Growth as a Mirror of the Condition of Society: Secular Trends and Class Distinctions

A study of the history of growth (Tanner 1981) shows that there have been three principal reasons or impulses for undertaking growth studies. First, the pure impulse of curiosity. the desire to discover the way in which a child grows, t o formulate a law describing human growth, enshrined in an ideal Human Growth Curve. Second, the more socially-oriented impulse, the impulse above all of the men and women who would reform and improve society; growth of children. as I shall show you, is a wonderfully good gauge of living conditions and the relative prosperity of different groups in a population. And third, there is the clinical impluse, the desire to monitor the growth not of populations of children but of a particular child, to ensure that it develops in the best possible way. The very first longitudinal study of growth was made out of pure curiosity. It was at the time of what we call the French Enlightenment, a period in the second half of the 18th century when education, and particularly education in science, swept away centuries-old superstitions and prejudices, and rational

[1]  J. Tanner,et al.  Clinical longitudinal standards for height and height velocity for North American children. , 1985, The Journal of pediatrics.

[2]  K. Liestøl,et al.  Height, weight and menarcheal age of Oslo schoolchildren during the last 60 years. , 1980, Annals of human biology.

[3]  W. Billewicz,et al.  Menarche in Newcastle upon Tyne girls. , 1981, Annals of human biology.

[4]  J M Tanner,et al.  Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. I. , 1966, Archives of disease in childhood.

[5]  S. Chinn,et al.  The secular trend in the height of primary school children in England and Scotland from 1972-1980. , 1984, Annals of human biology.

[6]  J M Tanner,et al.  Increase in length of leg relative to trunk in Japanese children and adults from 1957 to 1977: comparison with British and with Japanese Americans. , 1982, Annals of human biology.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Social factors and height of primary schoolchildren in England and Scotland. , 1978, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[8]  J M Tanner,et al.  Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. II. , 1966, Archives of disease in childhood.

[9]  J. Tanner Use and Abuse of Growth Standards , 1986 .

[10]  M. Baines,et al.  A new family of mathematical models describing the human growth curve. , 1978, Annals of human biology.

[11]  J. H. D. Haas,et al.  Groeidiagrammen van 1-25 jarigen in Nederland , 1960 .