Means of Communicating Innovations. A Case Study for the Analysis and Assessment of Nanotechnology’s Futuristic Visions

Communications about the future potentials of current innovation processes of nanotechnology are often accompanied by visionary scenarios anticipating future applications of nanotechnological products. The analysis and evaluation of the mediality of such scenarios has for some time been an important research topic of both sociological expectation- and Leitbild-research as well as, more recently, the vision assessment of German technology assessment. However, problems arise in these research traditions when they analyze and evaluate the mediality of highlyfuturistic visions whose speculative contents correspond neither to current trends in nanotechnological research and product development nor clearly to strategies and interests of the actors of innovation processes. Based on a case study on the mediality of visionary images of nanomachines used in medical journals, popular science magazines, business press and daily and weekly newspapers, my article shows that highly-futuristic scenarios can by all means be analyzed and evaluated as means of communication which facilitate communication between scientific, economic and mass medial discourses about future potentials of nanotechnology. The use of these futuristic and visionary scenarios for communicating nanotechnology’s futures influences discourse-specific assessments of the innovative potentials of current nanotechnological product developments. To enable an analysis and evaluation of the mediality of highly-speculative visions which are not directly related to practical affairs, my article extends the theoretical and methodological instrument of the current vision assessment program. I suggest a systems-theoretical reorientation of vision assessment which is currently dominated by actor theoretical models.

[1]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Beschreibung der Zukunft , 1992 .

[2]  Armin Grunwald,et al.  Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society , 2000 .

[3]  Arne Hessenbruch,et al.  Nanotechnology and the Negotiation of Novelty , 2004 .

[4]  Joy Bill,et al.  Why the future doesn’t need us , 2003 .

[5]  J. Schummer “Societal and Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology”: Meanings, Interest Groups, and Social Dynamics , 2004 .

[6]  S. Wyatt,et al.  Talking about the future: Metaphors of the Internet , 2000 .

[7]  Colin Milburn,et al.  Nanotechnology in the Age of Posthuman Engineering: Science Fiction as Science , 2003 .

[8]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Ökologie des Nichtwissens , 1992 .

[9]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Nanotechnology: Generalizations in an Interdisciplinary Field of Science and Technology , 2004 .

[10]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[11]  Alfred Nordmann,et al.  Nanotechnology's worldview: new space for old cosmologies , 2004, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[12]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Metaphors and Diaphors in Science Communication , 2005 .

[13]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[14]  Hope Against Hype - Accountability in Biopasts, Presents and Futures , 2003 .

[15]  Peter Mambrey,et al.  Technology Assessment as Metaphor Assessment. Visions Guiding the Development of Information and Communications Technologies , 2000 .

[16]  M. Foucault,et al.  The archaeology of knowledge ; and, The discourse on language , 1972 .

[17]  A. Jordan Nanotechnologie – ein neues Konzept für Diagnostik und Therapie maligner Tumoren , 2001, Der Onkologe.

[18]  Klaus Jopp,et al.  Nanotechnologie — Aufbruch ins Reich der Zwerge , 2003 .

[19]  N. Luhmann,et al.  The Reality of the Mass Media , 2000 .

[20]  Mike Michael,et al.  Prepublication Copy of , 2009 .

[21]  Andreas Lösch Nanomedicine and Space: Discursive Orders of Mediating Innovations , 2004 .

[22]  P. Weingart,et al.  Metaphors and the dynamics of knowledge , 2002 .

[23]  N. Brown,et al.  Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science , 2000 .

[24]  Andreas Lösch,et al.  Anticipating the futures of nanotechnology: Visionary images as means of communication , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[25]  Massimiano Bucchi,et al.  Can genetics help us rethink communication? Public communication of science as a ‘double helix’ , 2004 .