A method of combining coherence-constrained sparse coding and dictionary learning for denoising

ABSTRACTWe have addressed the seismic data denoising problem, in which the noise is random and has an unknown spatiotemporally varying variance. In seismic data processing, random noise is often attenuated using transform-based methods. The success of these methods in denoising depends on the ability of the transform to efficiently describe the signal features in the data. Fixed transforms (e.g., wavelets, curvelets) do not adapt to the data and might fail to efficiently describe complex morphologies in the seismic data. Alternatively, dictionary learning methods adapt to the local morphology of the data and provide state-of-the-art denoising results. However, conventional denoising by dictionary learning requires a priori information on the noise variance, and it encounters difficulties when applied for denoising seismic data in which the noise variance is varying in space or time. We have developed a coherence-constrained dictionary learning (CDL) method for denoising that does not require any a priori ...

[1]  M. Elad,et al.  $rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Seismic denoising with nonuniformly sampled curvelets , 2006, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[3]  Tadeusz J. Ulrych,et al.  Information-Based Inversion and Processing with Applications , 2011 .

[4]  E. Candès,et al.  Recovering edges in ill-posed inverse problems: optimality of curvelet frames , 2002 .

[5]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing - The Sparse Way, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[6]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  Dictionary learning: What is the right representation for my signal? , 2011 .

[7]  E. Candès,et al.  The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse , 2004, math/0407210.

[8]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Double Sparsity Dictionary for Seismic Noise Attenuation , 2016 .

[9]  Jian-Feng Cai,et al.  Data-driven tight frame construction and image denoising , 2014 .

[10]  Yang Liu,et al.  Seislet transform and seislet frame , 2010 .

[11]  James H. McClellan,et al.  Seismic data denoising through multiscale and sparsity-promoting dictionary learning , 2015 .

[12]  Michael Elad,et al.  Sparse and Redundant Representations - From Theory to Applications in Signal and Image Processing , 2010 .

[13]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Simultaneous dictionary learning and denoising for seismic data , 2014 .

[14]  R. Neelamani,et al.  Coherent and random noise attenuation using the curvelet transform , 2008 .

[15]  Necati Gulunay,et al.  FXDECON and complex wiener prediction filter , 1986 .

[16]  Michael Elad,et al.  Double Sparsity: Learning Sparse Dictionaries for Sparse Signal Approximation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Michael Elad,et al.  Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  E. Candès,et al.  Curvelets: A Surprisingly Effective Nonadaptive Representation for Objects with Edges , 2000 .

[19]  Michael Elad,et al.  Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Stanley Osher,et al.  Monte Carlo data-driven tight frame for seismic data recovery , 2016 .

[21]  Michael Elad,et al.  Efficient Implementation of the K-SVD Algorithm using Batch Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2008 .

[22]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  Bounding the Maximum of Dependent Random Variables , 2013 .

[23]  Charles C. Mosher,et al.  Wavelet transform methods for geophysical applications , 1993, Optics & Photonics.

[24]  Bennett Eisenberg,et al.  Why Is the Sum of Independent Normal Random Variables Normal? , 2008 .

[25]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Seismic data restoration via data-driven tight frame , 2014 .

[26]  Kjersti Engan,et al.  Method of optimal directions for frame design , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[27]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  Dictionary Learning , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[28]  S. M. Doherty,et al.  Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data , 2000 .

[29]  R. Penrose A Generalized inverse for matrices , 1955 .

[30]  A. Bruckstein,et al.  K-SVD : An Algorithm for Designing of Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2005 .

[31]  S. Berman Limit Theorems for the Maximum Term in Stationary Sequences , 1964 .

[32]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Interpolation and denoising of high-dimensional seismic data by learning a tight frame , 2015 .

[33]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[34]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[35]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  OC-seislet: Seislet transform construction with differential offset continuation , 2010 .

[36]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.