Relationship between M100 Auditory Evoked Response and Auditory Radiation Microstructure in 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Carriers

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deletion and duplication of chromosome 16p11.2 (BP4–BP5) have been associated with developmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorders, and deletion subjects exhibit a large (20-ms) delay of the auditory evoked cortical response as measured by magnetoencephalography (M100 latency). The purpose of this study was to use a multimodal approach to test whether changes in white matter microstructure are associated with delayed M100 latency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty pediatric deletion carriers, 9 duplication carriers, and 39 control children were studied with both magnetoencephalography and diffusion MR imaging. The M100 latency and auditory system DTI measures were compared between groups and tested for correlation. RESULTS: In controls, white matter diffusivity significantly correlated with the speed of the M100 response. However, the relationship between structure and function appeared uncoupled in 16p11.2 copy number variation carriers. The alterations to auditory system white matter microstructure in the 16p11.2 deletion only partially accounted for the 20-ms M100 delay. Although both duplication and deletion groups exhibit abnormal white matter microstructure, only the deletion group has delayed M100 latency. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that gene dosage impacts factors other than white matter microstructure, which modulate conduction velocity.

[1]  H. von Gersdorff,et al.  Fine-Tuning an Auditory Synapse for Speed and Fidelity: Developmental Changes in Presynaptic Waveform, EPSC Kinetics, and Synaptic Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Elliott,et al.  Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus , 2011, Nature.

[3]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Probing region-specific microstructure of human cortical areas using high angular and spatial resolution diffusion MRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[4]  Roland G. Henry,et al.  Probabilistic streamline q-ball tractography using the residual bootstrap , 2008, NeuroImage.

[5]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Opposing Brain Differences in 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Carriers , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Allison G. Dempsey,et al.  A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders , 2012, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[7]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications , 2009, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

[8]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[9]  Timothy P. L. Roberts,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Computational Network Measurements Derived from the Structural Connectome of the Human Brain , 2013, Brain Connect..

[10]  Luke Bloy,et al.  GABA estimation in the brains of children on the autism spectrum: Measurement precision and regional cortical variation , 2014, NeuroImage.

[11]  Raphael Bernier,et al.  The Cognitive and Behavioral Phenotype of the 16p11.2 Deletion in a Clinically Ascertained Population , 2015, Biological Psychiatry.

[12]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE , 2008, NeuroImage.

[13]  The Simons,et al.  Simons Variation in Individuals Project (Simons VIP): A Genetics-First Approach to Studying Autism Spectrum and Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders , 2012, Neuron.

[14]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Timothy P.L. Roberts,et al.  Developmental correlation of diffusion anisotropy with auditory-evoked response , 2009, Neuroreport.

[16]  Pratik Mukherjee,et al.  Aberrant White Matter Microstructure in Children with 16p11.2 Deletions , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  M. Hurles,et al.  Large, rare chromosomal deletions associated with severe early-onset obesity , 2010, Nature.

[19]  B. Leventhal,et al.  The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: A Standard Measure of Social and Communication Deficits Associated with the Spectrum of Autism , 2000, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[20]  Pratik Mukherjee,et al.  Auditory Evoked M100 Response Latency is Delayed in Children with 16p11.2 Deletion but not 16p11.2 Duplication. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  T P L Roberts,et al.  High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging Probabilistic Tractography of the Auditory Radiation , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[22]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[23]  S. Bain Differential Ability Scales , 1991 .

[24]  Yiping Shen,et al.  Cognitive and Behavioral Characterization of 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome , 2010, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[25]  W. Chung,et al.  Abnormal auditory and language pathways in children with 16p11.2 deletion , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[26]  Timothy P.L. Roberts,et al.  Maturational differences in thalamocortical white matter microstructure and auditory evoked response latencies in autism spectrum disorders , 2013, Brain Research.

[27]  Nagesh Adluru,et al.  Atypical diffusion tensor hemispheric asymmetry in autism , 2010, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[28]  Christian R Marshall,et al.  Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder , 2009, Journal of Medical Genetics.