Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology

Laboratory automation is currently the main organizational challenge for microbiologists. Automating classic workflows is a strenuous process for the laboratory personnel and a huge and long-lasting financial investment. The investments are rewarded through increases in quality and shortened time to report. However, the benefits for an individual laboratory can only be estimated after the implementation and depending on the classic workflows currently performed. The two main components of automation are hardware and workflow. This review focusses on the workflow aspects of automation and describes some of the main developments during recent years. Additionally, it tries to define some terms which are related to automation and specifies some developments which would further improve automated systems.

[1]  Automated versus Manual Sample Inoculations in Routine Clinical Microbiology: a Performance Evaluation of the Fully Automated InoqulA Instrument , 2013, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  G. Greub,et al.  Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? , 2016, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[3]  R. Marcelpoil,et al.  Towards automated detection, semi-quantification and identification of microbial growth in clinical bacteriology: A proof of concept , 2017, Biomedical journal.

[4]  S. Giglio,et al.  Multicenter Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS): Comparison Between Digital Image and Traditional Plate Reading Using Urine Cultures , 2017, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[5]  N. nørskov-lauritsen,et al.  Comparison of growth on mannitol salt agar, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, VITEK® 2 with partial sequencing of 16S rRNA gene for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. , 2017, Microbial pathogenesis.

[6]  José L Moreno-Camacho,et al.  Transformation From a Conventional Clinical Microbiology Laboratory to Full Automation , 2017, Laboratory medicine.

[7]  F. Vandenesch,et al.  Does bacteriology laboratory automation reduce time to results and increase quality management? , 2016, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[8]  L. Dalla-Costa,et al.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight: a promising alternative method of identifying the major coagulase-negative Staphylococci species. , 2018, Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical.

[9]  F. Burckhardt,et al.  Identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae: Development of a Standardized Protocol for Optochin Susceptibility Testing Using Total Lab Automation , 2017, BioMed research international.

[10]  S. Giglio,et al.  Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures , 2015, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  C. Burnham,et al.  Enhanced Recovery of Fastidious Organisms from Urine Culture in the Setting of Total Laboratory Automation , 2018, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  L. Berry,et al.  The promise of Lean in health care. , 2013, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  N. Ledeboer,et al.  Automatic Digital Analysis of Chromogenic Media for Vancomycin-Resistant-Enterococcus Screens Using Copan WASPLab , 2016, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[14]  E. Mylonakis,et al.  The Effect of Molecular Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Clinical Outcomes in Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[15]  E. Böttger,et al.  Fully automated disc diffusion for rapid antibiotic susceptibility test results: a proof-of-principle study , 2017, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[16]  K. Heeg,et al.  Significant increase in cultivation of Gardnerella vaginalis, Alloscardovia omnicolens, Actinotignum schaalii, and Actinomyces spp. in urine samples with total laboratory automation , 2018, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[17]  F. Vandenesch,et al.  An Automated Sample Preparation Instrument to Accelerate Positive Blood Cultures Microbial Identification by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (Vitek®MS) , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[18]  J. Verhaegen,et al.  How small modifications in laboratory workflow of blood cultures can have a significant impact on time to results , 2018, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[19]  Robin Patel,et al.  MALDI-TOF MS for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. , 2015, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  R. Thomson,,et al.  Total Laboratory Automation and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Improve Turnaround Times in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory: a Retrospective Analysis , 2017, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[21]  M. Sevick,et al.  Toyota production system quality improvement initiative improves perioperative antibiotic therapy. , 2009, The American journal of managed care.

[22]  D. Myny,et al.  How much of Toyota's philosophy is embedded in health care at the organisational level? A review , 2018, Journal of nursing management.

[23]  Comparison of Inoculation with the InoqulA and WASP Automated Systems with Manual Inoculation , 2015, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[25]  C. Riedi,et al.  MALDI-TOF: a useful tool for laboratory identification of uncommon glucose non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria associated with cystic fibrosis. , 2014, Journal of medical microbiology.

[26]  S. Zimmermann,et al.  Evaluation of the Impact of Automated Specimen Inoculation, Using Previ Isola, on the Quality of and Technical Time for Stool Cultures , 2014, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[27]  A. Bielli,et al.  Automated Scoring of Chromogenic Media for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Use of WASPLab Image Analysis Software , 2015, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[28]  A. Mencacci,et al.  Laboratory automation reduces time to report of positive blood cultures and improves management of patients with bloodstream infection , 2018, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[29]  Computer Staff,et al.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1992 .

[30]  C. Heather,et al.  Automated direct screening for resistance of Gram-negative blood cultures using the BD Kiestra WorkCell , 2017, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[31]  G. Woods.  Automation in clinical microbiology. , 1992, American journal of clinical pathology.

[32]  A. Bauer,et al.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. , 1966, American journal of clinical pathology.

[33]  Thomas J Persoon,et al.  Improving preanalytic processes using the principles of lean production (Toyota Production System). , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[34]  S. McAllister,et al.  Evaluation of the Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS system for identification of Staphylococcus species. , 2015, Journal of microbiological methods.

[35]  Jennifer L Condel,et al.  Improving Papanicolaou test quality and reducing medical errors by using Toyota production system methods. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  Kenneth P Smith,et al.  Automated Interpretation of Blood Culture Gram Stains by Use of a Deep Convolutional Neural Network , 2017, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[37]  P. Hegge,et al.  Using LEAN Principles to Improve Quality, Patient Safety, and Workflow in Histology and Anatomic Pathology , 2010, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[38]  M. Albert,et al.  Real-time comparative evaluation of bioMerieux VITEK MS versus Bruker Microflex MS, two matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry systems, for identification of clinically significant bacteria , 2014, BMC Microbiology.

[39]  Y. Hansmann,et al.  Implementation of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry in Routine Clinical Laboratories Improves Identification of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Reveals the Pathogenic Role of Staphylococcus lugdunensis , 2015, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[40]  Zoltan Takats,et al.  Characterization and identification of clinically relevant microorganisms using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[41]  C. Giske,et al.  Rapid EUCAST disc diffusion testing of MDR Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: inhibition zones for extended-spectrum cephalosporins can be reliably read after 6 h of incubation , 2016, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.