Prestimulus hemodynamic activity in dorsal attention network is negatively associated with decision confidence in visual perception.

Attention is thought to improve most aspects of perception. However, we recently showed that, somewhat surprisingly, endogenous attention can also lead to low subjective perceptual ratings (Rahnev et al., 2011). Here we investigated the neural basis of this effect and tested whether spontaneous fluctuations of the attentional state can lead to low confidence in one's perceptual decision. We measured prestimulus functional magnetic resonance imaging activity in the dorsal attention network and used that activity as an index of the level of attention involved in a motion direction discrimination task. Extending our previous findings, we showed that low prestimulus activity in the dorsal attention network, which presumably reflected low level of attention, was associated with higher confidence ratings. These results were explained by a signal detection theoretic model in which lack of attention increases the trial-by-trial variability of the internal perceptual response. In line with the model, we also found that low prestimulus activity in the dorsal attention network was associated with higher trial-by-trial variability of poststimulus peak activity in the motion-sensitive region MT+. These findings support the notion that lack of attention may lead to liberal subjective perceptual biases, a phenomenon we call "inattentional inflation of subjective perception."

[1]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[2]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[5]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[6]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Response Variability of Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex (V1) of Alert Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  A Gorea,et al.  Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  F. Bermpohl,et al.  Cortical midline structures and the self , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  M. Carandini Amplification of Trial-to-Trial Response Variability by Neurons in Visual Cortex , 2004, PLoS biology.

[15]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Brain signals for spatial attention predict performance in a motion discrimination task. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Egill Rostrup,et al.  Motion or activity: their role in intra- and inter-subject variation in fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[22]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Differential Attention-Dependent Response Modulation across Cell Classes in Macaque Visual Area V4 , 2007, Neuron.

[23]  Christopher J. Aura,et al.  Divergence of fMRI and neural signals in V1 during perceptual suppression in the awake monkey , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Spontaneous local variations in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Ongoing Activity Fluctuations in hMT+ Bias the Perception of Coherent Visual Motion , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[27]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The contingent negative variation (CNV) event-related potential (ERP) predicts the attentional blink , 2008 .

[28]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise. , 2008, Psychological review.

[30]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[31]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex , 2009, Science.

[32]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Distributed and Antagonistic Contributions of Ongoing Activity Fluctuations to Auditory Stimulus Detection , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Persistent neural activity in the human frontal cortex when maintaining space that is “off the map” , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Fox,et al.  The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Adriana de Pesters,et al.  Psychophysical magic: rendering the "invisible" visible , 2009 .

[38]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Intrinsic Connectivity Networks, Alpha Oscillations, and Tonic Alertness: A Simultaneous Electroencephalography/Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Andrew M. Clark,et al.  Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Relating Introspective Accuracy to Individual Differences in Brain Structure , 2010, Science.

[41]  Michael A. Silver,et al.  Spatial attention improves reliability of fMRI retinotopic mapping signals in occipital and parietal cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[42]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[43]  H. Lau,et al.  Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Jeffrey S Anderson,et al.  Network anticorrelations, global regression, and phase‐shifted soft tissue correction , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[45]  K. Harris,et al.  Cortical state and attention , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  H. Lau,et al.  Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  R. Dolan,et al.  Prefrontal Contributions to Metacognition in Perceptual Decision Making , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.