Quantifying the uncertainty of eddy covariance fluxes due to the use ofdifferent software packages and combinations of processing steps in twocontrasting ecosystems

Abstract. We have carried out an inter-comparison between EddyUH and EddyPro®, two public software packages for post-field processing of eddy covariance data. Datasets including carbon dioxide, methane and water vapour fluxes measured over 2 months at a wetland in southern Finland and carbon dioxide and water vapour fluxes measured over 3 months at an urban site in Helsinki were processed and analysed. The purpose was to estimate the flux uncertainty due to the use of different software packages and to evaluate the most critical processing steps, determining the largest deviations in the calculated fluxes. Turbulent fluxes calculated with a reference combination of processing steps were in good agreement, the systematic difference between the two software packages being up to 2.0 and 6.7 % for half-hour and cumulative sum values, respectively. The raw data preparation and processing steps were consistent between the software packages, and most of the deviations in the estimated fluxes were due to the flux corrections. Among the different calculation procedures analysed, the spectral correction had the biggest impact for closed-path latent heat fluxes, reaching a nocturnal median value of 15 % at the wetland site. We found up to a 43 % median value of deviation (with respect to the run with all corrections included) if the closed-path carbon dioxide flux is calculated without the dilution correction, while the methane fluxes were up to 10 % lower without both dilution and spectroscopic corrections. The Webb–Pearman–Leuning (WPL) and spectroscopic corrections were the most critical steps for open-path systems. However, we found also large spectral correction factors for the open-path methane fluxes, due to the sensor separation effect.

[1]  B. Law,et al.  Handbook of Micrometeorology , 2005 .

[2]  Timo Vesala,et al.  Intra-City Variation in Urban Morphology and Turbulence Structure in Helsinki, Finland , 2013, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[3]  T. Vesala,et al.  Revised eddy covariance flux calculation methodologies – effect on urban energy balance , 2012 .

[4]  Frans T. M. Nieuwstadt,et al.  Temperature measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture fluxes , 1983 .

[5]  R. Kormann,et al.  An Analytical Footprint Model For Non-Neutral Stratification , 2001 .

[6]  William J. Massman,et al.  Handbook of micrometeorology : a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis , 2004 .

[7]  W. Oechel,et al.  A new low-power, open-path instrument for measuring methane flux by eddy covariance , 2011 .

[8]  N. Shurpali,et al.  Intercomparison of fast response commercial gas analysers for nitrous oxide flux measurements under field conditions , 2015 .

[9]  C. J. Moore.  Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems , 1986 .

[10]  S. Larsen,et al.  On the use of the Webb–Pearman–Leuning theory for closed-path eddy correlation measurements , 2007 .

[11]  P. L. Finkelstein,et al.  Sampling error in eddy correlation flux measurements , 2001 .

[12]  Thomas Foken,et al.  The energy balance experiment EBEX-2000. Part II: Intercomparison of eddy-covariance sensors and post-field data processing methods , 2007 .

[13]  I. Mammarella,et al.  Evaluating the performance of commonly used gas analysers for methane eddy covariance flux measurements: the InGOS inter-comparison field experiment , 2014 .

[14]  R. Clement.  Mass and energy exchange of a plantation forest in Scotland using micrometeorological methods , 2004 .

[15]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Carbon dioxide and energy fluxes over a small boreal lake in Southern Finland , 2015 .

[16]  A. Ibrom,et al.  Relative humidity effects on water vapour fluxes measured with closed-path eddy-covariance systems with short sampling lines , 2012 .

[17]  Thomas Foken,et al.  Quality control of CarboEurope flux data – Part 2: Inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software , 2007 .

[18]  A. Grelle,et al.  Addressing the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements of CO2 flux from open‐path gas analyzers , 2008 .

[19]  R. Zulueta,et al.  Optimization of an enclosed gas analyzer sampling system for measuring eddy covariance fluxes of H 2 O and CO 2 , 2016 .

[20]  A. Ibrom,et al.  Attenuation of concentration fluctuations of water vapor and other trace gases in turbulent tube flow , 2008 .

[21]  Corinna Rebmann,et al.  Data Acquisition and Flux Calculations , 2012 .

[22]  Arnold F. Moene,et al.  The principles of surface flux physics: theory, practice and description of the ECPACK library , 2004 .

[23]  Üllar Rannik,et al.  On the damping of temperature fluctuations in a circular tube relevant to the eddy covariance measurement technique , 1997 .

[24]  A. Verhoef,et al.  A system to measure surface fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, water vapour and carbon dioxide , 1997 .

[25]  J. Wilczak,et al.  Sonic Anemometer Tilt Correction Algorithms , 2001 .

[26]  I. Mammarella,et al.  Sorption-Caused Attenuation and Delay of Water Vapor Signals in Eddy-Covariance Sampling Tubes and Filters , 2014 .

[27]  M. Mauder,et al.  Towards a consistent eddy-covariance processing , 2014 .

[28]  Üllar Rannik,et al.  Autoregressive filtering versus linear detrending in estimation of fluxes by the eddy covariance method , 1999 .

[29]  Thomas Foken,et al.  Post-Field Data Quality Control , 2004 .

[30]  E. K. Webb,et al.  Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer , 1980 .

[31]  T. Foken,et al.  Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements , 1996 .

[32]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data , 2000 .

[33]  Thomas Foken,et al.  Impact of post-field data processing on eddy covariance flux estimates and energy balance closure , 2006 .

[34]  Dean Vickers,et al.  Quality Control and Flux Sampling Problems for Tower and Aircraft Data , 1997 .

[35]  Thomas Foken,et al.  New Equations For Sonic Temperature Variance And Buoyancy Heat Flux With An Omnidirectional Sonic Anemometer , 2001 .

[36]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Strong low-pass filtering effects on water vapour flux measurements with closed-path eddy correlation systems , 2007 .

[37]  J. Kaimal,et al.  Spectral Characteristics of Surface-Layer Turbulence , 1972 .

[38]  A. Miyata,et al.  Cross-Validation of Open-Path and Closed-Path Eddy-Covariance Techniques for Observing Methane Fluxes , 2014, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[39]  F. E. Anderson,et al.  Comparing laser-based open- and closed-path gas analyzers to measure methane fluxes using the eddy covariance method , 2011 .

[40]  T. W. Horst,et al.  Attenuation of Scalar Fluxes Measured with Spatially-displaced Sensors , 2009 .

[41]  I. Mammarella,et al.  Field intercomparison of four methane gas analyzers suitable for eddy covariance flux measurements , 2012 .

[42]  Dario Papale,et al.  Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis , 2012 .

[43]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology , 2000 .

[44]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  A case study of eddy covariance flux of N 2 O measured within forest ecosystems: quality control and flux error analysis , 2009 .

[45]  George Burba,et al.  Comparison of net CO 2 fl uxes measured with open-and closed-path infrared gas analyzers in an urban complex environment , 2009 .

[46]  T. W. Horst,et al.  A SIMPLE FORMULA FOR ATTENUATION OF EDDY FLUXES MEASURED WITH FIRST-ORDER-RESPONSE SCALAR SENSORS , 1997 .

[47]  Ray Leuning,et al.  The relative merits of open‐ and closed‐path analysers for measurement of eddy fluxes , 1996 .

[48]  Üllar Rannik,et al.  Relative Humidity Effect on the High-Frequency Attenuation of Water Vapor Flux Measured by a Closed-Path Eddy Covariance System , 2009 .

[49]  M. Aubinet,et al.  Dimensioning IRGA gas sampling systems: laboratory and field experiments , 2016 .