Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Two-Year Clinical Results of the COMFORTABLE AMI Trial

Background—This study sought to determine whether the 1-year differences in major adverse cardiac event between a stent eluting biolimus from a biodegradable polymer and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in the COMFORTABLE trial (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) were sustained during long-term follow-up. Methods and Results—A total of 1161 patients were randomly assigned to biolimus-eluting stent (BES) and BMS at 11 centers, and follow-up rates at 2 years were 96.3%. A subgroup of 103 patients underwent angiography at 13 months. At 2 years, differences in the primary end point of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization continued to diverge in favor of BES-treated patients (5.8%) compared with BMS-treated patients (11.9%; hazard ratio=0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.72; P<0.001) with a significant risk reduction during the second year of follow-up (hazard ratio 1–2 years=0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–1.00; P=0.049). Differences in the primary end point were driven by a reduction in target lesion revascularization (3.1% versus 8.2%; P<0.001) and target-vessel reinfarction (1.3% versus 3.4%; P=0.023). The composite of death, any reinfarction and revascularization (14.5% versus 19.3%; P=0.03), and cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (4.2% versus 7.2%; P=0.036) were less frequent among BES-treated patients compared with BMS-treated patients. The 13-month angiographic in-stent percent diameter stenosis amounted to 12.0±7.2 in BES- and 39.6±25.2 in BMS-treated lesions (P<0.001). Conclusions—Among patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, BES continued to improve cardiovascular events compared with BMS beyond 1 year. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NTC00962416.

[1]  P. Serruys,et al.  Everolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (EXAMINATION): 1 year results of a randomised controlled trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[2]  L. Räber,et al.  Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the COMFORTABLE AMI randomized trial. , 2012, JAMA.

[3]  P. Barragan,et al.  Biological efficacy of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel in ST-elevation myocardial infarction , 2012, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[4]  G. Stone,et al.  Drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents in primary angioplasty: a pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2012, European heart journal.

[6]  L. Räber,et al.  Comparison of biolimus eluted from an erodible stent coating with bare metal stents in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (COMFORTABLE AMI trial): rationale and design. , 2012, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  F. Eberli,et al.  Impact of incomplete stent apposition on long-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation. , 2012, European heart journal.

[8]  F. Eberli,et al.  Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year follow-up of a randomised non-inferiority trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[9]  E. Edelman,et al.  Stent Thrombogenicity Early in High-Risk Interventional Settings Is Driven by Stent Design and Deployment and Protected by Polymer-Drug Coatings , 2011, Circulation.

[10]  B. Gersh,et al.  Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  H. Putter,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 9-month angiographic and intravascular ultrasound results and 12-month clinical outcome results from the MISSION! Intervention Study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  E. Bramucci,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  G. Stone,et al.  Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Bruce R. Brodie,et al.  Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1999 .

[15]  P. Kligfield Primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction. , 1995, British heart journal.

[16]  J O'Keefe,et al.  A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1993 .

[17]  J. Reiber,et al.  A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.