variables, and employs alpha level sets to provide a fuzzy RPN. The second model employs an approach based on the degree of match and fuzzy rule-base. This second model considers the diversity and uncertainty in the opinions of FMEA team members, and converts the assessed information into a convex normalized fuzzy number. The degree of match (DM) is used thereafter to estimate the matching between the assessed information and the fuzzy number characterizing the linguistic terms. The proposed models are suitably supplemented by illustrative examples.

[1]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling , 2005 .

[2]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[3]  J. B. Bowles,et al.  Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  H. S. Kushwaha,et al.  A New Uncertainty Importance Measure in Fuzzy Reliability Analysis , 2009 .

[6]  Kuo-Ping Lin,et al.  A Comparison of Discrete Algorithms for Fuzzy Weighted Average , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[7]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Fuzzy modelling and analytical hierarchy processing as a means of quantifying risk levels associated with failure modes in production systems , 2000 .

[8]  Wen-Kuei Lee,et al.  Risk assessment modeling in aviation safety management , 2006 .

[9]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis , 2003 .

[10]  Loon Ching Tang,et al.  Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  Nune Ravi Sankar,et al.  Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis , 2001 .

[13]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Centroid defuzzification and the maximizing set and minimizing set ranking based on alpha level sets , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[14]  Timothy J. Ross Monotone Measures: Belief, Plausibility, Probability, and Possibility , 2010 .

[15]  Chee Peng Lim,et al.  Application of Fuzzy Inference Techniques to FMEA , 2004, WSC.

[16]  Ashok Deshpande,et al.  Can fuzzy logic bring complex environmental problems into focus , 2005 .

[17]  E. N. Dialynas,et al.  Reliability prediction and failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) of electronic devices using fuzzy logic , 2005 .

[18]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis , 2003 .

[19]  Chiu-Chi Wei,et al.  FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS USING FUZZY METHOD AND GREY THEORY , 1999 .

[20]  Moamar Sayed Mouchaweh,et al.  VARIABLE PROBABILITY-POSSIBILITY TRANSFORMATION , 2006 .

[21]  Jin Wang,et al.  Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  T. R. Moss,et al.  Criticality analysis revisited , 1999 .

[23]  Thomas E. McKone,et al.  Can fuzzy logic bring complex problems into focus? Modeling imprecise factors in environmental policy , 2004 .