A Conserved Docking Site in MEKs Mediates High-affinity Binding to MAP Kinases and Cooperates with a Scaffold Protein to Enhance Signal Transmission*
暂无分享,去创建一个
L. Flatauer | A. Bardwell | L. Bardwell | J. Thorner | L Bardwell | J Thorner | K. Matsukuma | A J Bardwell | L J Flatauer | K Matsukuma | Laura J. Flatauer | J. Bardwell
[1] N. Osheroff,et al. Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activates Topoisomerase IIα through a Mechanism Independent of Phosphorylation , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[2] S. Pelech,et al. Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of the human mitogen-activated protein kinase p44erk1 , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.
[3] L. Johnson,et al. The structural basis for substrate recognition and control by protein kinases 1 , 1998 .
[4] R. Sikorski,et al. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.
[5] Kun-Liang Guan,et al. Kinase Suppressor of Ras Forms a Multiprotein Signaling Complex and Modulates MEK Localization , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[6] B. Kemp,et al. Substrate and pseudosubstrate interactions with protein kinases: determinants of specificity. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[7] H. Schaeffer,et al. MP1: a MEK binding partner that enhances enzymatic activation of the MAP kinase cascade. , 1998, Science.
[8] R. Davis,et al. An osmosensing signal transduction pathway in mammalian cells. , 1994, Science.
[9] Daniel R. Caffrey,et al. The Evolution of the MAP Kinase Pathways: Coduplication of Interacting Proteins Leads to New Signaling Cascades , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[10] Brian J. Stevenson,et al. Yeast MEK-dependent signal transduction: response thresholds and parameters affecting fidelity , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.
[11] G. Sprague,,et al. Protein-protein interactions in the yeast pheromone response pathway: Ste5p interacts with all members of the MAP kinase cascade. , 1994, Genetics.
[12] J. Wilsbacher,et al. The N-terminal ERK-binding Site of MEK1 Is Required for Efficient Feedback Phosphorylation by ERK2 in Vitro and ERK Activation in Vivo * , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[13] C. Zuker,et al. Specificity in signaling pathways: assembly into multimolecular signaling complexes. , 1998, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[14] E. Goldsmith,et al. Contributions of the Mitogen-activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Backbone and Phosphorylation Loop to MEK Specificity* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[15] Jonathan A. Cooper,et al. Protein modification: Docking sites for kinases , 1999, Current Biology.
[16] L. Bardwell,et al. Differential regulation of transcription: repression by unactivated mitogen-activated protein kinase Kss1 requires the Dig1 and Dig2 proteins. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[17] J. Gibbs,et al. Pharmaceutical research in molecular oncology , 1994, Cell.
[18] W. R. Burack,et al. Signal transduction: hanging on a scaffold. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.
[19] D E Griswold,et al. Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase as a therapeutic strategy. , 2000, Immunopharmacology.
[20] Joseph D. Schrag,et al. Interaction of a G-protein β-subunit with a conserved sequence in Ste20/PAK family protein kinases , 1998, Nature.
[21] H. Lowman,et al. Bacteriophage display and discovery of peptide leads for drug development. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[22] Charis Eng,et al. Catalytic specificity of protein-tyrosine kinases is critical for selective signalling , 1995, Nature.
[23] L. Hartwell. Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae unresponsive to cell division control by polypeptide mating hormone , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.
[24] J. Thorner,et al. Mutational analysis suggests that activation of the yeast pheromone response mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway involves conformational changes in the Ste5 scaffold protein. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.
[25] B. Errede,et al. Constitutive mutants of the protein kinase STE11 activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein. , 1992, Genes & development.
[26] Marc W. Kirschner,et al. How Proteolysis Drives the Cell Cycle , 1996, Science.
[27] J. Thorner,et al. Ste5 RING-H2 domain: role in Ste4-promoted oligomerization for yeast pheromone signaling. , 1997, Science.
[28] L. Bardwell,et al. A conserved motif at the amino termini of MEKs might mediate high-affinity interaction with the cognate MAPKs. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[29] Jehoshua Bruck,et al. Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[30] M. Cobb,et al. Scaffolding and protein interactions in MAP kinase modules. , 1999, Cell calcium.
[31] C. Tournier,et al. The MKK7 Gene Encodes a Group of c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Kinases , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[32] K. Guan,et al. Properties of MEKs, the kinases that phosphorylate and activate the extracellular signal-regulated kinases. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[33] L. Bardwell,et al. Signal propagation and regulation in the mating pheromone response pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Developmental biology.
[34] I. Tsigelny,et al. JNK2 contains a specificity-determining region responsible for efficient c-Jun binding and phosphorylation. , 1994, Genes & development.
[35] R. Landgraf,et al. Human ERK1 Induces Filamentous Growth and Cell Wall Remodeling Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae * , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[36] Masahiko Hibi,et al. c-Jun Can Recruit JNK to Phosphorylate Dimerization Partners via Specific Docking Interactions , 1996, Cell.
[37] J. Thorner,et al. Mutational analysis of STE5 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: application of a differential interaction trap assay for examining protein-protein interactions. , 1997, Genetics.
[38] L. Bardwell,et al. Two novel targets of the MAP kinase Kss1 are negative regulators of invasive growth in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Genes & development.
[39] J. Thorner,et al. Mutational activation of the STE5 gene product bypasses the requirement for G protein beta and gamma subunits in the yeast pheromone response pathway , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.
[40] H. Rubinfeld,et al. Identification of a Cytoplasmic-Retention Sequence in ERK2* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[41] Gaochao Zhou,et al. Components of a New Human Protein Kinase Signal Transduction Pathway (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[42] A. Brunet,et al. Identification of MAP Kinase Domains by Redirecting Stress Signals into Growth Factor Responses , 1996, Science.
[43] K. Guan,et al. Cloning and characterization of two distinct human extracellular signal-regulated kinase activator kinases, MEK1 and MEK2. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[44] N. Ahn,et al. Catalytic reaction pathway for the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK2. , 2000, Biochemistry.
[45] M. Peter,et al. Phosphorylation of the MEKK Ste11p by the PAK-like kinase Ste20p is required for MAP kinase signaling in vivo , 2000, Current Biology.
[46] G. Rubin,et al. KSR modulates signal propagation within the MAPK cascade. , 1996, Genes & development.
[47] Jonathan A. Cooper,et al. Purification and characterization of mitogen-activated protein kinase activator(s) from epidermal growth factor-stimulated A431 cells. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[48] L. Bardwell,et al. Inhibitory and activating functions for MAPK Kss1 in the S. cerevisiae filamentous- growth signalling pathway , 1997, Nature.
[49] L. Bardwell,et al. Repression of yeast Ste12 transcription factor by direct binding of unphosphorylated Kss1 MAPK and its regulation by the Ste7 MEK. , 1998, Genes & development.
[50] H. Schaeffer,et al. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases: Specific Messages from Ubiquitous Messengers , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[51] R. Davis,et al. Structural organization of MAP-kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in yeast and mammals. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[52] E. Nishida,et al. A conserved docking motif in MAP kinases common to substrates, activators and regulators , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.
[53] E. Goldsmith,et al. Phosphorylation of MAP Kinases by MAP/ERK Involves Multiple Regions of MAP Kinases* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[54] B. Cairns,et al. Signaling in the yeast pheromone response pathway: specific and high-affinity interaction of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases Kss1 and Fus3 with the upstream MAP kinase kinase Ste7 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.
[55] K Kornfeld,et al. Multiple docking sites on substrate proteins form a modular system that mediates recognition by ERK MAP kinase. , 1999, Genes & development.
[56] J. Yasuda,et al. A mammalian scaffold complex that selectively mediates MAP kinase activation. , 1998, Science.
[57] B. Schulman,et al. Substrate recruitment to cyclin-dependent kinase 2 by a multipurpose docking site on cyclin A. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[58] A. Sharrocks,et al. Differential targeting of MAP kinases to the ETS‐domain transcription factor Elk‐1 , 1998, The EMBO journal.
[59] K. Clark,et al. Association of the yeast pheromone response G protein beta gamma subunits with the MAP kinase scaffold Ste5p. , 1995, Science.
[60] T. Egelhoff,et al. Dictyostelium Myosin Heavy Chain Kinase A Subdomains , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[61] T. Creighton. Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties , 1986 .
[62] R. Pearson,et al. Protein kinase phosphorylation site sequences and consensus specificity motifs: tabulations. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.
[63] J. Ferrell. Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[64] E. Nishida,et al. Nuclear Export of Map Kinase (ERK) Involves a Map Kinase Kinase (Mek-Dependent) Active Transport Mechanism , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.
[65] Bruce J Mayer,et al. Concentration-dependent positive and negative regulation of a MAP kinase by a MAP kinase kinase , 1999, Oncogene.
[66] F. Posas,et al. Osmotic activation of the HOG MAPK pathway via Ste11p MAPKKK: scaffold role of Pbs2p MAPKK. , 1997, Science.
[67] E. Nishida,et al. Interaction of MAP kinase with MAP kinase kinase: its possible role in the control of nucleocytoplasmic transport of MAP kinase , 1997, The EMBO journal.
[68] M. Mock,et al. Anthrax lethal factor cleaves the N‐terminus of MAPKKS and induces tyrosine/threonine phosphorylation of MAPKS in cultured macrophages , 1999, Journal of applied microbiology.
[69] N. Ahn,et al. Signal transduction through MAP kinase cascades. , 1998, Advances in cancer research.
[70] K D Paull,et al. Proteolytic inactivation of MAP-kinase-kinase by anthrax lethal factor. , 1998, Science.
[71] E. Elion. Routing MAP Kinase Cascades , 1998, Science.
[72] E. Krebs,et al. Protein phosphorylation and signal transduction. , 1999, Pharmacology & therapeutics.
[73] T. Soderling,et al. A structural basis for substrate specificities of protein Ser/Thr kinases: primary sequence preference of casein kinases I and II, NIMA, phosphorylase kinase, calmodulin-dependent kinase II, CDK5, and Erk1 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.
[74] M. Gustin,et al. MAP Kinase Pathways in the YeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.
[75] M Dickens,et al. Interaction of a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Module with the Neuronal Protein JIP3 , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[76] E. Elion,et al. Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae , 1994, Cell.
[77] T. Hunter,et al. Signaling—2000 and Beyond , 2000, Cell.
[78] H. Enslen,et al. Molecular determinants that mediate selective activation of p38 MAP kinase isoforms , 2000, The EMBO journal.
[79] E. Elion,et al. Functional binding between Gβ and the LIM domain of Ste5 is required to activate the MEKK Ste11 , 1998, Current Biology.
[80] N. Ahn,et al. Interdependent domains controlling the enzymatic activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1. , 1996, Biochemistry.
[81] G L Johnson,et al. Organization and regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.
[82] T. Pawson,et al. Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. , 1997, Science.
[83] J. Woodgett,et al. Mammalian Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathways Are Regulated through Formation of Specific Kinase-Activator Complexes* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[84] Charles S. Zuker,et al. Assembly of the Drosophila phototransduction cascade into a signalling complex shapes elementary responses , 1998, Nature.
[85] Jiahuai Han,et al. Structure-Function Studies of p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[86] M. Karin,et al. JNKK1 organizes a MAP kinase module through specific and sequential interactions with upstream and downstream components mediated by its amino-terminal extension. , 1998, Genes & development.
[87] R. Pulido,et al. Interaction of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases with the Kinase Interaction Motif of the Tyrosine Phosphatase PTP-SL Provides Substrate Specificity and Retains ERK2 in the Cytoplasm* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[88] P. Pryciak,et al. Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gbetagamma complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. , 1998, Genes & development.