THE EFFECT OF BIASED INCLUSION OF TAXA ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN DISCRETE CHARACTERS IN PHYLOGENETIC TREES

In a published paper, a method for testing the correlation between two discrete characters was presented and applied to test whether in butterfly larvae origins of gregariousness are concentrated to lineages with aposematic coloration. The relationship was found to be nonsignificant. However, the butterfly data on which the test was applied had been compiled in another study to investigate evolutionary sequences and was biased, because there was an overrepresentation of aposematic, as compared to cryptic, branches in the sample. In the paper presented here, aposematic and cryptic clades of the original phylogeny were resolved to the same degree, and the resulting set of branches may be regarded as unbiased with respect to the hypothesis being tested. A method for testing the contingency of states in two characters was then applied to the new data set, resulting in a highly significant relationship between origins of gregariousness and aposematic coloration. I argue that when using statistical methods on phylogenetic data, it is crucial to resolve various parts of the phylogeny to the same comparable systematic unit in order not to get a distorted sample of taxa/branches.