Identifying and Removing a Calculus Prerequisite as a Bottleneck in Clemson's General Engineering Curriculum

A review of prerequisites often reveals that reasons for requiring a prerequisite may no longer prevail due to curriculum or course changes. Based on a study of a curriculum bottleneck unrelated to required mastery, the prerequisite structure in Clemson University's General Engineering curriculum (the common first-year curriculum for all engineering students) was changed so that Calculus I could be taken in the second semester. Student record analysis shows both the magnitude of the bottleneck prior to the policy change and the effect on student enrollment practices after the policy change. Longitudinal studies show a statistically significant improvement in retention in engineering adding to the body of evidence that indicates that it is important to retention that students start college mathematics at a level for which they are prepared.

[1]  Incorporating mathematics in a freshman engineering course , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[2]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity , 1991 .

[4]  David Cordes,et al.  An integrated first-year curriculum for computer science and computer engineering , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.

[5]  G. Bjedov,et al.  Assessment of the impact of the freshman engineering courses , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.