The Coping Strategies Questionnaire: a large sample, item level factor analysis.

OBJECTIVE The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), a measure of coping in chronic pain patients, was subjected to item-level exploratory factor analysis. SUBJECTS A sample of 965 chronic pain patients were used in the analysis. RESULTS Principal components analysis using a varimax rotation procedure identified nine factors that accounted for 54.5% of the variance. Of these nine factors, the first five represent subscales of the original CSQ subscales. The catastrophizing subscale replicated with significant loadings for all six original items, and ignoring sensations replicated with five of six items. Factors representing reinterpreting pain sensations, coping self-statements, and diverting attention subscales also appeared. The items from the praying and hoping subscale split into separate praying and hoping factors (factors 6 and 8). When reliability coefficients were calculated, factors 7 through 9 had unacceptably low internal consistency and thus were not considered stable factors. Correlations between factors 1 through 6 and other measures of psychological and physical functioning were calculated in the construct validation portion of this study. Previously found relationships were replicated in that the correlations between CSQ factor scores and measures of pain, depression, and disability were in the same direction in this data set as those previously reported.

[1]  J. Turner,et al.  Strategies for coping with chronic low back pain: Relationship to pain and disability , 1986, Pain.

[2]  M. Robinson,et al.  Differences in Cognitive Coping Strategies Among Pain-Sensitive and Pain-Tolerant Individuals on the Cold-Pressor Test , 1991 .

[3]  R. Melzack The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods , 1975, PAIN.

[4]  D. Watson,et al.  Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. , 1991, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  Empirical dimensions of coping in chronic pain patients: A factorial analysis. , 1991 .

[6]  M. Robinson,et al.  The Coping Strategies Questionnaire and Chronic Pain Adjustment: A Conceptual and Empirical Reanalysis , 1994, The Clinical journal of pain.

[7]  M. Robinson,et al.  Relationship of MMPI Cluster Type, Pain Coping Strategy, and Treatment Outcome , 1992, The Clinical journal of pain.

[8]  F. Keefe,et al.  Catastrophizing, depression and the sensory, affective and evaluative aspects of chronic pain , 1994, Pain.

[9]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Arthritis and perceptions of quality of life: an examination of positive and negative affect in rheumatoid arthritis patients. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[10]  Robert G. Frank,et al.  Health locus of control, gender differences and adjustment to persistent pain , 1990, Pain.

[11]  M. Jensen,et al.  The development and preliminary validation of an instrument to assess patients' attitudes toward pain. , 1987, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[12]  M. Jensen,et al.  Coping with chronic pain: a critical review of the literature , 1991, Pain.

[13]  Francis J. Keefe,et al.  The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment , 1983, Pain.

[14]  D. Turk,et al.  The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) , 1985, Pain.

[15]  D. Doleys,et al.  Exercise quotas, anticipatory concern and self-efficacy expectancies in chronic pain: a preliminary report , 1986, Pain.

[16]  J. Beckham,et al.  Pain coping strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: Relationships to pain, disability, depression and daily hassles , 1991 .

[17]  J. Nunley,et al.  Osteoarthritic knee pain: a behavioral analysis , 1987, Pain.

[18]  Fuad G. Gwadry,et al.  The factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire , 1994, Pain.

[19]  M. Jensen,et al.  Correlates of improvement in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.