Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs.

The prediction of the effects of disturbances in natural systems is limited by the general lack of knowledge on the strength of species interactions, i.e., the effect of one species on the population growth rate of another, and by the uncertainty of the effects that may be manifested via indirect pathways within the food web. Here we explored the consequences of changes in species populations for the remaining species within nine exceptionally well-characterized empirical food webs, for which, unlike the vast majority of other published webs, feeding links have been fully quantified. Using the inverse of the Jacobian matrix, we found that perturbations to species with few connections have larger net effects (considering both direct and indirect pathways between two species) on the rest of the food web than do disturbances to species that are highly connected. For 40% of predator-prey links, predators had positive net effects on prey populations, due to the predominance of indirect interactions. Our results highlight the fundamental, but often counterintuitive, role of indirect effects for the maintenance of food web complexity and biodiversity.

[1]  A. Neutel,et al.  Energetics, Patterns of Interaction Strengths, and Stability in Real Ecosystems , 1995, Science.

[2]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Cascading extinctions and ecosystem functioning: contrasting effects of diversity depending on food web structure , 2007 .

[3]  M. Emmerson,et al.  Predator–prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web , 2004 .

[4]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[5]  R. Paine A Note on Trophic Complexity and Community Stability , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Markov chain models predict the consequences of experimental extinctions , 2004 .

[7]  K. McCann The diversity–stability debate , 2000, Nature.

[8]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Predators that Benefit Prey and Prey that Harm Predators: Unusual Effects of Interacting Foraging Adaptation , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Anje-Margriet Neutel,et al.  Stability in Real Food Webs: Weak Links in Long Loops , 2002, Science.

[11]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[12]  Raffaelli,et al.  Defining the abundance body-size constraint space: data from a real food web , 1999 .

[13]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[14]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  B. Ebenman,et al.  Keystone species and vulnerable species in ecological communities: strong or weak interactors? , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  M. Emmerson,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF INTERACTION STRENGTH IN NATURE , 2005 .

[17]  R. Macarthur Fluctuations of Animal Populations and a Measure of Community Stability , 1955 .

[18]  Tomas Jonsson,et al.  Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs , 2000 .

[19]  P. Yodzis,et al.  DIFFUSE EFFECTS IN FOOD WEBS , 2000 .

[20]  R. Solé,et al.  Topological properties of food webs: from real data to community assembly models Oikos 102 , 2003 .

[21]  L. Milne,et al.  The Balance of Nature , 1953, Oryx.

[22]  A. Hastings,et al.  Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature , 1998, Nature.

[23]  B. Menge,et al.  Indirect Effects in Marine Rocky Intertidal Interaction Webs: Patterns and Importance , 1995 .

[24]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[25]  B. Ebenman,et al.  Using community viability analysis to identify fragile systems and keystone species. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Quantification and Resolution of a Complex, Size-Structured Food Web , 2005 .

[27]  Johan van de Koppel,et al.  Reconciling complexity with stability in naturally assembling food webs , 2007, Nature.

[28]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Stability and Diversity of Ecosystems , 2007, Science.

[29]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Body size in ecological networks. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  P. Yodzis The Indeterminacy of Ecological Interactions as Perceived Through Perturbation Experiments , 1988 .

[31]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  SIMPLE TROPHIC MODULES FOR COMPLEX FOOD WEBS , 2005 .

[32]  H. W. Hunt,et al.  Calculation of nitrogen mineralization in soil food webs , 1993, Plant and Soil.

[33]  J. Wootton Indirect effects in complex ecosystems: recent progress and future challenges , 2002 .

[34]  John Harte,et al.  Response of complex food webs to realistic extinction sequences. , 2007, Ecology.

[35]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities , 2004 .

[36]  R D Holt,et al.  Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  Anna Eklöf,et al.  Species loss and secondary extinctions in simple and complex model communities. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[38]  G. Woodward,et al.  Body size, interaction strength and food web dynamics , 2005 .