Examining temporal and spatial variations of internal temperature in large-format laminated battery with embedded thermocouples

Abstract Information on battery internal temperature is valuable to enhance the understanding of thermo-electrochemical reactions, to validate simulation models, and to refine battery thermal design. In this study, 12 thermocouples are embedded at strategically-chosen locations inside a 25 Ah laminated lithium-ion battery. Another 12 thermocouples are attached at the corresponding locations on the surface. The temporal and spatial variations of the temperature are measured at a series of discharge rates under different thermal conditions. The thermal response of these locations is also analyzed. The major findings include: First, the internal temperatures could differ from the surface for as large as 1.1 °C, even for a thin laminated cell. Second, the time constants of thermal response at the internal locations are generally dozens of seconds larger than on the surface. Third, the internal variation in the plane direction reaches above 10 °C under adiabatic 1.5 C discharge, much larger than in the through-plane direction, indicating the in-plane heat conductivity needs improvement. Finally, forced convection is effective to suppress the temperature rise as well as the variation. The direct measurement of internal temperature initiated in this study paves the way for implanting sensors/microchips in single cell to extract multiple physico-electrochemical signals simultaneously.

[1]  J. Selman,et al.  Passive control of temperature excursion and uniformity in high-energy Li-ion battery packs at high current and ambient temperature , 2008 .

[2]  Pierluigi Pisu,et al.  Comprehensive thermal modeling of a power-split hybrid powertrain using battery cell model , 2011 .

[3]  Dinh Vinh Do,et al.  Thermal modeling of a cylindrical LiFePO4/graphite lithium-ion battery , 2010 .

[4]  Zhe Li,et al.  Modeling the capacity degradation of LiFePO 4/graphite batteries based on stress coupling analysis , 2011 .

[5]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Cycling degradation of an automotive LiFePO4 lithium-ion battery , 2011 .

[6]  J. Selman,et al.  Active (air-cooled) vs. passive (phase change material) thermal management of high power lithium-ion packs: Limitation of temperature rise and uniformity of temperature distribution , 2008 .

[7]  Chi-Yuan Lee,et al.  In Situ Monitoring of Temperature inside Lithium-Ion Batteries by Flexible Micro Temperature Sensors , 2011, Sensors.

[8]  Xiangming He,et al.  Electro-thermal modeling and experimental validation for lithium ion battery , 2012 .

[9]  Chee Burm Shin,et al.  A two-dimensional modeling of a lithium-polymer battery , 2006 .

[10]  M. Verbrugge,et al.  Cycle-life model for graphite-LiFePO 4 cells , 2011 .

[11]  Weifeng Fang,et al.  Electrochemical–thermal modeling of automotive Li‐ion batteries and experimental validation using a three‐electrode cell , 2010 .

[12]  Stephen Yurkovich,et al.  Electro-thermal battery model identification for automotive applications , 2011 .

[13]  Herbert L Case,et al.  An accelerated calendar and cycle life study of Li-ion cells. , 2001 .

[14]  Fang-Bor Weng,et al.  In situ monitoring of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack using flexible micro temperature and voltage sensors , 2012 .

[15]  R. Mahamud,et al.  Reciprocating air flow for Li-ion battery thermal management to improve temperature uniformity , 2011 .

[16]  Yo Kobayashi,et al.  Cycle life estimation of Lithium secondary battery by extrapolation method and accelerated aging test , 2001 .