Deep Harmonization of Inconsistent MR Data for Consistent Volume Segmentation

Magnetic resonance image analysis is often hampered by inconsistent data due to upgrades or changes to the scanner platform or modification of scanning protocols. These changes can manifest in three main sources of image inconsistency: contrast, resolution, and noise. Modern analysis techniques that use supervised machine learning can be especially susceptible to these inconsistencies, as existing training data may not be valid after an upgrade or protocol change. In previous work, differences in contrast and resolution have been addressed in isolation. We propose a novel method of image intensity harmonization that addresses each of the three sources of inconsistency. We formulate our method around a multi-planar, multi-contrast U-net, where all of the available contrasts are used as input channels in a single modified U-Net to produce all of the output contrasts simultaneously. The multi-contrast nature of the deep network allows for harmonization of contrast as information can be shared between contrasts. In addition, coherent, biological features are highlighted and matched to the target, while noise, which differs between matched inputs and outputs, is not reinforced. This process also normalizes small differences in resolution due to the influence of the high resolution channels. To combat larger differences in resolution, which would not be recovered by the neural network alone, we use self super-resolution (SSR) on all images with thick (>2 mm) slices before harmonization. To generate consistent images, the target images are also processed in a similar manner so that all resulting images have consistent qualities. Our harmonization process eliminates significant volume bias of multiple brain compartments and lesion estimation. In addition, absolute volume difference and Dice similarity of segmentation volumes were significantly improved (\(p<0.005\)). SSR alone did not affect the statistical significance of the difference, even though the absolute volume difference was reduced.

[1]  D. Reich,et al.  Volumetric Analysis from a Harmonized Multisite Brain MRI Study of a Single Subject with Multiple Sclerosis , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  Russell T. Shinohara,et al.  Removing inter-subject technical variability in magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2016, NeuroImage.

[3]  J. Gee,et al.  The Insight ToolKit image registration framework , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[4]  Sotirios A. Tsaftaris,et al.  Multimodal MR Synthesis via Modality-Invariant Latent Representation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  A Deep Learning Based Anti-aliasing Self Super-Resolution Algorithm for MRI , 2018, MICCAI.

[6]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  A topology-preserving approach to the segmentation of brain images with multiple sclerosis lesions , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Removing Camera Shake via Weighted Fourier Burst Accumulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multi-Atlas Segmentation with Joint Label Fusion , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  Random forest regression for magnetic resonance image synthesis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  A Compressed Sensing Approach for MR Tissue Contrast Synthesis , 2011, IPMI.

[12]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: Resource and challenge , 2017, NeuroImage.

[13]  François Rousseau,et al.  Brain Hallucination , 2008, ECCV.

[14]  Rui Wang,et al.  Skeletal Shape Correspondence Through Entropy , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  Robust skull stripping using multiple MR image contrasts insensitive to pathology , 2017, NeuroImage.

[16]  Hayit Greenspan,et al.  Multi-view longitudinal CNN for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation , 2017, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[17]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Aaron Carass,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation and Labeling from CT Using Synthetic MR Images , 2017, MLMI@MICCAI.