An integrated approach for the consideration of uncertainty in decision making supported by Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract This paper presents an approach for the integrated consideration of both technical and valuation uncertainties during decision making supported by environmental performance information based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Key elements of this approach include “distinguishability analysis” to determine whether the uncertainty in the performance information is likely to make it impossible to distinguish between the activities under consideration, and the use of a multivariate statistical analysis approach, called principal components analysis (PCA), which facilitates the rapid analysis of large numbers of parallel sets of results, and enables the identification of choices that lead to similar and/or opposite evaluations of activities. The integrated approach for the management of uncertainty is demonstrated for a technology selection decision for the recommissioning of a coal-based power station. The results of the case study decision suggest that stakeholder involvement in preference modelling is important, and that the “encoding” of value judgements and preferences into LCA environmental performance information is to be avoided. The approach presented in this paper provides a foundation for the consideration of the implications of diversity in values and preferences as part of an overall approach to promote effective decision making based on LCA environmental performance information. However, the approach is more universally applicable – it can be used wherever multiple criteria decision analysis is used to assist in the resolution of complex decision situations.

[1]  Jyri Seppälä,et al.  Decision analysis as a tool for life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[2]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Modelling the valuesphere and the ecosphere: Integrating the decision makers’ perspectives into LCA , 2000 .

[3]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[4]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment sophistication , 1999 .

[5]  M. Meier Eco-efficiency evaluation of waste gas purification systems in the chemical industry , 1997 .

[6]  E. Hertwich,et al.  A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysis , 2001 .

[7]  James G. Petrie,et al.  A life cycle impact assessment indicator for ash management in coal-based power generation , 2002 .

[8]  Jim Petrie,et al.  Process synthesis and optimisation tools for environmental design: methodology and structure , 2000 .

[9]  J. Petrie,et al.  The environmental impact of ash management in coal-based power generation , 2002 .

[10]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits , 2000 .

[11]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[12]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Environmental System Analysis: The Application of Linear Programming to Life Cycle Assessment Volume 1 , 1996 .

[13]  Jyri Seppälä,et al.  Decision Analysis Frameworks for Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment , 2001 .

[14]  B. Everitt,et al.  Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. , 1993 .

[15]  Lauren Basson Context compensation and uncertainty in environmental decision making , 2004 .

[16]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[17]  Pauli Miettinen,et al.  How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) , 1997 .

[18]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Multicriteria Decision-Aid , 1992 .

[19]  Yvonne Hansen,et al.  Impact assessment of solid wastes from primary industries : an integrated approach , 2004 .

[20]  J. E. Jackson A User's Guide to Principal Components , 1991 .

[21]  Jean-Francois Le Téno,et al.  Visual data analysis and decision support methods for non-deterministic LCA , 1999 .