On tilt and curvature dependent errors and the calibration of coherence scanning interferometry.

Although coherence scanning interferometry (CSI) is capable of measuring surface topography with sub-nanometre precision, it is well known that the performance of measuring instruments depends strongly on the local tilt and curvature of the sample surface. Based on 3D linear systems theory, however, a recent analysis of fringe generation in CSI provides a method to characterize the performance of surface measuring instruments and offers considerable insight into the origins of these errors. Furthermore, from the measurement of a precision sphere, a process to calibrate and partially correct instruments has been proposed. This paper presents, for the first time, a critical look at the calibration and correction process. Computational techniques are used to investigate the effects of radius error and measurement noise introduced during the calibration process for the measurement of spherical and sinusoidal profiles. Care is taken to illustrate the residual tilt and curvature dependent errors in a manner that will allow users to estimate measurement uncertainty. It is shown that by calibrating the instrument correctly and using appropriate methods to extract phase from the resulting fringes (such as frequency domain analysis), CSI is capable of measuring the topography of surfaces with varying tilt with sub-nanometre accuracy.

[1]  Chi Fai Cheung,et al.  Estimation of measurement uncertainty caused by surface gradient for a white light interferometer. , 2015, Applied optics.

[2]  Jan Niehues,et al.  Lateral resolution and transfer characteristics of vertical scanning white-light interferometers. , 2012, Applied optics.

[3]  Jim Kramer,et al.  Determination of fringe order in white-light interference microscopy. , 2002, Applied optics.

[4]  Peter J. de Groot,et al.  Principles of interference microscopy for the measurement of surface topography , 2015 .

[5]  Kieran G. Larkin,et al.  Efficient nonlinear algorithm for envelope detection in white light interferometry , 1996 .

[6]  J. Coupland,et al.  Determination of the transfer function for optical surface topography measuring instruments—a review , 2013 .

[7]  Feng Gao,et al.  Surface measurement errors using commercial scanning white light interferometers , 2007 .

[8]  Hans Nørgaard Hansen,et al.  Dimensional micro and nano metrology , 2006 .

[9]  C. Giusca,et al.  Errors and uncertainty in the topography gained via frequency-domain analysis , 2015 .

[10]  Richard Leach,et al.  Coherence scanning interferometry: linear theory of surface measurement. , 2013, Applied optics.

[11]  Peter Lehmann,et al.  Vertical scanning white-light interference microscopy on curved microstructures. , 2010, Optics letters.

[12]  Agostino G. Bruzzone,et al.  Advances in engineered surfaces for functional performance , 2008 .

[13]  J. Lobera Loughborough University Institutional Repository Holography , tomography and 3 D microscopy as linear filtering operations , 2018 .

[14]  Richard Leach,et al.  Coherence scanning interferometry: measurement and correction of three-dimensional transfer and point-spread characteristics. , 2014, Applied optics.

[15]  Obtaining the Transfer Function of optical instruments using large calibrated reference objects. , 2015, Optics express.