An automated method for the extraction of regional data from PET images

Manual drawing of regions of interest (ROIs) on brain positron emission tomography (PET) images is labour intensive and subject to intra- and inter-individual variations. To standardize analysis and improve the reproducibility of PET measures, we have developed image analysis software for automated quantification of PET data. The method is based on the individualization of a set of standard ROIs using a magnetic resonance (MR) image co-registered with the PET image. To evaluate the performance of this automated method, the software-based quantification has been compared with conventional manual quantification of PET images obtained using three different PET radiotracers: [(11)C]-WAY 100635, [(11)C]-raclopride and [(11)C]-DASB. Our results show that binding potential estimates obtained using the automated method correlate highly with those obtained by trained raters using manual delineation of ROIs for frontal and temporal cortex, thalamus, and striatum (global intraclass correlation coefficient >0.8). For the three radioligands, the software yields time-activity data that are similar (within 8%) to those obtained by manual quantification, eliminates investigator-dependent variability, considerably shortens the time required for analysis and thus provides an alternative method for accurate quantification of PET data.

[1]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  3D Anatomical Atlas of the Human Brain , 1998, NeuroImage.

[2]  Robert B. Innis,et al.  Development and Reliability of a Method for Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Definition of Regions of Interest for Positron Emission Tomography. , 1998, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[3]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.

[4]  T. Greitz,et al.  Adjustable computerized stereotaxic brain atlas for transmission and emission tomography. , 1983, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  Ulla Ruotsalainen,et al.  Extracting VOIs from brain PET images , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  Makoto Inoue,et al.  Template-Based Method for Multiple Volumes of Interest of Human Brain PET Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  N Tanizaki,et al.  Semi-automatic ROI placement system for analysis of brain PET images based on elastic model: application to diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. , 2000, The Keio journal of medicine.

[10]  Felix M Mottaghy,et al.  Improving binding potential analysis in [11C]raclopride PET studies using cluster analysis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Incorporating Prior Knowledge into Image Registration , 1997, NeuroImage.

[12]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Automatic 3‐D model‐based neuroanatomical segmentation , 1995 .

[14]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[15]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in human brain PET images using probability maps , 2005, NeuroImage.

[16]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[17]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  R. Downey,et al.  Intraclass Correlations: There's More There Than Meets the Eye , 1983 .

[19]  T Greitz,et al.  Specification and Selection of Regions of Interest (ROIs) in a Computerized Brain Atlas , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  T. Greitz,et al.  A computerized brain atlas: construction, anatomical content, and some applications. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  A computerized system for the elastic matching of deformed radiographic images to idealized atlas images. , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[23]  John Duncan,et al.  Implementation and application of a brain template for multiple volumes of interest , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[25]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[26]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[27]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  MRI-PET Correlation in Three Dimensions Using a Volume-of-Interest (VOI) Atlas , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.