Intrinsic feature extraction using discriminant diffusion mapping analysis for automated tool wear evaluation

We present a method of discriminant diffusion maps analysis (DDMA) for evaluating tool wear during milling processes. As a dimensionality reduction technique, the DDMA method is used to fuse and reduce the original features extracted from both the time and frequency domains, by preserving the diffusion distances within the intrinsic feature space and coupling the features to a discriminant kernel to refine the information from the high-dimensional feature space. The proposed DDMA method consists of three main steps: (1) signal processing and feature extraction; (2) intrinsic dimensionality estimation; (3) feature fusion implementation through feature space mapping with diffusion distance preservation. DDMA has been applied to current signals measured from the spindle in a machine center during a milling experiment to evaluate the tool wear status. Compared with the popular principle component analysis method, DDMA can better preserve the useful intrinsic information related to tool wear status. Thus, two important aspects are highlighted in this study: the benefits of the significantly lower dimension of the intrinsic features that are sensitive to tool wear, and the convenient availability of current signals in most industrial machine centers.

[1]  A. M. M. Sharif Ullah,et al.  Tool-wear prediction and pattern-recognition using artificial neural network and DNA-based computing , 2015, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[2]  Tapani Ristaniemi,et al.  Gear classification and fault detection using a diffusion map framework , 2015, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  Claude Delpha,et al.  Linear discriminant analysis for the discrimination of faults in bearing balls by using spectral features , 2014, 2014 First International Conference on Green Energy ICGE 2014.

[4]  Edward R. Vrscay,et al.  Fractal-Based Methods in Analysis , 2011 .

[5]  Quansheng Jiang,et al.  Machinery fault diagnosis using supervised manifold learning , 2009 .

[6]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Intelligent Diagnosis and Prognosis of Tool Wear Using Dominant Feature Identification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  C. W. de Silva,et al.  Tool wear detection and fault diagnosis based on cutting force monitoring , 2007 .

[8]  Y. S. Tarng,et al.  An automated flank wear measurement of microdrills using machine vision , 2006 .

[9]  Rene de Jesus Romero-Troncoso,et al.  Sensorless tool failure monitoring system for drilling machines , 2006 .

[10]  C. M. O. Valente,et al.  Precision Manufacturing Process Monitoring with Acoustic Emission , 2006 .

[11]  Matthias Hein,et al.  Intrinsic dimensionality estimation of submanifolds in Rd , 2005, ICML.

[12]  B. Nadler,et al.  Diffusion maps, spectral clustering and reaction coordinates of dynamical systems , 2005, math/0503445.

[13]  Won Tae Kwon,et al.  Drilling torque control using spindle motor current and its effect on tool wear , 2004 .

[14]  Francesco Camastra,et al.  Data dimensionality estimation methods: a survey , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Issam Abu-Mahfouz,et al.  Drilling wear detection and classification using vibration signals and artificial neural network , 2003 .

[16]  M. Sortino,et al.  Application of statistical filtering for optical detection of tool wear , 2003 .

[17]  A. Vinciarelli,et al.  Estimating the Intrinsic Dimension of Data with a Fractal-Based Method , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  P. S. Heyns,et al.  WEAR MONITORING IN TURNING OPERATIONS USING VIBRATION AND STRAIN MEASUREMENTS , 2001 .

[19]  K. Goebel,et al.  Feature Selection for Tool Wear Diagnosis Using Soft Computing Techniques , 2000, Manufacturing Engineering.

[20]  D. E. Dimla,et al.  Sensor signals for tool-wear monitoring in metal cutting operations—a review of methods , 2000 .

[21]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  A Fast Fixed-Point Algorithm for Independent Component Analysis of Complex Valued Signals , 2000, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[22]  S. Tso,et al.  Drill wear monitoring based on current signals , 1999 .

[23]  R. Burton,et al.  Consistency of the Takens estimator for the correlation dimension , 1999 .

[24]  Wim Sweldens,et al.  The lifting scheme: a construction of second generation wavelets , 1998 .

[25]  Hong-Tsu Young,et al.  Cutting temperature responses to flank wear , 1996 .

[26]  Roberto Teti,et al.  Online Prediction of Cutting Tool Life in Turning via Cognitive Decision Making , 2016 .

[27]  Roberto Teti,et al.  Tool Wear Control through Cognitive Paradigms , 2015 .

[28]  C. W. Yao,et al.  A diagnosis method of wear and tool life for an endmill by ultrasonic detection , 2014 .

[29]  Jay Lee,et al.  Discriminant diffusion maps analysis: A robust manifold learner for dimensionality reduction and its applications in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis , 2013 .

[30]  Roberto Teti,et al.  Image data processing via neural networks for tool wear prediction , 2013 .

[31]  Stéphane Lafon,et al.  Diffusion maps , 2006 .

[32]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  On the 'Dimensionality Curse' and the 'Self-Similarity Blessing' , 2001, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..