The impact of information and communication technologies on the costs of democracy

Recent developments in information and communication technologies (ICTs) can change the way strategic organizational decisions are negotiated and voted upon. We propose an analytical framework that investigates the effect of such technologies on the costs of the decision-making process in organizations by incorporating a technology variable in an already well-known model of public decision-making. The framework is applicable to any large group decision setting where collective decisions are made by voting, such as shareholders' meetings, local and federal government meetings. We apply the framework to derive policies that will help to decrease the costs related to the democratic process. The first policy requires that governments should invest more in technologies that support multi-lateral communication and negotiation among citizens, and the second requires that citizens should use better voting mechanisms than simple majority voting to make decisions.

[1]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[2]  G. Tullock,et al.  The calculus of consent : logical foundations of constitutional democracy , 1962 .

[3]  João Paulo Costa,et al.  Incorporating citizens' views in local policy decision making processes , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  V. Smith The Principle of Unanimity and Voluntary Consent in Social Choice , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  D. Mueller Public Choice III: What have we learned? , 1979 .

[6]  Qian Peng,et al.  Strategic alliances in e-government procurement , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[7]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Digital government information services: the Bureau of Labor statistics case , 2003, INTR.

[8]  Bruce Bimber Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power , 2003 .

[9]  Alistair S. Duff,et al.  Social Engineering in the Information Age , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[10]  Janice M. Burn,et al.  Moving towards e‐government: a case study of organisational change processes , 2003 .

[11]  Roumen Vragov,et al.  Electronic Markets for the Allocation, Financing and Distribution of Public Goods , 2006, Electron. Mark..

[12]  Simon French,et al.  Web-enabled strategic GDSS, e-democracy and Arrow's theorem: A Bayesian perspective , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Civil Society and Cyber Society: The Role of the Internet in Community Associations and Democratic Politics , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[14]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  An Experimental Market for Public Goods: The PBS Station Program cooperative , 1976 .

[15]  R. Mark Isaac,et al.  Experiments With the Pivot Process for Providing Public Goods , 2000 .

[16]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[17]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  A Research Framework for Citizen Participation via eConsultation , 2005, AMCIS.

[18]  Calvin Meng Lai Chan,et al.  User engagement in e-government systems implementation: A comparative case study of two Singaporean e-government initiatives , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[20]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  From Information Retrieval to Information Interaction , 2004, ECIR.

[21]  T. Groves,et al.  Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the 'Free Rider Problem' , 1977 .

[22]  Fareed Zakaria,et al.  The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad , 2003 .

[23]  B. Barber Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[24]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  Internet and American Democracy , 2002 .

[25]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government adoption: architecture and barriers , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[26]  J. M. Buchanan,et al.  The Demand and Supply of Public Goods , 1968 .

[27]  Atul Gupta,et al.  Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  H. Varian A Solution to the Problem of Externalities When Agents Are Well-Informed , 1994 .

[29]  Ian Shapiro,et al.  The State of Democratic Theory , 2003 .