Investigating time domain EMI signals diffusion in a conducting environment for UXO detection and classification

This paper investigates diffusion behavior of electromagnetic induction (EMI) signals in multilayer structures to enhance unexploded ordnances (UXO) detection and classification in a marine environment. To date, advanced EMI systems and models have demonstrated excellent classification performance for detecting and discriminating subsurface metallic targets on land. However, the marine environment introduces complexities in both primary and secondary EMI signals. These complexities, such as salinity, air-water-sediment boundaries, etc., could negatively affect target classification performance. The main objective of this paper is to analyze time domain EMI signal diffusion and understand the factors affecting the performance of advanced EMI systems in the marine environment. We use the method of auxiliary sources and the cylindrical plane wave expansion technique to model the performance of current state of the art EMI systems for detecting and classifying underwater UXO in the frequency domain. This model accounts for the spatial (air-sea, and sea-sediment boundaries) and temporal variability of EMI fields in UW environment. Then the corresponding time domain signals are obtained using the Fourier cosine/sine transforms and Anderson filters. While others have shown the significance of environmental EMI response in marine environments, here we focus exclusively on the effect of layer boundaries in that domain. Sensitivity is shown with respect to transmitter coil sizes, sediment conductivity and magnetic permeability, and the target placement in the conducting sediment.

[1]  Walter L. Anderson,et al.  Computer program; numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders O and 1 by adaptive digital filtering , 1979 .

[2]  Michael Tuley,et al.  The UXO Classification Demonstration at the Former Camp Butner, NC , 2011 .

[3]  Kevin O'Neill,et al.  Analysis of the effect of salt water on time domain electromagnetic induction sensing of submerged metallic objects , 2019, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  Fridon Shubitidze,et al.  Investigation of broadband electromagnetic induction scattering by highly conductive, permeable, arbitrarily shaped 3-D objects , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Transient Electromagnetic Scattering of a Metallic Object Buried in Underwater Sediments , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Walter L. Anderson,et al.  Algorithm 588: Fast Hankel Transforms Using Related and Lagged Convolutions , 1982, TOMS.

[7]  Debra Knopman,et al.  Unexploded Ordnance: A Critical Review of Risk Assessment Methods , 2004 .

[8]  Keli Sun,et al.  Application of the method of auxiliary sources to the wide-band electromagnetic induction problem , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Steve Saville Underwater Advanced Time-Domain Electromagnetic System , 2017 .

[10]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  A hybrid full MAS and Combined MAS/TSA Algorithm for Electromagnetic Induction Sensing , 2004 .

[11]  Carl T. Friedrichs,et al.  Empirical investigation of the factors influencing marine applications of EMI , 2013 .