Shift in Activity and the Concept of Persisting Tendency

Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on shift in activity and the concept of persisting tendency. Analysis of shift in activity is an important part of the development of behavior theory. Knowledge of the processes that take place in the interval between the onset of a stimulus and the occurrence of an activity is fundamental to an understanding of shift in activity. Shift in activity can be analyzed by the discrete random process and the continuous deterministic process models. At a molar level, there seem to be sharp differences between stimulus-bound theories in which stimuli are viewed as the “causes” of responses and tendency theory in which stimuli effect changes in the strength of tendencies, but tendencies are responsible for the existence of activities. The immediate cause of an event must be active at the time the event begins to occur. But at the time a habit action is evoked, the reinforcing event may be long past, that is, it may no longer exist; and something which does not exist can scarcely be the cause of anything. Thus, the immediate cause of habit-mediated action evocation must be a combination of: (1) the stimulus event; and (2) a relatively permanent condition or organization left by the reinforcement within the nervous system of the animal.

[1]  K. Spence The relation of response latency and speed to the intervening variables and N in S-R theory. , 1954, Psychological review.

[2]  Verbal control of nonverbal behavior , 1966 .

[3]  J. Allison STRENGTH OF PREFERENCE FOR FOOD, MAGNITUDE OF FOOD REWARD, AND PERFORMANCE IN INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[5]  E. Burnstein,et al.  Response strength as a function of hours of food deprivation under a controlled maintenance schedule. , 1958, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  E. Tolman Prediction of vicarious trial and error by means of the schematic sowbug. , 1939 .

[7]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Complexity, novelty, and food deprivation as determinants of speed of shift of behavior. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  J. Brown,et al.  Performance as a function of deprivation time following periodic feeding in an isolated environment. , 1963 .

[9]  C. L. Hull Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena. , 1931 .

[10]  G. Jensen Preference for bar pressing over "freeloading" as a function of number of rewarded presses. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  A. Amsel,et al.  Magnitude of Frustration Effect and Strength of Antedating Goal Factors , 1961 .

[12]  J. Cotton Running time as a function of amount of food deprivation. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Edward A. Bilodeau,et al.  Acquisition of Skill , 1967 .

[14]  G. Bower The influence of graded reductions in reward and prior frustrating events upon the magnitude of the frustration effect. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[15]  Curt P. Richter,et al.  A behavioristic study of the activity of the rat , 1922 .

[16]  D. LaBerge A recruitment theory of simple behavior , 1962 .

[17]  A. Amsel,et al.  Motivational properties of frustration. I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  K. F. Muenzinger Vicarious Trial and Error at a Point of Choice: I. A General Survey of its Relation to Learning Efficiency , 1938 .

[19]  John W. Atkinson,et al.  Introduction: Motivation , 1964 .

[20]  K. Spence The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. , 1937 .

[21]  I. Maltzman The process need. , 1952, Psychological review.

[22]  R. Lachman The model in theory construction. , 1960, Psychological review.

[23]  E. Stellar,et al.  The rats rate of drinking as a function of water deprivation. , 1952, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Some Neglected Variables in Contemporary Conceptions of Decision and Performance , 1964 .