Electrotactile Feedback with Spatial and Mixed Coding for Object Identification and Closed-loop Control of Grasping Force in Myoelectric Prostheses

Providing high-quality somatosensory feedback from myoelectric prostheses to an upper-limb amputee user is a long-standing challenge. Various approaches have been investigated for tactile feedback, ranging from direct neural stimulation to noninvasive sensory substitution methods. However, only a few of studies evaluated the closed-loop performance, and real-time movement information of active prostheses still could not be transferred in the form of proprioceptive feedback so far. In current study, an integrated closed-loop prosthesis system consisted of two types of sensors, programmable electrical stimulator and multichannel array electrodes was presented. The grasping angle and corresponding grasping force of the single-freedom myoelectric prosthesis were simultaneously coded with spatial and mixed (spatial and intensity of sensation) coding scheme and tested in 15 able-bodied subjects. The experimental results demonstrated that the subjects were able to discriminate 4 types of object sizes, 3 kinds of different softness and 4 levels of grasping forces in relatively high correct identification rates (CIRs) (size: 87.5%, Softness: 94%, grasping force: 73.8%). The study outcomes and specific conclusions provide valuable guidance for the design of closed-loop myoelectric prostheses equipped with electrotactile feedback.

[1]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[2]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Thierry Keller,et al.  Multichannel Electrotactile Feedback With Spatial and Mixed Coding for Closed-Loop Control of Grasping Force in Hand Prostheses , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions , 1992, Current Biology.

[5]  Guohong Chai,et al.  Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  Virtual Grasping: Closed-Loop Force Control Using Electrotactile Feedback , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[7]  Jacqueline S. Hebert,et al.  Novel Targeted Sensory Reinnervation Technique to Restore Functional Hand Sensation After Transhumeral Amputation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Dario Farina,et al.  Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  Developing Non-Somatotopic Phantom Finger Sensation to Comparable Levels of Somatotopic Sensation through User Training With Electrotactile Stimulation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Dudley S. Childress,et al.  Closed-loop control in prosthetic systems: Historical perspective , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Stephen T. Foldes,et al.  Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[12]  M. Zafar,et al.  Effectiveness of supplemental grasp-force feedback in the presence of vision , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.