Contextuality in Neurobehavioural and Collective Intelligence Systems

Contextuality is often described as a unique feature of the quantum realm, which distinguishes it fundamentally from the classical realm. This is not strictly true, and stems from decades of the misapplication of Kolmogorov probability. Contextuality appears in Kolmogorov theory (observed in the inability to form joint distributions) and in non-Kolmogorov theory (observed in the violation of inequalities of correlations). Both forms of contextuality have been observed in psychological experiments, although the first form has been known for decades but mostly ignored. The complex dynamics of neural systems (neurobehavioural regulatory systems) and of collective intelligence systems (social insect colonies) are described. These systems are contextual in the first sense and possibly in the second as well. Process algebra, based on the Process Theory of Whitehead, describes systems that are generated, transient, open, interactive, and primarily information-driven, and seems ideally suited to modeling these systems. It is argued that these dynamical characteristics give rise to contextuality and non-Kolmogorov probability in spite of these being entirely classical systems.

[1]  D. Aerts,et al.  Quantum entanglement in physical and cognitive systems: A conceptual analysis and a general representation , 2019, The European Physical Journal Plus.

[2]  M. Baldo Completing Quantum Mechanics , 2021, 2104.12701.

[3]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Modeling Human Decision-Making: An Overview of the Brussels Quantum Approach , 2018, Foundations of Science.

[4]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Variability in individual assessment behaviour and its implications for collective decision-making , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  William H Sulis Modeling Stochastic Complexity in Complex Adaptive Systems: Non-Kolmogorov Probability and the Process Algebra Approach. , 2017, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[6]  S. Greenfield,et al.  The Features and Functions of Neuronal Assemblies: Possible Dependency on Mechanisms beyond Synaptic Transmission , 2017, Front. Neural Circuits.

[7]  Irina Trofimova PHENOMENA OF FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIATION AND FRACTAL FUNCTIONALITY , 2016 .

[8]  William Sulis Transients as the Basis for Information Flow in Complex Adaptive Systems , 2019, Entropy.

[9]  W. Sulis A Process Algebra Approach to Quantum Electrodynamics , 2017 .

[10]  E. Robinson,et al.  How collective comparisons emerge without individual comparisons of the options , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Daniel N. Barry,et al.  Consolidating the Case for Transient Hippocampal Memory Traces , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  E. Robinson,et al.  Experience-dependent flexibility in collective decision making by house-hunting ants , 2011 .

[14]  E. Vizi,et al.  Non‐synaptic receptors and transporters involved in brain functions and targets of drug treatment , 2010, British journal of pharmacology.

[15]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Computational model of collective nest selection by ants with heterogeneous acceptance thresholds , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[16]  S. Pratt,et al.  Ants learn to rely on more informative attributes during decision-making , 2013, Biology Letters.

[17]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Snow Queen Is Evil and Beautiful: Experimental Evidence for Probabilistic Contextuality in Human Choices , 2017, Decision.

[18]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Contextuality-by-Default: A Brief Overview of Ideas, Concepts, and Terminology , 2015, QI.

[19]  Donald O. Walter,et al.  Mass action in the nervous system , 1975 .

[20]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  Neurodynamics: An Exploration in Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics , 2000, Perspectives in Neural Computing.

[21]  I. Trofimova,et al.  Functional Constructivism: In Search of Formal Descriptors. , 2017, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[22]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[23]  K. Fuxe,et al.  Intercellular communication in the brain: Wiring versus volume transmission , 1995, Neuroscience.

[24]  Deborah M. Gordon The Development of Organization in an Ant Colony , 1995 .

[25]  Manisha Bhatia,et al.  Gut microbiota’s effect on mental health: The gut-brain axis , 2017, Clinics and practice.

[26]  Samuel Ellis,et al.  A Simple Threshold Rule Is Sufficient to Explain Sophisticated Collective Decision-Making , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  RANDOM WALK MODELS FOR THE SPIKE ACTIVITY OF A SINGLE NEURON. , 1964, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Against ‘Realism’ , 2006, quant-ph/0607057.

[29]  William Sulis An Information Ontology for the Process Algebra Model of Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics , 2020, Entropy.

[30]  Thomas Jennewein,et al.  Is wave–particle objectivity compatible with determinism and locality? , 2012, Nature Communications.

[31]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum cognition goes beyond-quantum: modeling the collective participant in psychological measurements , 2018, Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics.

[32]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Context-Content Systems of Random Variables: The Contextuality-by-Default Theory , 2015, 1511.03516.

[33]  R. Muller,et al.  The firing of hippocampal place cells in the dark depends on the rat's recent experience , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  W. Sulis The Continuum Between Temperament and Mental Illness as Dynamical Phases and Transitions , 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry.

[35]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Quantum non-locality based on finite-speed causal influences leads to superluminal signalling , 2011, Nature Physics.

[36]  S. Pratt,et al.  Rationality in collective decision-making by ant colonies , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  M. M�glich,et al.  Tandem Calling: A New Kind of Signal in Ant Communication , 1974, Science.

[38]  Lacey J. Kitch,et al.  Long-term dynamics of CA1 hippocampal place codes , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  A. Gleason Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space , 1957 .

[40]  Laurent Cognet,et al.  Unveiling the Extracellular Space of the Brain: From Super-resolved Microstructure to In Vivo Function , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Non-Kolmogorovian Approach to the Context-Dependent Systems Breaking the Classical Probability Law , 2013 .

[42]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  E. Robinson,et al.  Do ants make direct comparisons? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[45]  Garg,et al.  Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? , 1985, Physical review letters.

[46]  M. Möglich Social organization of nest emigration inLeptothorax (Hym., Form.) , 1978, Insectes Sociaux.

[47]  W. Sulis The Continuum from Temperament to Mental Illness: Dynamical Perspectives , 2020, Neuropsychobiology.

[48]  Mermin Nd Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems. , 1990 .

[49]  Yoshihiro Maruyama Quantum contextuality and cognitive contextuality: The significance of violations of Bell-type inequalities , 2021, Biosyst..

[50]  J. Bell On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[51]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Cognitive Phase Transitions in the Cerebral Cortex - Enhancing the Neuron Doctrine by Modeling Neural Fields , 2015 .

[52]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  Ru Zhang,et al.  Is there contextuality in behavioural and social systems? , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[54]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[55]  Abner Shimony,et al.  Search For A Naturalistic World View , 1993 .

[56]  E. Azmitia Serotonin and brain: evolution, neuroplasticity, and homeostasis. , 2007, International review of neurobiology.

[57]  W. Sulis Assessing the continuum between temperament and affective illness: psychiatric and mathematical perspectives , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  H. Landau Necessary density conditions for sampling and interpolation of certain entire functions , 1967 .

[59]  William Sulis,et al.  Fundamental Concepts of Collective Intelligence , 1997 .

[60]  N. N. Vorob’ev Consistent Families of Measures and Their Extensions , 1962 .

[61]  William Sulis,et al.  Locality Is Dead! Long Live Locality! , 2020, Frontiers in Physics.

[62]  George W. Mackey,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Hilbert Space , 1957 .

[63]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  How ants use quorum sensing to estimate the average quality of a fluctuating resource , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[64]  N. Mermin What’s bad about this habit , 2009 .

[65]  W. Sulis A Process Model of Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1404.3414.

[66]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[67]  Brussels,et al.  Entanglement in Cognition violating Bell Inequalities Beyond Cirel'son's Bound , 2021, 2102.03847.

[68]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  Irina Trofimova,et al.  Sociability, diversity and compatibility in developing systems: EVS approach , 2003 .

[70]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  True contextuality in a psychophysical experiment , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[71]  A mathematical model of ephaptic interactions in neuronal fiber pathways: Could there be more than transmission along the tracts? , 2020, Network Neuroscience.