Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Semiparametric methods provide smooth and continuous receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve fits to ordinal test results and require only that the data follow some unknown monotonic transformation of the model's assumed distributions. The quantitative relationship between cutoff settings or individual test-result values on the data scale and points on the estimated ROC curve is lost in this procedure, however. To recover that relationship in a principled way, we propose a new algorithm for "proper" ROC curves and illustrate it by use of the proper binormal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Several authors have proposed the use of multinomial distributions to fit semiparametric ROC curves by maximum-likelihood estimation. The resulting approach requires nuisance parameters that specify interval probabilities associated with the data, which are used subsequently as a basis for estimating values of the curve parameters of primary interest. In the method described here, we employ those "nuisance" parameters to recover the relationship between any ordinal test-result scale and true-positive fraction, false-positive fraction, and likelihood ratio. Computer simulations based on the proper binormal model were used to evaluate our approach in estimating those relationships and to assess the coverage of its confidence intervals for realistically sized datasets. RESULTS In our simulations, the method reliably estimated simple relationships between test-result values and the several ROC quantities. CONCLUSION The proposed approach provides an effective and reliable semiparametric method with which to estimate the relationship between cutoff settings or individual test-result values and corresponding points on the ROC curve.

[1]  Maryellen L Giger,et al.  Prevalence scaling: applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[2]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[3]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of the threshold at an operating point on the ROC curve , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[4]  Lorenzo L. Pesce,et al.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[5]  J. C. Ogilvie,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic curve parameters , 1968 .

[6]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[7]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[8]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[9]  J A Swets,et al.  Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  J. Swets Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Yulei Jiang,et al.  A scaling transformation for classifier output based on likelihood ratio: applications to a CAD workstation for diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[13]  J. Hanley Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. , 1989, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[14]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. , 2002, Medical physics.

[15]  M. Kendall,et al.  Kendall's advanced theory of statistics , 1995 .

[16]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[17]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[18]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. , 2001, Medical physics.

[19]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .

[21]  Lorenzo L. Pesce,et al.  Repeatability in computer-aided diagnosis: Application to breast cancer diagnosis on sonography. , 2010, Medical physics.

[22]  J. Hanley The Robustness of the "Binormal" Assumptions Used in Fitting ROC Curves , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[23]  Brani Vidakovic,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics with Applications to Science and Engineering (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 2007 .

[24]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[25]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[26]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[27]  C. Metz,et al.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation. , 1999, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[28]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[29]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  M. Giger,et al.  Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. , 2005, Radiology.