Targeting the Optimal Design in Randomized Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes and No Covariate: Theoretical Study

This article is devoted to the asymptotic study of adaptive group sequential designs in the case of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with binary treatment, binary outcome and no covariate. By adaptive design, we mean in this setting a RCT design that allows the investigator to dynamically modify its course through data-driven adjustment of the randomization probability based on data accrued so far, without negatively impacting on the statistical integrity of the trial. By adaptive group sequential design, we refer to the fact that group sequential testing methods can be equally well applied on top of adaptive designs. We obtain that, theoretically, the adaptive design converges almost surely to the targeted unknown randomization scheme. In the estimation framework, we obtain that our maximum likelihood estimator of the parameter of interest is a strongly consistent estimator, and it satisfies a central limit theorem. We can estimate its asymptotic variance, which is the same as that it would feature had we known in advance the targeted randomization scheme and independently sampled from it. Consequently, inference can be carried out as if we had resorted to independent and identically distributed (iid) sampling. In the testing framework, we obtain that the multidimensional t-statistic that we would use under iid sampling still converges to the same canonical distribution under adaptive sampling. Consequently, the same group sequential testing can be carried out as if we had resorted to iid sampling. Furthermore, a comprehensive simulation study that we undertake in a companion article validates the theory. A three-sentence take-home message is “Adaptive designs do learn the targeted optimal design and inference, and testing can be carried out under adaptive sampling as they would under the targeted optimal randomization probability iid sampling. In particular, adaptive designs achieve the same efficiency as the fixed oracle design. This is confirmed by a simulation study, at least for moderate or large sample sizes, across a large collection of targeted randomization probabilities.'”

[1]  M. J. van der Laan,et al.  Targeting the Optimal Design in Randomized Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes and No Covariate: Simulation Study , 2011 .

[2]  Ramon van Handel On the minimal penalty for Markov order estimation , 2009, ArXiv.

[3]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Efficient randomized-adaptive designs , 2009, 0908.3435.

[4]  Somesh Chattopadhyay,et al.  Statistical Monitoring of Clinical Trials: A Unified Approach , 2008 .

[5]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Optimal two-stage group-sequential designs , 2008 .

[6]  J Mark,et al.  The Construction and Analysis of Adaptive Group Sequential Designs , 2008 .

[7]  C. Assaid,et al.  The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials , 2007 .

[8]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Implementing Optimal Allocation in Sequential Binary Response Experiments , 2007 .

[9]  F. Hu,et al.  A GENERALIZED DROP-THE-LOSER URN FOR CLINICAL TRIALS WITH DELAYED RESPONSES , 2007 .

[10]  M. J. van der Laan,et al.  The International Journal of Biostatistics Targeted Maximum Likelihood Learning , 2011 .

[11]  Anastasios A Tsiatis,et al.  Adaptive two‐stage designs in phase II clinical trials , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Howard L Golub The need for more efficient trial designs. , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Scott S Emerson,et al.  Issues in the use of adaptive clinical trial designs , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Cyrus R Mehta,et al.  Adaptive, group sequential and decision theoretic approaches to sample size determination , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Michael A. Proschan,et al.  Statistical Monitoring of Clinical Trials: A Unified Approach , 2006 .

[16]  F. Hu,et al.  Asymptotic theorems of sequential estimation-adjusted urn models , 2006, math/0603329.

[17]  D. Berry Bayesian clinical trials , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  M. A. Best Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health‐Care Evaluation , 2005 .

[19]  D. Schriger Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation, D.J. Spiegelhalter, K.R. Abrams, J.P. Myles. John Wiley & Sons (2004), 406 pages, $85.00 ISBN 0-47149975-7 , 2004 .

[20]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Asymptotic normality of urn models for clinical trials with delayed response , 2004 .

[21]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation: Spiegelhalter/Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation , 2004 .

[22]  A. Tsiatis,et al.  On the inefficiency of the adaptive design for monitoring clinical trials , 2003 .

[23]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Asymptotic properties of doubly adaptive biased coin designs for multitreatment clinical trials , 2003 .

[24]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Mid‐course sample size modification in clinical trials based on the observed treatment effect , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  A play-the-winner-type urn design with reduced variability , 2003 .

[26]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  RANDOMIZED URN MODELS AND SEQUENTIAL DESIGN , 2002 .

[27]  N Stallard,et al.  Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials , 2001, Biometrics.

[28]  KyungMann Kim Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials , 2001 .

[29]  Jon A. Wellner,et al.  Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics , 1996 .

[30]  Jeffrey R. Eisele The doubly adaptive biased coin design for sequential clinical trials , 1994 .

[31]  P. Sen,et al.  Large sample methods in statistics , 1993 .

[32]  C. A. Roberts,et al.  Discussion * , 1970, Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting.

[33]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Randomized Play-the-Winner Rule in Medical Trials , 1978 .

[34]  Peter Armitage,et al.  Sequential Medical Trials , 1961, Biomedicine / [publiee pour l'A.A.I.C.I.G.].

[35]  Thomas A. Louis,et al.  Sequential treatment allocation in clinical trials , 1971 .

[36]  B. Efron Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced , 1971 .

[37]  P. Billingsley,et al.  Convergence of Probability Measures , 1970, The Mathematical Gazette.

[38]  Herman Chernoff,et al.  A Bayes Sequential Sampling Inspection Plan , 1965 .