Unified description and validation of Monte Carlo simulators in PET

Several Monte Carlo simulators are currently available for positron emission tomography (PET). Because each code has been described in a different way, it is difficult to know which one is best suited to a specific application. To help clarify the capabilities and accuracy of different codes dedicated to PET simulations, we propose a uniform description of the code features. This description specifies features pertaining to the models used for simulating the physics of PET and for describing a PET acquisition, to the acceleration strategies and to the technical characteristics of the code implementation. To assess the code accuracy, we suggest validation procedures based on NEMA phantoms involving standard physical parameters and simulation of a complex activity distribution. A test characterizing the statistical properties of detected coincidences is also described. The proposed code description and validation procedures are illustrated by considering the SimSET and PET-EGS codes. These codes differ in many features, including models for randoms and dead time, and source description. Despite these differences, both codes yielded data with properties close to those of real data. Depending on the intended application, one code might be preferred however. Indeed, only PET-EGS allows for accurate modelling of count rates while SimSET is more computationally efficient. The proposed code description and validation procedures might help determine which code is most appropriate for a specific application.

[1]  P B Hoffer,et al.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.

[2]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[3]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Mean and variance of coincidence counting with deadtime , 2002 .

[4]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  M. S. Kaplan,et al.  Preliminary Experience With The Photon History Generator Module Of A Public-domain Simulation System For Emission Tomography , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[6]  I Buvat,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations in SPET and PET. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[7]  Yiping Shao,et al.  Acceleration of SimSET photon history generation , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[8]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Comparative evaluation of photon cross-section libraries for materials of interest in PET Monte Carlo simulations , 2000 .

[9]  D R Haynor,et al.  The use of importance sampling techniques to improve the efficiency of photon tracking in emission tomography simulations. , 1991, Medical physics.

[10]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Analytical versus voxelized phantom representation for Monte Carlo simulation in radiological imaging , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Giovanna Rizzo,et al.  A Monte Carlo model of noise components in 3D PET , 2001 .

[12]  Giovanna Rizzo,et al.  Scatter correction techniques in 3D PET: a Monte Carlo evaluation , 1998 .

[13]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Implementation of an Environment for Monte Carlo Simulation of Fully 3-D Positron Tomography on a High-Performance Parallel Platform , 1998, Parallel Comput..

[14]  D. Newport,et al.  Evaluation of simulation-based scatter correction for 3-D PET cardiac imaging , 1995 .

[15]  Dale L. Bailey,et al.  A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners , 1991, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  J S Karp,et al.  Performance of a whole-body PET scanner using curve-plate NaI(Tl) detectors. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  E. Hoffman,et al.  A Monte Carlo correction for the effect of Compton scattering in 3-D PET brain imaging , 1995 .

[18]  H Zaidi,et al.  Relevance of accurate Monte Carlo modeling in nuclear medical imaging. , 1999, Medical physics.