Should I Stay or Should I Go? Worker Commitment to Virtual Organizations

As society enters the twenty-first century there is a growing realization that information technology (IT) is heavily influencing organizational structures [1]. One such structure is the virtual organization, in which individuals rely on IT to mediate traditional geographical and temporal boundaries of the firm. The result is a "company without walls" that operates as a virtual "collaborative network of people," independent of location or affiliation [2]. This paper is concerned with exploring how this IT-enabled shift influences worker commitment, a critical factor identified in the organizational behavior literature. Using Wenger’s practice-based learning perspective and theory of legitimate peripheral participation (LPP), we conducted a longitudinal, qualitative analysis of commitment in one open-source software (OSS) project. Results indicate that commitment was strongly associated with engagement in LPP processes (participation, learning and identity transformation). Theoretical contributions and managerial implications are discussed.

[1]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Development Success in Open Source Software Projects: Exploring the Impact of Copylefted Licenses , 2005, AMCIS.

[2]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel , 2000, First Monday.

[4]  H. Tsoukas.  The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[6]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[7]  Yutaka Yamauchi,et al.  Collaboration with Lean Media: how open-source software succeeds , 2000, CSCW '00.

[8]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[12]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Kouichi Kishida,et al.  Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[14]  J. F. Byrnes,et al.  Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations , 1984 .

[15]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[16]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance & the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2005 .

[17]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Roderick D. Iverson,et al.  A Causal Model of Behavioral Commitment: Evidence From a Study of Australian Blue-collar Employees , 1994 .

[19]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[20]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[21]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[22]  James D. McKeen,et al.  The Evolution of IS Job Skills: A Content Analysis of IS Job Advertisements from 1970 to 1990 , 1995, MIS Q..

[23]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Defining Open Source Software Project Success , 2003, ICIS.

[24]  E. Hippel.  Innovation by User Communities: Learning From Open-Source Software , 2001 .

[25]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[26]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[27]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Exploring Differences in Employee Turnover Intentions and Its Determinants Among Telecommuters and Non-Telecommuters , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[29]  Mark E. Tubbs.  Commitment and the role of ability in motivation: Comment on Wright, O'Leary-Kelly, Cortina, Klein, and Hollenbeck (1994). , 1994 .

[30]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[31]  John L. Cotton,et al.  Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research , 1986 .

[32]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Computer Communication and Organizational Commitment: Tracing the Relationship in a City Government , 1989 .

[33]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  An Investigation of Information Technology-Enabled Remote Management and Remote Work Issues , 1997, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[35]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[36]  L. Kirsch.  The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .