Quantitative Analysis of Evolvability using Vertex Centralities in Phenotype Network

In an evolutionary system, robustness describes the resilience to mutational and environmental changes, whereas evolvability captures the capability of generating novel and adaptive phenotypes. The research literature has not seen an effective quantification of phenotypic evolvability able to predict the evolutionary potential of the search for novel phenotypes. In this study, we propose to characterize the mutational potential among different phenotypes using the phenotype network, where vertices are phenotypes and edges represent mutational connections between them. In the framework of such a network, we quantitatively analyze the evolvability of phenotypes by exploring a number of vertex centrality measures commonly used in complex networks. In our simulation studies we use a Linear Genetic Programming system and a population of random walkers. Our results suggest that the weighted eigenvector centrality serves as the best estimator of phenotypic evolvability.

[1]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Evolvability , 2009, JACM.

[2]  Malcolm I. Heywood,et al.  A Linear Genetic Programming Approach to Intrusion Detection , 2003, GECCO.

[3]  Victor Ciesielski,et al.  Linear genetic programming , 2008, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[4]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  The Ascent of the Abundant: How Mutational Networks Constrain Evolution , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  The centrality index of a graph , 1966 .

[6]  P. Schuster,et al.  Generic properties of combinatory maps: neutral networks of RNA secondary structures. , 1997, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[7]  A. Wagner,et al.  Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  Cartesian genetic programming , 2000, GECCO '10.

[9]  Bryan C. Daniels,et al.  Sloppiness, robustness, and evolvability in systems biology. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[10]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Adaptive evolution on neutral networks , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[11]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[12]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[13]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Acquiring evolvability through adaptive representations , 2007, GECCO '07.

[14]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Neutralism and selectionism: a network-based reconciliation , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  P. Schuster,et al.  From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  A comparison of linear genetic programming and neural networks in medical data mining , 2001, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  A. Wagner Robustness and evolvability: a paradox resolved , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  The Advantages of Landscape Neutrality in Digital Circuit Evolution , 2000, ICES.

[20]  M. Pigliucci Is evolvability evolvable? , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Franz Rothlauf,et al.  Redundant Representations in Evolutionary Computation , 2003, Evolutionary Computation.

[23]  Ting Hu,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on multiple scales: a quantitative analysis of the interplay between genotype, phenotype, and fitness in linear genetic programming , 2012, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[24]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[25]  Ting Hu,et al.  Robustness, Evolvability, and Accessibility in Linear Genetic Programming , 2011, EuroGP.

[26]  Aytac Guven,et al.  Linear genetic programming for time-series modelling of daily flow rate , 2009 .

[27]  G. Wagner,et al.  Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation , 2010, Nature.

[28]  Axel Bender,et al.  Degeneracy: a design principle for achieving robustness and evolvability. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[30]  I. G. BONNER CLAPPISON Editor , 1960, The Electric Power Engineering Handbook - Five Volume Set.

[31]  M. Newman Analysis of weighted networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Peter Nordin,et al.  Genetic programming - An Introduction: On the Automatic Evolution of Computer Programs and Its Applications , 1998 .

[33]  Yi Pan,et al.  CytoNCA: A cytoscape plugin for centrality analysis and evaluation of protein interaction networks , 2015, Biosyst..

[34]  A. Wagner Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality , 2005, FEBS letters.

[35]  P. Turner,et al.  Robustness promotes evolvability of thermotolerance in an RNA virus , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[36]  C. Ofria,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[37]  Yi Pan,et al.  Identification of Essential proteins from Weighted protein-protein Interaction Networks , 2013, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[38]  Ting Hu,et al.  Neutrality and variability: two sides of evolvability in linear genetic programming , 2009, GECCO.

[39]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  Through the Interaction of Neutral and Adaptive Mutations, Evolutionary Search Finds a Way , 2006, Artificial Life.

[40]  Ting Hu,et al.  The Effects of Recombination on Phenotypic Exploration and Robustness in Evolution , 2014, Artificial Life.

[41]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Balancing Robustness and Evolvability , 2006, PLoS biology.

[42]  Ting Hu,et al.  Robustness and Evolvability of Recombination in Linear Genetic Programming , 2013, EuroGP.

[43]  Meredith V. Trotter,et al.  Robustness and evolvability. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[44]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  An empirical investigation of how and why neutrality affects evolutionary search , 2006, GECCO '06.

[46]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[47]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Protein robustness promotes evolutionary innovations on large evolutionary time-scales , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  Genetic Programming: An Introduction , 1997 .

[49]  Scott A. Rifkin,et al.  Genetic Properties Influencing the Evolvability of Gene Expression , 2007, Science.

[50]  Terence Soule,et al.  Resilient Individuals Improve Evolutionary Search , 2006, Artificial Life.

[51]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Towards an empirical measure of evolvability , 2005, GECCO '05.