Towardsin silicodesignof epitope-basedvaccines
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Christina Kuttler. An Algorithm for the Prediction of Proteasomal Cleavages , 2000, German Conference on Bioinformatics.
[2] Yoram Louzoun,et al. Precise score for the prediction of peptides cleaved by the proteasome , 2008, Bioinform..
[3] Shinn-Ying Ho,et al. POPI: predicting immunogenicity of MHC class I binding peptides by mining informative physicochemical properties , 2007, Bioinform..
[4] S. H. van der Burg,et al. Phase I Immunotherapeutic Trial with Long Peptides Spanning the E6 and E7 Sequences of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus 16 in End-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Shows Low Toxicity and Robust Immunogenicity , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.
[5] Ellis L. Reinherz,et al. Enhancement to the RANKPEP resource for the prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules using profiles , 2004, Immunogenetics.
[6] Pingping Guan,et al. EpiJen: a server for multistep T cell epitope prediction , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[7] Morten Nielsen,et al. Large-scale validation of methods for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope prediction , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.
[8] Maria V. Tejada-Simon,et al. Naturally Processed HLA Class II Peptides Reveal Highly Conserved Immunogenic Flanking Region Sequence Preferences That Reflect Antigen Processing Rather Than Peptide-MHC Interactions1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.
[9] Vladimir Brusic,et al. Evaluation of MHC-II peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.
[10] Søren Buus,et al. Peptide binding specificity of major histocompatibility complex class I resolved into an array of apparently independent subspecificities: quantitation by peptide libraries and improved prediction of binding , 1996, European journal of immunology.
[11] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. Pcleavage: an SVM based method for prediction of constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome cleavage sites in antigenic sequences , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[12] David Heckerman,et al. Leveraging Information Across HLA Alleles/Supertypes Improves Epitope Prediction , 2007, J. Comput. Biol..
[13] Peter Walden,et al. Exact prediction of a natural T cell epitope , 1991, European journal of immunology.
[14] Manoj Bhasin,et al. Analysis and prediction of affinity of TAP binding peptides using cascade SVM , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[15] Oliver Kohlbacher,et al. OptiTope—a web server for the selection of an optimal set of peptides for epitope-based vaccines , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..
[16] K. Parker,et al. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. , 1994, Journal of immunology.
[17] Tomer Hertz,et al. PepDist: A New Framework for Protein-Peptide Binding Prediction based on Learning Peptide Distance Functions , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[18] H. Rammensee,et al. SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs , 1999, Immunogenetics.
[19] M F del Guercio,et al. Several common HLA-DR types share largely overlapping peptide binding repertoires. , 1998, Journal of immunology.
[20] Marie-Paule Lefranc,et al. IMGT/3Dstructure-DB and IMGT/StructuralQuery, a database and a tool for immunoglobulin, T cell receptor and MHC structural data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[21] Vladimir Brusic,et al. Prediction of MHC class II-binding peptides using an evolutionary algorithm and artificial neural network , 1998, Bioinform..
[22] O. Lund,et al. Definition of supertypes for HLA molecules using clustering of specificity matrices , 2004, Immunogenetics.
[23] O. Lund,et al. novel sequence representations Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with , 2003 .
[24] O. Lund,et al. An integrative approach to CTL epitope prediction: A combined algorithm integrating MHC class I binding, TAP transport efficiency, and proteasomal cleavage predictions , 2005, European journal of immunology.
[25] Arne Elofsson,et al. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC , 2002, BMC Bioinformatics.
[26] G. Jung,et al. From combinatorial libraries to MHC ligand motifs, T-cell superagonists and antagonists. , 2001, Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization.
[27] John Sidney,et al. Improving MHC binding peptide prediction by incorporating binding data of auxiliary MHC molecules , 2006, Bioinform..
[28] Cécile Gouttefangeas,et al. Identification of tumor‐associated MHC class I ligands by a novel T cell‐independent approach , 2000, European journal of immunology.
[29] Ji Wan,et al. SVRMHC prediction server for MHC-binding peptides , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[30] D. Zaller,et al. Prediction of peptide affinity to HLA DRB1*0401. , 1994, International archives of allergy and immunology.
[31] Channa K. Hattotuwagama,et al. MHCPred 2.0 , 2006 .
[32] P. Opolon,et al. High vaccination efficiency of low-affinity epitopes in antitumor immunotherapy. , 2004, The Journal of clinical investigation.
[33] Gunnar Rätsch,et al. Support Vector Machines and Kernels for Computational Biology , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[34] Irini A. Doytchinova,et al. Towards the in silico identification of class II restricted T-cell epitopes: a partial least squares iterative self-consistent algorithm for affinity prediction , 2003, Bioinform..
[35] O. Lund,et al. The role of the proteasome in generating cytotoxic T-cell epitopes: insights obtained from improved predictions of proteasomal cleavage , 2005, Immunogenetics.
[36] Naoki Abe,et al. Empirical Evaluation of a Dynamic Experiment Design Method for Prediction of MHC Class I-Binding Peptides1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.
[37] Claude Beazley,et al. A Novel Predictive Technique for the MHC Class II Peptide-Binding Interaction , 2003, Molecular medicine.
[38] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. ProPred1: Prediction of Promiscuous MHC Class-I Binding Sites , 2003, Bioinform..
[39] Bjoern Peters,et al. Identifying MHC Class I Epitopes by Predicting the TAP Transport Efficiency of Epitope Precursors , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.
[40] Oliver Kohlbacher,et al. EpiToolKit—a web server for computational immunomics , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..
[41] Z. Nagy,et al. Precise prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II-peptide interaction based on peptide side chain scanning , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[42] J. Sidney,et al. Improved Immunogenicity of an Immunodominant Epitope of the Her-2/neu Protooncogene by Alterations of MHC Contact Residues1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.
[43] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. ProPred: prediction of HLA-DR binding sites , 2001, Bioinform..
[44] Tomer Hertz,et al. Predicting Protein-Peptide Binding Affinity by Learning Peptide-Peptide Distance Functions , 2005, RECOMB.
[45] R. Orlando,et al. A new liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric approach for the identification of class I major histocompatibility complex associated peptides that eliminates the need for bioassays. , 1999, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.
[46] Y. Z. Chen,et al. Prediction of MHC-binding peptides of flexible lengths from sequence-derived structural and physicochemical properties. , 2007, Molecular immunology.
[47] P. Dönnes,et al. Integrated modeling of the major events in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[48] Pierre Baldi,et al. Bioinformatics - the machine learning approach (2. ed.) , 2000 .
[49] Oliver Kohlbacher,et al. SNEP: SNP-derived Epitope Prediction program for minor H antigens , 2005, Immunogenetics.
[50] A Sette,et al. The peptide-binding motif for the human transporter associated with antigen processing , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[51] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. SVM based method for predicting HLA-DRB1*0401 binding peptides in an antigen sequence , 2004, Bioinform..
[52] Yao-Tseng Chen,et al. CD8+ T cell responses against a dominant cryptic HLA-A2 epitope after NY-ESO-1 peptide immunization of cancer patients , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[53] P. Kloetzel,et al. Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage,TAP transport and MHC class I binding , 2005, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.
[54] H Mamitsuka,et al. Predicting peptides that bind to MHC molecules using supervised learning of hidden markov models , 1998, Proteins.
[55] Hans-Georg Rammensee,et al. The Tübingen approach: identification, selection, and validation of tumor-associated HLA peptides for cancer therapy , 2004, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.
[56] Jonathan J. Lewis,et al. Heteroclitic Immunization Induces Tumor Immunity , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[57] P. Kloetzel,et al. MAPPP: MHC class I antigenic peptide processing prediction. , 2003, Applied bioinformatics.
[58] V. Brusic,et al. Evaluation of MHC class I peptide binding prediction servers: Applications for vaccine research , 2008, BMC Immunology.
[59] A. Vitiello,et al. The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. , 1994, Journal of immunology.
[60] P. Kloetzel,et al. The cleavage preference of the proteasome governs the yield of antigenic peptides , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[61] O. Lund,et al. The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource: From Vision to Blueprint , 2005, PLoS biology.
[62] V Brusic,et al. Relationship between peptide selectivities of human transporters associated with antigen processing and HLA class I molecules. , 1998, Journal of immunology.
[63] J. Wolchok,et al. Immunological validation of the EpitOptimizer program for streamlined design of heteroclitic epitopes. , 2007, Vaccine.
[64] Vladimir Brusic,et al. Prediction of promiscuous peptides that bind HLA class I molecules , 2002, Immunology and cell biology.
[65] David Heckerman,et al. Coping with Viral Diversity in HIV Vaccine Design , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[66] J. Sidney,et al. Nine major HLA class I supertypes account for the vast preponderance of HLA-A and -B polymorphism , 1999, Immunogenetics.
[67] D. Flower,et al. Additive method for the prediction of protein-peptide binding affinity. Application to the MHC class I molecule HLA-A*0201. , 2002, Journal of proteome research.
[68] M. V. Regenmortel,et al. Mapping Epitope Structure and Activity: From One-Dimensional Prediction to Four-Dimensional Description of Antigenic Specificity , 1996 .
[69] Channa K. Hattotuwagama,et al. AntiJen: a quantitative immunology database integrating functional, thermodynamic, kinetic, biophysical, and cellular data , 2005, Immunome research.
[70] D. DeLuca,et al. A modular concept of HLA for comprehensive peptide binding prediction , 2006, Immunogenetics.
[71] N. Senzer,et al. Phase I Trial of sequential administration of recombinant DNA and adenovirus expressing L523S protein in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.
[72] Chee Keong Kwoh,et al. PREDTAP: a system for prediction of peptide binding to the human transporter associated with antigen processing , 2006, Immunome research.
[73] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[74] T. Hanai,et al. Hidden Markov model-based prediction of antigenic peptides that interact with MHC class II molecules. , 2002, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.
[75] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. MHCBN: a comprehensive database of MHC binding and non-binding peptides , 2003, Bioinform..
[76] Pingping Guan,et al. MHCPred: a server for quantitative prediction of peptide-MHC binding , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[77] John Sidney,et al. Structural Features of Peptide Analogs of Human Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen Class I Epitopes That Are More Potent and Immunogenic than Wild-Type Peptide , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[78] Morten Nielsen,et al. Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations , 2007, Bioinform..
[79] Ferry Ossendorp,et al. Efficient Identification of Novel Hla-A*0201–Presented Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Epitopes in the Widely Expressed Tumor Antigen Prame by Proteasome-Mediated Digestion Analysis , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[80] Yang Dai,et al. Prediction of MHC class II binding peptides based on an iterative learning model , 2005, Immunome research.
[81] Bjoern Peters,et al. Automated generation and evaluation of specific MHC binding predictive tools: ARB matrix applications , 2005, Immunogenetics.
[82] Guido Ferrari,et al. Durable HIV-1 antibody and T-cell responses elicited by an adjuvanted multi-protein recombinant vaccine in uninfected human volunteers. , 2007, Vaccine.
[83] D. Rognan,et al. Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[84] Ora Schueler-Furman,et al. Learning MHC I - peptide binding , 2006, ISMB.
[85] Anne S De Groot,et al. HIV vaccine development by computer assisted design: the GAIA vaccine. , 2005, Vaccine.
[86] J A Koziol,et al. Prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules. , 1995, Journal of immunological methods.
[87] O. Schueler‐Furman,et al. Structure‐based prediction of binding peptides to MHC class I molecules: Application to a broad range of MHC alleles , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[88] C. Slingluff,et al. Immunologic and Clinical Outcomes of a Randomized Phase II Trial of Two Multipeptide Vaccines for Melanoma in the Adjuvant Setting , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.
[89] Jean-Philippe Vert,et al. Efficient peptide-MHC-I binding prediction for alleles with few known binders , 2008, Bioinform..
[90] John Sidney,et al. A Systematic Assessment of MHC Class II Peptide Binding Predictions and Evaluation of a Consensus Approach , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[91] Gajendra P.S. Raghava,et al. Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques. , 2004, Vaccine.
[92] John Sidney,et al. Examining the independent binding assumption for binding of peptide epitopes to MHC-I molecules , 2003, Bioinform..
[93] B. Korber,et al. Expanded Breadth of the T-Cell Response to Mosaic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope DNA Vaccination , 2008, Journal of Virology.
[94] S. Brunak,et al. Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks. , 2002, Protein engineering.
[95] C. Slingluff,et al. A Multipeptide Vaccine is Safe and Elicits T-cell Responses in Participants With Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer , 2008, Journal of immunotherapy.
[96] Gajendra P.S. Raghava,et al. A hybrid approach for predicting promiscuous MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.
[97] P. Kloetzel,et al. A kinetic model of vertebrate 20S proteasome accounting for the generation of major proteolytic fragments from oligomeric peptide substrates. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[98] N. Marchand-Geneste,et al. Synthetic anticancer vaccine candidates: rational design of antigenic peptide mimetics that activate tumor-specific T-cells. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[99] A. D. De Groot,et al. Prediction of well-conserved HIV-1 ligands using a matrix-based algorithm, EpiMatrix. , 1998, Vaccine.
[100] Vladimir Brusic,et al. A neural network model approach to the study of human TAP transporter , 1998, Silico Biol..
[101] Morten Nielsen,et al. Pan-specific MHC class I predictors: a benchmark of HLA class I pan-specific prediction methods , 2009, Bioinform..
[102] Nebojsa Jojic,et al. Shift-Invariant Adaptive Double Threading: Learning MHC II - Peptide Binding , 2007, RECOMB.
[103] P. Kloetzel,et al. A theoretical approach towards the identification of cleavage-determining amino acid motifs of the 20 S proteasome. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[104] Anthony Kusalik,et al. Strength in numbers: achieving greater accuracy in MHC-I binding prediction by combining the results from multiple prediction tools , 2007, Immunome research.
[105] Ryuji Kato,et al. Hidden Markov model-based approach as the first screening of binding peptides that interact with MHC class II molecules , 2003 .
[106] Avner Schlessinger,et al. Towards a consensus on datasets and evaluation metrics for developing B‐cell epitope prediction tools , 2007, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[107] Morten Nielsen,et al. The PickPocket method for predicting binding specificities for receptors based on receptor pocket similarities: application to MHC-peptide binding , 2009, Bioinform..
[108] R. R. Mallios,et al. Predicting class II MHC/peptide multi-level binding with an iterative stepwise discriminant analysis meta-algorithm , 2001, Bioinform..
[109] U. Şahin,et al. Generation of tissue-specific and promiscuous HLA ligand databases using DNA microarrays and virtual HLA class II matrices , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.
[110] Darren R Flower,et al. Coupling In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Peptide-MHC Binding: A Bioinformatic Approach Enabling Prediction of Superbinding Peptides and Anchorless Epitopes , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.
[111] Oliver Kohlbacher,et al. A Mathematical Framework for the Selection of an Optimal Set of Peptides for Epitope-Based Vaccines , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[112] Z. Cao,et al. MHC-BPS: MHC-binder prediction server for identifying peptides of flexible lengths from sequence-derived physicochemical properties , 2006, Immunogenetics.
[113] J. Berzofsky,et al. Two novel T cell epitope prediction algorithms based on MHC-binding motifs; comparison of predicted and published epitopes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV protein sequences. , 1995, Vaccine.
[114] A. Sette,et al. Epitope-based vaccines: an update on epitope identification, vaccine design and delivery. , 2003, Current opinion in immunology.
[115] Manoj Bhasin,et al. Prediction of promiscuous and high-affinity mutated MHC binders. , 2003, Hybridoma and hybridomics.
[116] James McCluskey,et al. More than one reason to rethink the use of peptides in vaccine design , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[117] James Robinson,et al. IPD—the Immuno Polymorphism Database , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[118] Morten Nielsen,et al. A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[119] E. Reinherz,et al. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides using profile motifs. , 2002, Human immunology.
[120] Richard Simon,et al. Genomewide Conserved Epitope Profiles of HIV-1 Predicted by Biophysical Properties of MHC Binding Peptides , 2004, J. Comput. Biol..
[121] Christian Bréchot,et al. Immunogenicity of a hepatitis B DNA vaccine administered to chronic HBV carriers. , 2006, Vaccine.
[122] James Theiler,et al. Polyvalent vaccines for optimal coverage of potential T-cell epitopes in global HIV-1 variants , 2007, Nature Medicine.
[123] Søren Brunak,et al. Improved prediction of MHC class I and class II epitopes using a novel Gibbs sampling approach , 2004, Bioinform..
[124] Yoram Louzoun,et al. Virus-epitope vaccine design: informatic matching the HLA-I polymorphism to the virus genome. , 2007, Molecular immunology.
[125] Morten Nielsen,et al. Quantitative Predictions of Peptide Binding to Any HLA-DR Molecule of Known Sequence: NetMHCIIpan , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[126] O. Lund,et al. NetMHCpan, a Method for Quantitative Predictions of Peptide Binding to Any HLA-A and -B Locus Protein of Known Sequence , 2007, PloS one.
[127] Hermann-Georg Holzhütter,et al. Modeling the in vitro 20S proteasome activity: the effect of PA28-alphabeta and of the sequence and length of polypeptides on the degradation kinetics. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.
[128] O. Lund,et al. NetMHCpan, a method for MHC class I binding prediction beyond humans , 2008, Immunogenetics.
[129] Trevor Hastie,et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .
[130] S Brunak,et al. Sensitive quantitative predictions of peptide-MHC binding by a 'Query by Committee' artificial neural network approach. , 2003, Tissue antigens.
[131] S. Holmes,et al. Diversity and Recognition Efficiency of T Cell Responses to Cancer , 2004, PLoS medicine.
[132] H. Rammensee,et al. Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules , 1991, Nature.