Public Service Motivation in an International Comparative Perspective: The UK and Germany

Public service motivation refers to the type of motivation to perform behavior that relates typically to the public sector; such as altruism or public interest. The concept was originally developed within an American context by James Perry and other academics. However; one can distinguish a similar, if not identical, concept in several European countries. This article makes a comparison between two European cases of public service motivation: the United Kingdom and Germany. The results show that although there are similarities between them, there are also marked differences. Our findings provide the basis for further research to explore the phenomenon in a cross cultural and international context.

[1]  K. König On the Typology of Public Administration , 2003 .

[2]  John K. Crum,et al.  Working for America , 1999 .

[3]  P. Barberis The civil service in an era of change , 1997 .

[4]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  PETTY BUREAUCRACY AND WOOLLYMINDED LIBERALISM? THE CHANGING ETHOS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICERS , 1996 .

[5]  H. Derlien,et al.  German Public Administration : Weberian Despite " Modernization " , 2001 .

[6]  P. Norris Work values, experience, and job satisfaction among government workers , 2002 .

[7]  Jutta Heckhausen,et al.  Motivation and action , 1991 .

[8]  B. Peters Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism , 1999 .

[9]  David J. Houston,et al.  Public-Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test , 2000 .

[10]  Richard D. White Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium , 2001 .

[11]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  The spirit of public administration , 1996 .

[12]  J. Perry Bringing Society In: Toward a Theory of Public-Service Motivation , 2000 .

[13]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation , 2000 .

[14]  Nevil Johnson CHANGE IN THE CIVIL SERVICE: RETROSPECT AND PROSPECTS , 1985 .

[15]  James L. Perry,et al.  Antecedents of Public Service Motivation , 1997 .

[16]  H. Rainey,et al.  Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations , 1999 .

[17]  Gregory B. Lewis,et al.  Public Service Motivation and Job Performance , 2001 .

[18]  Christoph Knill Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies , 1999, Journal of Public Policy.

[19]  C. Hood,et al.  From old public administration to new public management , 1994 .

[20]  H. Wollmann,et al.  Comparing Public Sector Reform in Britain and Germany , 2000 .

[21]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Motivational Bases of Public Service , 1990 .

[22]  R. Yin The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers , 1981 .

[23]  Mark Bevir,et al.  Interpreting British Governance , 2003 .

[24]  James L. Perry,et al.  Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity , 1996 .

[25]  J. Greenaway HAVING THE BUN AND THE HALFPENNY: CAN OLD PUBLIC SERVICE ETHICS SURVIVE IN THE NEW WHITEHALL? , 1995 .

[26]  H. Derlien Historical Legacy and Recent Developments in the German Higher Civil Service , 1991 .

[27]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic , 1998 .

[28]  Gregory B. Lewis,et al.  Who Wants to Work for the Government , 2002 .

[29]  J. Bogumil Die politische Führung öffentlicher Dienste — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Reorganisation , 2003 .

[30]  Rita Mae Kelly,et al.  An Inclusive Democratic Polity, Representative Bureaucracies, and the New Public Management , 1998 .

[31]  A Gullard,et al.  To the House of Lords. , 1998, Nursing times.

[32]  R. Mayntz,et al.  Party Patronage and Politicization of the West German Administrative Elite 1970–1987 ‐ Toward Hybridization? , 1989 .