Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common occupational and environmental health issue. In common with other forms of allergy the disease progresses in two stages; an initial phase during which sensitization is acquired, followed later (after subsequent exposure to the same chemical allergen) by elicitation of a cutaneous inflammatory reaction. The development of skin sensitization is associated with, and requires, the activation and clonal expansion of allergen responsive T lymphocytes and it is these cells that orchestrate the cutaneous allergic reaction. In recent years, much has been learned of the characteristics of immune responses to skin sensitizing chemicals and of the roles played by dendritic cells, cytokines and chemokines. Some of the more interesting cellular and molecular mechanisms are reviewed briefly in this article. A more detailed appreciation of responses induced by chemical allergens has in turn facilitated the design of novel approaches to the toxicological evaluation of skin sensitization. Real progress has been made, not only in the development of improved methods for hazard identification and characterization, but also in the application of new paradigms for risk assessment. The newer methods now available and the opportunities that exist for further advances are considered. Finally, progress has been made in the characterization of skin sensitization in humans and in the clinical management of ACD. This article seeks to consider skin sensitization and ACD in holistic fashion, bridging experimental observations with clinical disease and basic mechanisms with practical toxicology.

[1]  S. Shuster,et al.  Quantitative relationships between sensitizing dose of DNCB and reactivity in normal subjects. , 1983, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[2]  I. Kimber,et al.  Langerhans cell migration , 2000, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[3]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Contact sensitization: A new approach to risk assessment , 1997 .

[4]  P. Cruz,et al.  Contact sensitization induces proliferation of heterogeneous populations of hapten‐specific T cells 1 , 1994, Experimental dermatology.

[5]  D. Kemeny,et al.  Contribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets to the cytokine secretion patterns induced in mice during sensitization to contact and respiratory chemical allergens , 1996, Immunology.

[6]  D. Basketter,et al.  Influence of sodium lauryl sulphate on 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced lymph node activation. , 1993, Toxicology.

[7]  C. Akdis,et al.  T cell-mediated Fas-induced keratinocyte apoptosis plays a key pathogenetic role in eczematous dermatitis. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  A. Dillarstone Cosmetic preservatives , 1997, Contact dermatitis.

[9]  J. Fowler,et al.  Fisher's Contact Dermatitis , 1995 .

[10]  I. Kimber,et al.  Cell and molecular biology of chemical allergy , 1997, Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology.

[11]  I Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[12]  Kimber,et al.  Comparison of cytokine secretion profiles provoked in mice by glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde , 1999, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[13]  D. Basketter,et al.  Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde. , 1998, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[14]  I. Kimber,et al.  Langerhans cells require signals from both tumour necrosis factor‐α and interleukin‐1β for migration , 1997, Immunology.

[15]  D. Basketter,et al.  Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[16]  I Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitization risk assessment: a comparative evaluation of 3 isothiazolinone biocides , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[17]  D. Basketter,et al.  Characterization of chemical allergens as a function of divergent cytokine secretion profiles induced in mice. , 1996, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[18]  P. Friedmann,et al.  The influence of area of application on sensitization by dinitrochlorobenzene , 1990, The British journal of dermatology.

[19]  I. Kimber,et al.  Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  S. Gad,et al.  Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST). , 1986, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  S. Shuster,et al.  Quantitation of sensitization and responsiveness to dinitrochlorobenzene in normal subjects. , 1983, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  I. Kimber,et al.  REVIEWCytokines and chemokines in the initiation and regulation of epidermal Langerhans cell mobilization , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[23]  R. Fairchild,et al.  Development of effector CD8+ T cells in contact hypersensitivity occurs independently of CD4+ T cells. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[24]  R. Tigelaar,et al.  Roles of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in murine contact sensitivity revealed by in vivo monoclonal antibody depletion. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[25]  D. Basketter,et al.  Toxicology of Contact Dermatitis: Allergy, Irritancy and Urticaria , 1999 .

[26]  P. Friedmann,et al.  The effect of altering area of application and dose per unit area on sensitization by DNCB , 1986, The British journal of dermatology.

[27]  P. Frosch,et al.  Textbook of Contact Dermatitis , 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[28]  D. Basketter REVIEW Skin sensitization: risk assessment , 1998, International journal of cosmetic science.

[29]  G F Gerberick,et al.  The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[30]  I. Kimber,et al.  Langerhans cells and chemical allergy. , 1998, Current opinion in immunology.

[31]  E. Padovan,et al.  T cell immune responses to haptens. Structural models for allergic and autoimmune reactions. , 1996, Toxicology.

[32]  D. Basketter,et al.  Classification of Chemical Allergens According to Cytokine Secretion Profiles of Murine Lymph Node Cells , 1997, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[33]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. , 1994, Toxicology.

[34]  M. Hahne,et al.  Cytotoxicity Is Mandatory for CD8+ T Cell–mediated Contact Hypersensitivity , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[35]  S. Romagnani Human TH1 and TH2 subsets: doubt no more. , 1991, Immunology today.

[36]  R. Coffman,et al.  Heterogeneity of cytokine secretion patterns and functions of helper T cells. , 1989, Advances in immunology.

[37]  D. Mason,et al.  Molecular cloning of rat interleukin 4 cDNA and analysis of the cytokine repertoire of subsets of CD4+ T cells , 1991, European journal of immunology.

[38]  R. Fairchild,et al.  T cell populations primed by hapten sensitization in contact sensitivity are distinguished by polarized patterns of cytokine production: interferon gamma-producing (Tc1) effector CD8+ T cells and interleukin (Il) 4/Il-10-producing (Th2) negative regulatory CD4+ T cells , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[39]  C. Albanesi,et al.  Disparate Cytotoxic Activity of Nickel-Specific CD8+ and CD4+ T Cell Subsets Against Keratinocytes1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[40]  M. Croft,et al.  Generation of polarized antigen-specific CD8 effector populations: reciprocal action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-12 in promoting type 2 versus type 1 cytokine profiles , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[41]  D. Basketter,et al.  Irritant thresholds in subjects withcolophony allergy , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[42]  J. Revillard,et al.  Major histocompatibility complex class I‐restricted CD8+ T cells and class II‐restricted CD4+ T cells, respectively, mediate and regulate contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene , 1995, European journal of immunology.

[43]  I Kimber,et al.  Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes. , 2000, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[44]  P. Matzinger Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. , 1994, Annual review of immunology.

[45]  G. Girolomoni,et al.  Patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel and nonallergic individuals display different nickel-specific T cell responses. Evidence for the presence of effector CD8+ and regulatory CD4+ T cells. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[46]  H. Maibach,et al.  Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[47]  I Kimber,et al.  Investigation of lymph node cell proliferation as a possible immunological correlate of contact sensitizing potential. , 1991, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[48]  D. Basketter,et al.  Differential cytokine production following chronic exposure of mice to chemical respiratory and contact allergens. , 1995, Immunology.

[49]  T. Mak,et al.  CD4+ Th1 and CD8+ Type 1 Cytotoxic T Cells Both Play a Crucial Role in the Full Development of Contact Hypersensitivity1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[50]  I Kimber,et al.  A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[51]  I. Kimber,et al.  Role of CD4+ T helper 2‐type cells in cutaneous inflammatory responses induced by fluorescein isothiocyanate , 2000, Immunology.

[52]  P. Amerio,et al.  Enhanced epidermal Langerhans cell migration in IL-10 knockout mice. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[53]  J. Simon,et al.  Peptide immunization indicates that CD8+ T cells are the dominant effector cells in trinitrophenyl-specific contact hypersensitivity. , 2000, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[54]  A. Kligman The identification of contact allergens by human assay. II. Factors influencing the induction and measurement of allergic contact dermatitis. , 1966, The Journal of investigative dermatology.