Effects of Passage Type on Comprehension Monitoring and Recall in Good and Poor Readers

An error detection paradigm was used to assess the effects of passage type on students' comprehension monitoring and recall of texts. Good and poor readers in the sixth grade (M age =12 years, 0 months) read inconsistent expository and narrative passages presented one sentence at a time. On- and off-line measures (reading times and verbal reports of passage inconsistencies) were used to examine students' comprehension evaluation, and look-backs to inconsistencies during reading were used to measure comprehension regulation. Although all students detected problems on-line, good readers were better able to verbally report on passage consistency following reading. Passage type affected regulation of understanding with students more likely to look back at inconsistencies in narratives but not expository passages. Students were more likely to reread expository passages, however, when passages did not contain problems and were less able to recall expository passage information. Implications for instruction and directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  J. Hummel,et al.  Causality and the allocation of attention during comprehension. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[3]  Sharon Benge Kletzien,et al.  Strategy Use by Good and Poor Comprehenders Reading Expository Text of Differing Levels. , 1991 .

[4]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Constraining factors in calibration of comprehension , 1990 .

[5]  Connie A. Bridge,et al.  Readers' Awareness of Cohesive Relationships during Cloze Comprehension , 1982 .

[6]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions , 1984 .

[7]  P. Tun,et al.  Age differences in processing expository and narrative text. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[8]  Bonnie B. Armbruster.  Does Text Structure/Summarization Instruction Facilitate Learning from Expository Text? Technical Report No. 394. , 1986 .

[9]  Peter Johnston,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring and the Error Detection Paradigm , 1982 .

[10]  Esther Geva,et al.  Use of Conjunctions in Expository Texts by Skilled and Less Skilled Readers , 1985 .

[11]  Hillel Goelman.  Selective attention in language comprehension: Children's processing of expository and narrative discourse∗ , 1982 .

[12]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Calibration of Comprehension , 1985 .

[13]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Memory search without interference: The role of integration , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Thomas H. Anderson,et al.  An Investigation of Lookbacks During Studying , 1979 .

[15]  Elizabeth B. Bernhardt.  Three Approaches to Reading Comprehension in Intermediate German , 1983 .

[16]  S. Duffy,et al.  Degree of causal relatedness and memory , 1987 .

[17]  Sigmund Tobias,et al.  Mandatory Text Review and Interaction with Student Characteristics. , 1987 .

[18]  Allison D. Brennan,et al.  The Effects of Structural Variation on Children's Recall of Basal Reader Stories. , 1986 .

[19]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  A program for comprehension monitoring of text using HyperCard for the Macintosh , 1988 .

[20]  Hilary Horn Ratner,et al.  Effects of Reading Ability on Children's Comprehension Evaluation and Regulation , 1989 .

[21]  Randolph K. Cirilo.  Referential coherence and text structure in story comprehension , 1981 .

[22]  H. Ratner,et al.  Children's comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent stories. , 1986 .

[23]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Reading difficulties : instruction and assessement , 1988 .

[24]  The text, the student, and the teacher: Learning from exposition in middle schools , 1986 .

[25]  Ruth Garner,et al.  Good and Poor Comprehender Differences in Knowing and Regulating Reading Behaviors. , 1981 .

[26]  C. Spring.  Comprehension and study strategies reported by university freshmen who are good and poor readers , 1985 .

[27]  Karen Zabrucky.  The role of factual coherence in discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[28]  Alan M. Lesgold,et al.  Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension , 1979 .

[29]  T. Petros,et al.  Effects of text genre and verbal ability on adult age differences in sensitivity to text structure. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[30]  D. Forrest-Pressley,et al.  Metacognition, cognition, and human performance , 1985 .

[31]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  Children's Ability to Use Three Standards to Evaluate Their Comprehension of Text. , 1989 .

[32]  John B. Black,et al.  Causal coherence and memory for events in narratives , 1981 .