Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Assays for the Diagnosis of Active and Relapsed Cases of Human Brucellosis.

This study aimed to compare polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with serum agglutination test (SAT) in the diagnosis of patients before and 6 months after treatment. Peripheral blood specimens from 50 patients with brucellosis (case group) and 30 subjects without brucellosis (control group) were selected and entered into the study. The diagnosis of brucellosis was established using SAT ≥ 1:160 and 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) ≥ 1:80 with clinical signs and symptoms compatible with brucellosis. For each case, both before treatment and 6 months after completion of therapy, SAT, 2-ME, and PCR were performed. Subjects in the control group were assessed by the same tests at the initial visit. In the case group, 50 patients (36 males, 14 females) with the mean age of 43.6 ± 14.5 years were evaluated. The mean age of the control group was 40.6 ± 14 years. Among the 50 patients whose nested PCR assays were initially positive, 43 (86%) were negative 6 months after completing treatment. Relapse occurred in five (10%) patients within 6 months after treatment and all were PCR positive. None of the patients in the control group was PCR positive. Results show that PCR seems to be highly sensitive and specific, and therefore is a useful method for both the initial diagnosis and detection of relapse or chronic brucellosis.

[1]  Mirnejad Reza,et al.  Comparing Rapid and Specific Detection of Brucella in Clinical Samples by PCR-ELISA and Multiplex-PCR Method , 2016 .

[2]  R. Mirnejad,et al.  Comparing Rapid and Specific Detection of Brucella in Clinical Samples by PCR-ELISA and Multiplex-PCR Method. , 2016, Iranian journal of pathology.

[3]  Su Jin Lee,et al.  Relapsed Brucellosis Presenting as Neurobrucellosis with Cerebral Vasculitis in a Patient Previously Diagnosed with Brucellar Spondylitis: A Case Report , 2015, Infection & chemotherapy.

[4]  M. Rad,et al.  Evaluation of different primers for detection of Brucella in human and animal serum samples by using PCR method. , 2015, Archives of Iranian medicine.

[5]  S. Pournaras,et al.  Administration of a Triple versus a Standard Double Antimicrobial Regimen for Human Brucellosis More Efficiently Eliminates Bacterial DNA Load , 2014, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[6]  Ying Wang,et al.  Polymerase chain reaction–based assays for the diagnosis of human brucellosis , 2014, Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials.

[7]  D. Moemen,et al.  PCR Versus Serology for Diagnosing of Brucellosis in Pregnant Women : Mansoura University Hospital Experience , 2013 .

[8]  J. Zagórski,et al.  Brucellosis in humans--etiology, diagnostics, clinical forms. , 2013, Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM.

[9]  P. Boura,et al.  Immunity to brucellosis. , 2013, Revue scientifique et technique.

[10]  L. Sprague,et al.  New developments in the diagnostic procedures for zoonotic brucellosis in humans. , 2013, Revue scientifique et technique.

[11]  T. Kumosani,et al.  Two-stage PCR assay for detection of human brucellosis in endemic areas , 2013, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[12]  A. Karimi,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Diagnosing Brucellosis , 2013 .

[13]  H. S. Hamid,et al.  Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis by Blood Culture (BACTEC) and PCR Method via Whole Blood and Serum , 2012 .

[14]  A. Asaad,et al.  Serological and molecular diagnosis of human brucellosis in Najran, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. , 2012, Journal of infection and public health.

[15]  W. Ahmed,et al.  Efficacy of Serological Tests in Comparison with PCR for Diagnosis of Brucellosis , 2012 .

[16]  S. Al Dahouk,et al.  Implications of laboratory diagnosis on brucellosis therapy , 2011, Expert review of anti-infective therapy.

[17]  D. Singh,et al.  Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay for Rapid Diagnosis and Its Role in Prevention of Human Brucellosis in Punjab, India , 2011, International journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  A. Al-Salamah,et al.  Comparison of different PCR methods for detection of Brucella spp. in human blood samples. , 2011, Polish journal of microbiology.

[19]  S. Akçalı,et al.  Evaluation of serological tests for diagnosis of brucellosis. , 2011, Japanese journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  J. Solera Update on brucellosis: therapeutic challenges. , 2010, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[21]  G. Araj Update on laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis. , 2010, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[22]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Review of detection of Brucella spp. by polymerase chain reaction. , 2010, Croatian medical journal.

[23]  K. Ravikumar,et al.  Brucellosis: Review on the Recent Trends in Pathogenicity and Laboratory Diagnosis , 2010, Journal of laboratory physicians.

[24]  Ali Bijani,et al.  Comparison of the efficacy of gentamicin for 5 days plus doxycycline for 8 weeks versus streptomycin for 2 weeks plus doxycycline for 45 days in the treatment of human brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial. , 2010, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[25]  Ali Bijani,et al.  Follow-up standard agglutination and 2-mercaptoethanol tests in 175 clinically cured cases of human brucellosis. , 2010, International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases.

[26]  Y. W.L SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS , 2010 .

[27]  Bruno Garin-Bastuji,et al.  Real-time PCR for identification of Brucella spp.: a comparative study of IS711, bcsp31 and per target genes. , 2009, Veterinary microbiology.

[28]  J. Solera,et al.  Chronic Brucellosis and Persistence of Brucella melitensis DNA , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[29]  S. Levidiotou,et al.  An eternal microbe: Brucella DNA load persists for years after clinical cure. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[30]  D. Blazes,et al.  Evaluation of brucellosis by PCR and persistence after treatment in patients returning to the hospital for follow-up. , 2007, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[31]  E. Souliou,et al.  Evaluation of Different PCR Assays for Early Detection of Acute and Relapsing Brucellosis in Humans in Comparison with Conventional Methods , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[32]  J. Solera,et al.  Use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction to monitor the evolution of Brucella melitensis DNA load during therapy and post-therapy follow-up in patients with brucellosis. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[33]  A. Khosravi,et al.  ISOLATION OF BRUCELLA MELITENSIS AND BRUCELLA ABORTUS FROM BRUCELLOSIS PATIENTS BY CONVENTIONAL CULTURE METHOD AND POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION TECHNIQUE , 2006 .

[34]  S. Wright,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of a single-tube nested PCR for the laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis in Kuwait. , 2005, Journal of medical microbiology.

[35]  J. Solera,et al.  Comparison of three different PCR methods for detection of Brucella spp in human blood samples. , 2002, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[36]  S. Wright,et al.  Single-tube, nested PCR for the diagnosis of human brucellosis in Kuwait , 2002, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[37]  A. Cloeckaert,et al.  An IS711 Element Downstream of thebp26 Gene Is a Specific Marker of Brucella spp. Isolated from Marine Mammals , 2000, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[38]  B. Drasar,et al.  Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. , 1992, The Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[39]  G. Moustardier [Treatment of brucellosis]. , 1952, Journal de medecine de Bordeaux et du Sud-Ouest.