The Timing of Physiologic Closure of the Metopic Suture: A Review of 159 Patients Using Reconstructed 3D CT Scans of the Craniofacial Region

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the normal physiologic timing of the closure of the metopic suture in non-craniosynostotic patients. MethodsThis clinical study involved a consecutive series of infants and young children who underwent 3D CT-scan evaluation for deformational plagiocephaly or suspected traumatic head injury. All patients with evidence of craniosynostosis were excluded from the study. Every infant and child referred to our Craniofacial Team for deformational plagiocephaly between 1997 and 2000 (n = 84) received a baseline pre-treatment 3D CT-scan of the head. Our study also included a series of selected pediatric trauma patients (1 to 24 months of age) between 1997 and 2000 (n = 75) who received CT-scan to rule out head injury. The CT scan results were reviewed for closure of metopic suture by a single observer. ResultsThe earliest evidence of metopic suture closure was at 3 months, the age at which 33% of patients (4/12) were closed. At 5 months of age, 59% (13/22) of sutures were closed. At 7 months of age, 65% (15/23) were closed. At 9 months of age, 100% (10/10) were closed. All patients greater than 9 months of age within the study had complete metopic suture closure. ConclusionOur findings suggest that normal or physiologic closure of the metopic suture occurs much earlier than what has been previously described. This study establishes that metopic fusion may normally occur as early as 3 months of age, and that complete fusion occurred by 9 months of age in all patients in our series. Therefore, 3-D CT scans showing complete closure of the metopic suture at an early age (3 to 9 months) cannot be considered as evidence of metopic synostosis, and thus, should not be the decisive factor for early surgical intervention.

[1]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Studies in Cranial Suture Biology: Regional Dura Mater Determines Overlying Suture Biology , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Studies in Cranial Suture Biology: Up‐Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor‐&bgr;1 and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor mRNA Correlates with Posterior Frontal Cranial Suture Fusion in the Rat , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  F W Zonneveld,et al.  The role of bone centers in the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis: an embryologic approach using CT measurements in isolated craniosynostosis and Apert and Crouzon syndromes. , 1996, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  I. Munro,et al.  Trigonocephaly‐Associated Hypotelorism: Is Treatment Necessary? , 1996, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  J. Marsh,et al.  Long‐Term Studies of Metopic Synostosis: Frequency of Cognitive Impairment and Behavioral Disturbances , 1996, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  M. Cohen,et al.  Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis. , 1993, American journal of medical genetics.

[7]  B. Jones,et al.  Indirect intracranial volume measurement using CT scan. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  D. Rénier,et al.  Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  D. Rénier,et al.  Intracranial Volume in Children With Craniosynostosis , 1990, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[10]  A Dhem,et al.  Metopic sutural closure in the human skull. , 1988, Journal of anatomy.

[11]  R. Albin,et al.  Trigonocephaly: Refinements in Reconstruction. Experience with 33 Patients , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  K. Kapp-Simon,et al.  Mental development and learning disorders in children with single suture craniosynostosis. , 1998, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[13]  D. Thompson,et al.  Intracranial pressure in single-suture craniosynostosis. , 1995, Pediatric neurosurgery.