Patient Choice and Patient Empowerment in Northern European Health Systems: A Conceptual Framework

The issue of patient choice presents a complicated challenge to publicly operated health systems. Increased patient choice can strengthen the citizen's commitment to traditional welfare state objectives, or alternatively, it can severely damage that commitment, depending upon the design of the choice mechanism and the structural context within which patient choice occurs. For patient choice to be linked to true empowerment, choice must reinforce rather than undercut the accountability of health care providers to the population they serve. This article explores the basic issues involved in empowering patients within publicly operated health systems. The author first reviews the conceptual components that could or should be incorporated within the notion of empowered patients, then examines what would be required to actually empower patients within health systems, defined in terms of expanding not only logistical choice but also clinical influence and decision-making participation. The article concludes with a wide-ranging analysis of the impact of potential policies and mechanisms on the long-term objectives of achieving democratically accountable health care systems.

[1]  Richard B. Saltman,et al.  Planned Markets and Public Competition: Strategic Reform in Northern European Health Systems , 1992 .

[2]  A Bowling,et al.  Social support and social networks: their relationship to the successful and unsuccessful survival of elderly people in the community. An analysis of concepts and a review of the evidence. , 1991, Family practice.

[3]  R. Saltman,et al.  Towards a Swedish health policy for the 1990s: planned markets and public firms. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[4]  A O Frank,et al.  Terminal cancer care and patients' preference for place of death: a prospective study. , 1990, BMJ.

[5]  D. Mark,et al.  Does quality influence choice of hospital? , 1990, JAMA.

[6]  P. Lewis,et al.  Britain's new market model of general practice: do consumers know enough to make it work? , 1990, Health policy.

[7]  R. Saltman,et al.  Implementing public competition in Swedish county councils: a case study. , 1990, The International journal of health planning and management.

[8]  D. Aldridge The Delivery of Health Care Alternatives: Discussion Paper , 1990, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[9]  R. Saltman,et al.  Voice, Choice and the Question of CMI Democracy in the Swedish Welfare State , 1989 .

[10]  R. Saltman,et al.  Public competition versus mixed markets: an analytic comparison. , 1989, Health policy.

[11]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Mastectomy or conservation: the patient's choice. , 1988, BMJ.

[12]  E. Faltermayer Medical care's next revolution. , 1988, Fortune.

[13]  J. Higgins The Business of Medicine: Private Health Care in Britain , 1988 .

[14]  J. Higgins The Business of Medicine: Private Health Care in Britain , 1988 .

[15]  R. Saltman,et al.  Re-vitalizing public health care systems: a proposal for public competition in Sweden. , 1987, Health policy.

[16]  David W. Young,et al.  The Hospital Power Equilibrium: Physician Behavior and Cost Control , 1985 .

[17]  D. Horne A survey of patients in the private sector. , 1984, The Hospital and health services review.

[18]  T. Marmor,et al.  Representing consumer interests: imbalanced markets, health planning, and the HSAs. , 1980, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society.

[19]  C. W. Dunham A Consumer’s View , 1979 .

[20]  K. Andrews The Concept of Corporate Strategy , 1971 .

[21]  C. B. Macpherson,et al.  The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke , 1963 .