Seed–seedling allometry in tropical rain forest trees: seed mass‐related patterns of resource allocation and the ‘reserve effect’

1 The seedlings of larger seeded species generally perform better than those of smaller seeded species under a variety of hazards. The reserve effect proposes that larger seeded species retain a greater proportion of their initial seed resources and their seedlings are therefore better provisioned to cope with post‐deployment resource deficits. 2 This hypothesis was tested with a suite of 32 Australian rain forest species with storage cotyledons, and seed reserve mass ranging from 36 mg to 25 g. Seedlings germinated in dim light were harvested as their first set of leaves became fully expanded, dissected into shoot, root and left‐over cotyledons, dried and weighed. 3 In cross‐species, allometric analyses, the mean mass of the shoot‐plus‐root scaled less than proportionately (slope c. 0.8), and mean cotyledon mass more than proportionately (slope c. 1.1) with either initial seed mass or seedling mass. These slopes were significantly different from each other. Both conditions for a reserve effect were therefore fulfilled. Cotyledons ranged from 45% of total seedling mass in the smallest species, to 92% in the largest. 4 Solid evidence for a reserve effect was detected within two of four families tested (Lauraceae and Myrtaceae), but only in 7 of the 22 species for which there were sufficient data. 5 Even if the reserve effect has present day utility for enhanced seedling performance in larger seeded species, it may have evolved in response to selection for a greater relative retention of initial seed mass during seedling deployment in larger seeded species, combined with selection for greater deployment of seed reserves to the initial shoot and root of smaller seeded species.

[1]  P. Green,et al.  Seed mass, seedling herbivory and the reserve effect in tropical rainforest seedlings , 2004 .

[2]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Recruitment trade-offs and the evolution of dispersal mechanisms in plants , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.

[3]  K. Kikuzawa,et al.  Importance of seed size for the establishment of seedlings of five deciduous broad-leaved tree species , 1996, Vegetatio.

[4]  H. Mooney,et al.  Seed weight and seed resources in relation to plant growth rate , 1988, Oecologia.

[5]  S. L. Gulmon.  Patterns of seed germination in Californian serpentine grassland species , 2004, Oecologia.

[6]  P. Grubb,et al.  Growth and mortality in high and low light: trends among 15 shade‐tolerant tropical rain forest tree species , 2003 .

[7]  Ds Falster.  (S)MATR : standardised major axis tests and routines. Version 1.0 , 2003 .

[8]  D. Christophel,et al.  Australian tropical rain forest plants : trees, shrubs and vines , 2003 .

[9]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[10]  W. Edwards,et al.  Multiple resprouting from diaspores and single cotyledons in the Australian tropical tree species Idiospermum australiense , 2002, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[11]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Lipid concentration in the embryo–endosperm fraction of seeds of Australian tropical lowland rainforest trees: relevance to defence and dispersal , 2002, Seed Science Research.

[12]  K. Kitajima.  Do shade‐tolerant tropical tree seedlings depend longer on seed reserves? Functional growth analysis of three Bignoniaceae species , 2002 .

[13]  R. Chazdon,et al.  Light gradient partitioning by tropical tree seedlings in the absence of canopy gaps , 2002, Oecologia.

[14]  P. Groom,et al.  Green cotyledons of two Hakea species control seedling mass and morphology by supplying mineral nutrients rather than organic compounds , 2002 .

[15]  I. Ninomiya,et al.  Utilization of seed reserves during germination and early seedling growth by Dryobalanops lanceolata (Dipterocarpaceae) , 2001, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[16]  S. Handel,et al.  Additive and nonadditive effects of herbivory and competition on tree seedling mortality, growth, and allocation. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[17]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed mass and seedling dimensions in relation to seedling establishment , 2000, Oecologia.

[18]  M. Westoby,et al.  A survey of seed and seedling characters in 1744 Australian dicotyledon species: cross-species trait correlations and correlated trait-shifts within evolutionary lineages , 2000 .

[19]  M. Westoby,et al.  The Evolutionary ecology of seed size , 2000 .

[20]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed Mass and the Evolution of Early‐Seedling Etiolation , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[21]  Robin L. Chazdon,et al.  SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY OF LIGHT AND WOODY SEEDLING REGENERATION IN TROPICAL WET FORESTS , 1999 .

[22]  W. Bond,et al.  Seed size and seedling emergence: an allometric relationship and some ecological implications , 1999, Oecologia.

[23]  K. Harms,et al.  Damage tolerance and cotyledonary resource use in the tropical tree Gustavia superba , 1999 .

[24]  Ian J. Wright,et al.  Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients , 1999 .

[25]  A. Mack.  An Advantage of Large Seed Size: Tolerating Rather than Succumbing to Seed Predators 1 , 1998 .

[26]  D. Metcalfe,et al.  Nitrogen-richness and protection of seeds in Australian tropical rainforest: a test of plant defence theory , 1998 .

[27]  D. Burslem,et al.  Mineral nutrient concentrations as a function of seed size within seed crops: implications for competition among seedlings and defence against herbivory , 1998, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[28]  B. Lamont,et al.  Seed/cotyledon size and nutrient content play a major role in early performance of species on nutrient‐poor soils , 1997 .

[29]  S. Gould,et al.  The exaptive excellence of spandrels as a term and prototype. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  D. Coomes,et al.  Seed mass and nutrient content in nutrient-starved tropical rainforest in Venezuela , 1997, Seed Science Research.

[31]  K. Harms,et al.  Seed damage tolerance and seedling resprouting ability of Prioria copaifera in Panamá , 1997, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[32]  K. Harms,et al.  Damage and herbivory tolerance through resprouting as an advantage of large seed size in tropical trees and lianas , 1997, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[33]  D. Metcalfe,et al.  The responses to shade of seedlings of very small‐seeded tree and shrub species from tropical rain forest in Singapore , 1997 .

[34]  M. Westoby,et al.  Larger seeds in tropical floras: consistent patterns independent of growth form and dispersal mode , 1997 .

[35]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size , 1996 .

[36]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1996 .

[37]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal , 1996 .

[38]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling relative growth rate and its components in relation to seed size: phylogenetically independent contrasts , 1996 .

[39]  M. Swaine.  The ecology of tropical forest tree seedlings , 1996 .

[40]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed Size and Phylogeny in Six Temperate Floras: Constraints, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptation , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[41]  M. Westoby,et al.  The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence , 1994 .

[42]  O. O. Osunkoya,et al.  Influence of seed size and seedling ecological attributes on shade-tolerance of rain-forest tree species in northern Queensland , 1994 .

[43]  L. Sonesson.  Growth and survival after cotyledon removal in Quercus robur seedlings, grown in different natural soil types , 1994 .

[44]  Doug P. Armstrong,et al.  Seedlings from Large Seeds Tolerated Defoliation Better: A Test Using Phylogeneticaly Independent Contrasts , 1993 .

[45]  R. Reader.  Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species , 1993 .

[46]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling growth in relation to seed size among species of arid Australia , 1992 .

[48]  J. Molofsky,et al.  The Effect of Leaf Litter on Early Seedling Establishment in a Tropical Forest , 1992 .

[49]  K. Kitajima.  Relationship between photosynthesis and thickness of cotyledons for tropical tree species , 1992 .

[50]  Lawrence R. Walker,et al.  Differential seedling responses to litter after Hurricane Hugo in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico , 1991 .

[51]  R. Peters,et al.  A Test of the Tilman Model of Plant Strategies: Relative Growth Rate and Biomass Partitioning , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[52]  Kamaljit S. Bawa,et al.  Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants , 1990 .

[53]  M. Fenner,et al.  MINERAL NUTRIENT ALLOCATION IN SEEDS AND SHOOTS OF TWELVE CHIONOCHLOA SPECIES IN RELATION TO SOIL FERTILITY , 1989 .

[54]  A. Burt.  Comparative methods using phylogenetically independent contrasts , 1989 .

[55]  M. Fenner.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SEED WEIGHT, ASH CONTENT AND SEEDLING GROWTH IN TWENTY‐FOUR SPECIES OF COMPOSITAE , 1983 .

[56]  S. Gould,et al.  Exaptation—a Missing Term in the Science of Form , 1982, Paleobiology.

[57]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[58]  Christopher C. Smith,et al.  The Optimal Balance between Size and Number of Offspring , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[59]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Seedling Establishment in Vertical Gradients of Sunlight , 1965 .